Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: National debt to be higher than White House forecast, CBO says

  1. #1
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33

    National debt to be higher than White House forecast, CBO says

    National debt to be higher than White House forecast, CBO says

    By Lori Montgomery
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Saturday, March 6, 2010


    President Obama's proposed budget would add more than $9.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, congressional budget analysts said Friday. Proposed tax cuts for the middle class account for nearly a third of that shortfall.

    The 10-year outlook released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is somewhat gloomier than White House projections, which found that Obama's budget request would produce deficits that would add about $8.5 trillion to the national debt by 2020.

    The CBO and the White House are in relative agreement about the short-term budget picture, with both predicting a deficit of about $1.5 trillion this year -- a post-World War II record at 10.3 percent of the overall economy -- and $1.3 trillion in 2011. But the CBO is considerably less optimistic about future years, predicting that deficits would never fall below 4 percent of the economy under Obama's policies and would begin to grow rapidly after 2015.

    Deficits of that magnitude would force the Treasury to continue borrowing at prodigious rates, sending the national debt soaring to 90 percent of the economy by 2020, the CBO said. Interest payments on the debt would also skyrocket by $800 billion over the same period.

    Obama's tax-cutting agenda is by far the biggest contributor to those budget gaps, the CBO said. As part of his campaign pledge to protect families making less than $250,000 a year from new taxes, the president is proposing to prevent the alternative minimum tax from expanding to ensnare millions of additional taxpayers. He also wants to make permanent a series of tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration, which are scheduled to expire at the end of this year.

    "Over the next 10 years, those policies would reduce revenues and boost outlays for refundable tax credits by a total of $3.0 trillion," wrote Douglas W. Elmendorf, the CBO director. Combined with interest payments on that shortfall, the tax cuts account for the entire increase in deficits that would result from Obama's proposals.


    Obama is convening a special commission to bring deficits down to 3 percent of the economy, but the CBO report shows that Obama could accomplish that goal simply by letting the Bush tax cuts expire and paying for changes to the alternative minimum tax.

    Other policy changes, such as Obama's signature health-care initiative and a plan to dramatically expand the federal student loan program, would have significant effects on the budget, Elmendorf wrote, but they generally would be paid for and therefore would not drive deficits higher.

    Link
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    Banned
    132dB's At Your Service

    Member No
    25
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    05-21-2013 @ 07:57 PM
    Location
    20' Above Water
    Posts
    10,849
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,599
    Thanked 334 Times in 307 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    0
    HA when I was a kid the national debt then was so small by comparison in the billions, and they had a donations office to contribute to the national debt people actually gave to.

    Has there ever been a more thieving administration in our nations history?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  3. #3
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    HA when I was a kid the national debt then was so small by comparison in the billions, and they had a donations office to contribute to the national debt people actually gave to.

    Has there ever been a more thieving administration in our nations history?
    This is a Democrat/Republican problem, not just one or the other. Just for once, I'd like to see politicians vote for what's best for the country and not what they think will get them re-elected.

  4. #4
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:19 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,130
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,823
    Thanked 9,397 Times in 6,054 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Bet you both feel a bit dumb voting for Bush now...
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. #5
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    Bet you both feel a bit dumb voting for Bush now...
    Nope.

    What were the alternatives? algore? Or Kerry? Bush was certainly the lesser of evils.

    Just like McCain. I'm certainly not a political fan of his, but he would have been a damn sight better than the SpeechGiver in Chief we now have.

  6. #6
    Cunning Linguist
    DIAMOND STATUS
    jhale667's Avatar
    Member No
    7379
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    04-07-2016 @ 01:20 AM
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    20,929
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    8,152
    Thanked 4,110 Times in 2,874 Posts


    Rep Power
    82
    You're in complete denial.
    Grandpa Munster would have already run the country into the ground, or worse - the stress would have gotten to him and then we'd have the brainless bimbo Palin completely pushing the country over the cliff...yeah, that would have been better.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  7. #7
    Builder of Sites
    DIAMOND STATUS
    LoungeMachine's Avatar
    Member No
    6584
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    02-08-2016 @ 02:28 AM
    Location
    Milan to Minsk
    Posts
    32,555
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    4,111
    Thanked 3,705 Times in 2,513 Posts


    Rep Power
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBrian View Post
    This is a Democrat/Republican problem, not just one or the other. Just for once, I'd like to see politicians vote for what's best for the country and not what they think will get them re-elected.
    So you're for Campaign Finance Reform now?

