censorship

[cadaverdog]

Yesterday I attempted to start a new thread on the subject of the supposed illegal war.
This morning when I attempted to reply I was somehow locked out.
My political views might not be popular but I feel I have the right to express them.
I have seen others here spread hatred and racial slurs but they are not censored .
Maybe I am mistaken and there is some other reason I cannot reply.

[LoungeMachine]

LMMFAO

Get a grip and/or a clue, will ya?

The answers you seek were right within that incredibly insightful thread you started.

But let me explain it again for you, s.l.o.w.l.y.

There was already a thread dealing with your rhetorical question, that you seem so panty-twisted because no one will give you the answer you so crave.

Your "thread" was nothing more than another attempt to get a point across which has been beaten to death. You would know this if you ever bothered to use the search function, or look past the first page of the thousands of threads in the Front Line Forum.

The reason we have MODS, is to keep the rendudant threads to a minimum, weed out spam and trolls, and to generally piss off the ignorant yokels such as yourself that just can't seem to figure things out on their own.

THIS thread title is a perfect example

NO ONE AT ANY TIME "CENSORED" YOUR VIEWS, MENSA.

So now you want to throw a pity party for yourself because you find crickets chirping around your rhetorical bullshit.

You bring your A-Game to The Front Line, or you get flattened.

Sac up, bring something other than your same whiney crap, and you'll see what I mean.

There's no crying in baseball, bitch.

And there's no quarter given in the DLR Front Line to whiners.

That is All.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by cadaverdog
Maybe I am mistaken and there is some other reason I cannot reply.

Inbreeding, perhaps?

[Nickdfresh]

Yeah, it was a shit thread...

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Yeah, it was a shit thread...

Yet one was followed up by DC that was full of facts, links to evidence, and a grasp of what actually happened.

But popeye can't see the difference, soo he cries censorship.

Fuckin Lazy Ass thread attempt at best.

I could have left it open, only to let it die it's own quick death, but that would have just caused him to start 2 more.

I hope this lesson won't be lost on the cadaver.

Never a more apropos name if there ever was one....

[Nickdfresh]

I recall the thread being more of a post response to another thread, which is just unintelligible bandwidth wasting shit...

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
I recall the thread being more of a post response to another thread, which is just unintelligible bandwidth wasting shit...

Exactly.

Popeye is hung up in his contention that BushCO was right to invade, overthrow, and occupy a sovereign nation that was no threat to us, in the name of 9/11

Spending Billiuons, killing THOUSANDS of US Soldiers and Marines, tens of thousands of children, all in the search of WMD that Hans Blix, and even Chimpy's own Intel community said didn't exist.

Ahmed Chalabi pulled one of the all-time greatest cons, and as long as there are the Bush-led Cadaverdogs pulling voting levers, we're fucked as a country.

[LoungeMachine]

Tell you what cadaverdude....

I'll reopen your incredible thread.

Let's see you bring your A-game.

Show us all how wrong I was.

[LoungeMachine]

There you go, Jethro.

I even stickied it for you so you can find it easily.

The floor is your's..........



Knock us out with your thread....

[Dan]

Welcome To The Army.

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
LMMFAO

Get a grip and/or a clue, will ya?

The answers you seek were right within that incredibly insightful thread you started.

But let me explain it again for you, s.l.o.w.l.y.

There was already a thread dealing with your rhetorical question, that you seem so panty-twisted because no one will give you the answer you so crave.

Your "thread" was nothing more than another attempt to get a point across which has been beaten to death. You would know this if you ever bothered to use the search function, or look past the first page of the thousands of threads in the Front Line Forum.

The reason we have MODS, is to keep the rendudant threads to a minimum, weed out spam and trolls, and to generally piss off the ignorant yokels such as yourself that just can't seem to figure things out on their own.

THIS thread title is a perfect example

NO ONE AT ANY TIME "CENSORED" YOUR VIEWS, MENSA.

So now you want to throw a pity party for yourself because you find crickets chirping around your rhetorical bullshit.

You bring your A-Game to The Front Line, or you get flattened.

Sac up, bring something other than your same whiney crap, and you'll see what I mean.

There's no crying in baseball, bitch.

And there's no quarter given in the DLR Front Line to whiners.

That is All.

You sure have alot of excuses now.
When you closed it your justifation was you were asked that question already.
Sack up hipocrite.
You didn't like the question because it doesn't fit in with your political ideology.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by cadaverdog
You sure have alot of excuses now.
When you closed it your justifation was you were asked that question already.
Sack up hipocrite.
You didn't like the question because it doesn't fit in with your political ideology.

