This guy is more meticulous about it than is necessary.
He's using a tiny Paasche gun, but then again his example work area is one-tenth the size of a guitar.
You could use a small touch-up gun for the same shading effects, I don't know that you want so much of the diamondback pattern defined because to me and in my experience the more crisp the details are on something like this the less real it actually looks.
Animals in the wild, you never see them out flat in full detail. That's why I suggest going around corners and not having the mesh to directly flat on the surface when shading is so critical as this guy emphasizes in clip 1, 4:30.
The edges aren't completely important to invoke the image of a real animal.
He's using a tiny Paasche gun, but then again his example work area is one-tenth the size of a guitar.
You could use a small touch-up gun for the same shading effects, I don't know that you want so much of the diamondback pattern defined because to me and in my experience the more crisp the details are on something like this the less real it actually looks.
Animals in the wild, you never see them out flat in full detail. That's why I suggest going around corners and not having the mesh to directly flat on the surface when shading is so critical as this guy emphasizes in clip 1, 4:30.
The edges aren't completely important to invoke the image of a real animal.
Comment