Does it make sense to trim the Members roster?
Is there any benefit for the site to hold onto so many dead usernames entered in the members list?
I wonder if this would speed up the server.
There's like, 26 thousand entries, and I've seen over 1000 active tops at the time of the Reunion Tourdates announcement. That was 3 years ago.
Since then the USUAL daily traffic is now like, couple hundred members and twice that in guest visits. Although lately half that is more the story.
We have no banners or ads to sustain this joint, but if we did does a boast of member count gain better click earnings verses an Alexa site ranking?
I was looking at Sensible Shoes' member number of 25000-something, and I thought "wow, is there that many parisitic, 'bot-regged usernames here?" Because there couldn't possibly be even ten percent of that number active.
Is there any benefit for the site to hold onto so many dead usernames entered in the members list?
I wonder if this would speed up the server.
There's like, 26 thousand entries, and I've seen over 1000 active tops at the time of the Reunion Tourdates announcement. That was 3 years ago.
Since then the USUAL daily traffic is now like, couple hundred members and twice that in guest visits. Although lately half that is more the story.
We have no banners or ads to sustain this joint, but if we did does a boast of member count gain better click earnings verses an Alexa site ranking?
I was looking at Sensible Shoes' member number of 25000-something, and I thought "wow, is there that many parisitic, 'bot-regged usernames here?" Because there couldn't possibly be even ten percent of that number active.
Comment