What a load of bullshit.

First, you need to borrow a neighbor's dictionary [it might be proppin' up one end of the still]
You're having issues with words like censorship and hipocrite [sic] Hint: you'll find it in that big black book as hypocrite

Your shit thread was closed, then I reopened it, and you still couldn't add anything of value yourself. If DC and I hadn't bothered to do your research for you it would still be filled with crickets chirping.

NEXT time you start shit like that in The Front Line, I won't be so helpful.

moron.

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Exactly.

Popeye is hung up in his contention that BushCO was right to invade, overthrow, and occupy a sovereign nation that was no threat to us, in the name of 9/11

Spending Billiuons, killing THOUSANDS of US Soldiers and Marines, tens of thousands of children, all in the search of WMD that Hans Blix, and even Chimpy's own Intel community said didn't exist.

Ahmed Chalabi pulled one of the all-time greatest cons, and as long as there are the Bush-led Cadaverdogs pulling voting levers, we're fucked as a country.

All your opinion.

[Reverberator]

Sorry , I don't give a fuck about this , but to pull someone up over their spelling is really lame.

Stick to your politics and lose the I can spell better than you shite .... just makes you look petty.

[FORD]

Originally posted by cadaverdog

I have seen others here spread hatred and racial slurs but they are not censored .

I've seen those posts too. And they read exactly like yours, for some reason.

Are you just another alias of Lardbo/Hellbilly/Sagebrush/illiterate cross burning sister fucker?

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by FORD
I've seen those posts too. And they read exactly like yours, for some reason.

Are you just another alias of Lardbo/Hellbilly/Sagebrush/illiterate cross burning sister fucker?

Yeah thats me alright .
I could now go into detail about me fucking your sister while you were looking through the peephole choking your chicken and fantisizing I was drilling you,instead.
But then I would be sinking to your level.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by cadaverdog
Yeah thats me alright .
I could now go into detail about me fucking your sister while you were looking through the peephole choking your chicken and fantisizing I was drilling you,instead.
But then I would be sinking to your level.

Yeah, that's what I'm talking about....

This inbred is dealing with a short deck to be sure...

Watch now how he'll scream "censorship" as the reason NO ONE has bothered to answer his stupid little thread question...

I'm just relieved to know the cast from Deliverance can now access the interweb.....

Another fine thread, joebob!!!

How's the fishin' in them parts today?

[Steve Savicki]

And notice how a webbie hasn't responded to this thread yet.

Thanks for giving me a Monday morning chuckle, boys!:p

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by Steve Savicki
And notice how a webbie hasn't responded to this thread yet.

Thanks for giving me a Monday morning chuckle, boys!:p

Why do you allow a person who is obviously biased to moderate the very forum that requires an unbiased view?
The war is a volitile subject and requires an open mind to moderate.
You might as well appoint babys on fire to moderate there too.
He's open minded .

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by Steve Savicki
And notice how a webbie hasn't responded to this thread yet.

Thanks for giving me a Monday morning chuckle, boys!:p

Why do you allow a person who is obviously biased to moderate the very forum that requires an unbiased view?
The war is a volitile subject and requires an open mind to moderate.
You might as well appoint babys on fire to moderate there too.
He's open minded .

[Steve Savicki]

Originally posted by cadaverdog
Why do you allow a person who is obviously biased to moderate the very forum that requires an unbiased view?

Why do *I* allow???????
Bud, I'm just a regular member like you.
I'm not a mod, supermod, much less a webbie. I don't make decisions around here.
If I did...

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by Steve Savicki
Why do *I* allow???????
Bud, I'm just a regular member like you.
I'm not a mod, supermod, much less a webbie. I don't make decisions around here.
If I did...

Dude
I didn't mean to drag you into my personal fight with these assholes.
I was going to ask you something and changed my mind.
unfortunatly I failed to reset to delete your quote.
I started another thread here so I could piss these assholes off
a little more.
check it out.

[Warham]

If Steve made the decisions around here, well, let's just say...

Na, let's not.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by WAR
If Steve made the decisions around here, well, let's just say...

Na, let's not.

No one would be allowed to post unless first giving him 5 stars.

[Warham]

I can't even remember what kind of rating I've given Savicki.

I probably did give him five stars (without looking). He's our resident savant!

[LoungeMachine]

He went on a tear when his rating dropped to 4 stars...

I was watching CNN waiting for the reports of a madman in the watchtower armed and wanting his fifth star back!!

[Steve Savicki]

Originally posted by WAR
He's our resident savant!

http://p202.ezboard.com/Hi-Villagers...cID=1547.topic