Originally Posted by
Nickdfresh
Um, you display art in a gallery.
Yea, and the majority of "art" is "for sale". Your point?
You sell albums in stores, and when you give exclusive rights to some stores, it gives them an unfair advantage over others and eliminates my options as a consumer...
So what, it is their right to do so. You don't like the store they sell it in, don't buy it. By their sales, not many fans have that problem. If they lose you as a fan in the process, they have to live with it. The economic advantages of selling to Walmart far outweigh the risks for an act that big. Just ask Asshole Springsteen who takes the money, then badmouths it after to save his "street cred".
It's the Abby Hoffman principle. Laws don't always mean economic justice, in fact, sometimes they mean injustice. And I'd buy them on iTunes if iTunes offered actual CD-quality lossless downloads...
What "Justice" is needed here? It's a free market, they sell in the manner they chose to customers who chose to consume it of their own free will. There is no intervention needed here, they are selling goods like any other company.
I don't have any class...
Well ok, if you say so...
In any case, schools are like public utilities with the excuse being that choice is too monumentally expensive and unfeasible to achieve. I do wish there was more choice in this area at least as far as the types of education focused on being offered such as vocational...