    You oppose the Supreme Court's latest ruling?

    Nice to know

    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  8. #8
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by LoungeMachine View Post
    So you're for Campaign Finance Reform now?

    You oppose the Supreme Court's latest ruling?

    Nice to know

    Partly, yes.

    While I think corporations and unions should be allowed to donate to political campaigns, there SHOULD be limits far more imposing than there currently is. Politicians from both sides of the aisle rely on too much money from these entities.

  9. #9
    Builder of Sites
    DIAMOND STATUS
    LoungeMachine's Avatar
    Member No
    6584
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    02-08-2016 @ 02:28 AM
    Location
    Milan to Minsk
    Posts
    32,555
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    4,111
    Thanked 3,705 Times in 2,513 Posts


    Rep Power
    89
    Pull the fence post out of your ass.....

  10. #10
    The true JBC
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    kwame k's Avatar
    Member No
    24030
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last Online
    11-14-2018 @ 03:27 PM
    Location
    Holly, MI
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,302
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,369
    Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,690 Posts


    Rep Power
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBrian View Post
    Partly, yes.

    While I think corporations and unions should be allowed to donate to political campaigns, there SHOULD be limits far more imposing than there currently is. Politicians from both sides of the aisle rely on too much money from these entities.
    You're for government regulation now, too!

    Run Forrest, run.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  11. #11
    roth beer pest
    DIAMOND STATUS
    PETE'S BROTHER's Avatar
    Member No
    22706
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last Online
    06-02-2022 @ 11:33 PM
    Location
    arizona
    Age
    53
    Posts
    12,682
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    4,273
    Thanked 2,377 Times in 1,853 Posts


    Rep Power
    54


    Julius Peppers(notes), Defensive End, Chicago Bears
    "Oh, man. I know everyone's worried about how we're going to pay for this health care thing, but you should have me sooner. I probably could've gotten the Bears to pay for the whole damn thing."
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  12. #12
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:40 AM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,108
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,480
    Thanked 4,579 Times in 3,458 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBrian View Post
    Nope.

    What were the alternatives? algore? Or Kerry? Bush was certainly the lesser of evils.
    ....

    Oh, is that how you rationalize being fucking retarded?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  13. #13
    Perpetually Befuddled
    DIAMOND STATUS
    chefcraig's Avatar
    Member No
    3871
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    03-01-2017 @ 12:20 PM
    Location
    "A Confederacy Of Dunces"
    Posts
    12,172
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,724
    Thanked 4,052 Times in 2,583 Posts


    Rep Power
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBrian View Post
    While I think corporations and unions should be allowed to donate to political campaigns, there SHOULD be limits far more imposing than there currently is. Politicians from both sides of the aisle rely on too much money from these entities.
    It's a valid point, but I really don't see how any idea of campaign reform would be realistic in today's world. If a politician can be bought, then the influence peddlers (of which there are many) out there will simply find a way to circumvent the legislation. Remember, Prohibition did little to curb the country's taste for alcohol, and in this case, the same could be said for a politician's greed.

    Things get even worse when you explore the motivations of the candidates in the first place. In my own state of Florida, there seems to be one common thread running through the resumes of local politicians: they are all involved in real estate brokering. Is it any surprise then, that the state is being carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey, with developers and politicians sharing the spoils? The landowners, environmentalists (yes, I'm aware that you can't spell "environmentalist" without the word "mental") and the citizens of this state are left holding the bag, as natural resources are destroyed in the name of so-called progress. Believing that you can simply vote these scumbags out is an exercise in futility, as for each candidate elected there are dozens lining up to take their place. You can find them in the Yellow Pages under realtors.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. White House dog?
    By Seshmeister in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-05-2008, 12:41 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 04:29 PM
  3. The monkey in the White House
    By Hardrock69 in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 11:41 AM
  4. White House Shake-up
    By BigBadBrian in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 12:22 PM
  5. A Spy In The White House!
    By Nickdfresh in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-06-2005, 02:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •