ron paul=awesome/kickass?

[Satan]

Doug Wead from the Ron Paul campaign is on the Malloy show with guest host Brad Friedman this evilning (6/13). Check your local listings.

Or just click this link to listen live .... http://www.am950radio.com/listen-live

[Satan]

Wead pretty much admitted that this whole thing is as much about propping Junior as it is Ron himself anymore. Well, that should kill any illusion that anybody might have about Ron Paul saving the country.

Because Rand could no more save your country than I, the Devil, could save your soul.

[Dr. Love]

There are some things I don't like about Rand, but he votes a lot more like his Dad than most of Congress. Depending on your philosophical bent, that could be a good or bad thing.

[Dr. Love]

I certainly support him proposing legislation like this:

Rand Paul proposes bill to prevent warrantless drone surveillance


Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced legislation on Tuesday that would prohibit law enforcement agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct surveillance without a warrant.

“I’m not against technology per se,” he explained on CNN. “What I am for are the constitutional processes that protect our civil liberties. So, you know, it’s not like I’m against the police using cars or against them using airplanes or helicopters or robots. But I am for personal privacy for saying that no policeman will ever do this without asking a judge for permission.”

This year’s Federal Aviation Administration funding bill contained provisions that made it easier for law enforcement agencies to use drones within the United States. The new law requires the FAA to speed up the process by which it authorizes government agencies to operate drones. The law also requires the FAA to allow agencies to operate any drone weighing 4.4 pounds or less as long as it is operated within line of sight, during the day and below 400 feet in altitude.

The American Civil Liberties Union has warned the law could usher in an “era of aerial surveillance.” The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the 1980s that the Fourth Amendment did not categorically prohibit warrantless aerial surveillance of private property. The cost of purchasing, operating and maintaining aircraft imposed a natural limit on aerial surveillance. With the advent of drones, however, the ACLU doesn’t see law enforcement agencies being held back by the costs.

“A drone is a very, very powerful way of snooping on behavior,” Paul noted.

His Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act of 2012 would require the government to obtain a warrant before using drones to conduct surveillance. However, the government would not be required to obtain a warrant to use drones to patrol the national borders, when swift action was necessary to prevent “imminent danger to life,” or if there was determined to be a high risk of a terrorist attack.

“What I would say is that drones can be used if you have a proper warrant,” Paul told CNN. “But that means you go through a judge. A judge has to say there is probable cause of a crime. But I don’t want drones roaming across, crisscrossing our cities and our country snooping on Americans. And that’s the surveillance state that I’m very concerned about. And that’s what our bill would stop.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/12/rand-paul-proposes-bill-to-prevent-warrantless-drone-surveillance/

[LoungeMachine]

There are some things I don't like about Rand, but he votes a lot more like his Dad than most of Congress. Depending on your philosophical bent, that could be a good or bad thing.

This sounds alot like why many of US vote the way we do...and you ridicule us for it..

[Dr. Love]

I intentionally did not say I liked (or supported) Rand in that post because I haven't really made up my mind how I view him as a politician separate from his father. So the parallel you are drawing between me and the rest of you isn't really valid. If I do choose to support him it would be because I believe in him specifically.

I ridicule many of the people here because they vote more often against a person than for a person, and won't vote for someone they don't think is going to win, and because they all seem so willing to accept the non-choices that they are given. There is a very big difference between that and what I do. I firmly believe that a vote for someone out of conviction for someone I know will not win is more meaningful than a resigned vote for the lesser-of-two-evils simply because someone dislikes 1 candidate slightly less than the other. That, to me, is a wasted vote, because it does nothing but validate the idea that the public is willing to accept the idea that they only ever get 2 choices and that they are really, really crappy choices, at that.

That's why I don't give FORD any shit about Rocky Anderson. I respect that he is voting for someone other than Obama because he believes in the person more. FORD knows that Rocky won't win just like I knew that Ron Paul wouldn't win -- but that doesn't diminish the desire to advocate for people to consider an outside option. A lot of these people pick on Obama and Romney over such non-substantial, inconsequential, bullshit issues, never really acknowledging that they are basically the same candidate on the vast majority of important issues, and will likely govern the same, and won't change a damn thing.

I understand why you would take away what you did from my 1 ambiguous sentence. Hopefully you understand my point of view better.



Could be worse, I could post anti-gay stuff or racist stuff just to rile up jhale. Besides, I have taken plenty of ridicule from plenty of other people, including you, over my support for a candidate and message that would never win. I expect you can take my ridicule in return.

[ELVIS]

Rand thinks he can change the retardican party from within...

I disagree...

And is hair looks gay...

[Nickdfresh]

[jhale667]

Oh, this is f*cking hilarious...

Pastor: ‘God wants Ron Paul to be president… We must obey’


A California pastor says God has personally told him that Christians must vote for Rep. Ron Paul (R-CA) to be the next president of the United States.

“God wants Ron Paul to be President,” USA Christian Ministries Pastor Steven Andrew said in a statement released on Wednesday. “Paul is the only Christian still running who beat Obama in polls, but will Christians and pastors obey God?”

“We must obey God and vote for Christians.”


Andrew believes that President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney are not qualified for office because they “are deceived and would seek Satan because they refuse to make Jesus Lord.”

“Obama says to leave living babies to die who survive botched abortions, covers Jesus’ name and cross at Georgetown, fights unjust wars that result in Muslims persecuting Christians, and mocks God and our Founding Fathers’ Christian laws,” he explained.

“Jesus Christ is the second Person of the Godhead but, as a Mormon, Romney thinks: Jesus is a created being, the spirit brother of Lucifer; that men become Gods and that Christians are inferior people. Christians know Mormonism is Satanic,” Andrew added.

But “Paul is going to seek the LORD for the USA,” according to the pastor.

“Will you pray, ‘Father, who do you want for President? In Jesus’ name. Amen.’ When I prayed God told me, ‘Of the three, I want Ron Paul.’ It matches Scripture,” he insisted.



I'll post the video, but fair warning, the background music will make you want to punch babies...more than the idiot preacher does on his own...

[Satan]

He thinks Romney works for me? Should I be insulted??

[jhale667]

This just in from the lunatic asylum...

Oh, this is f*cking hilarious...

Pastor: ‘God wants Ron Paul to be president… We must obey’


A California pastor says God has personally told him that Christians must vote for Rep. Ron Paul (R-CA) to be the next president of the United States.

“God wants Ron Paul to be President,” USA Christian Ministries Pastor Steven Andrew said in a statement released on Wednesday. “Paul is the only Christian still running who beat Obama in polls, but will Christians and pastors obey God?”

“We must obey God and vote for Christians.”


Andrew believes that President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney are not qualified for office because they “are deceived and would seek Satan because they refuse to make Jesus Lord.”

“Obama says to leave living babies to die who survive botched abortions, covers Jesus’ name and cross at Georgetown, fights unjust wars that result in Muslims persecuting Christians, and mocks God and our Founding Fathers’ Christian laws,” he explained.

“Jesus Christ is the second Person of the Godhead but, as a Mormon, Romney thinks: Jesus is a created being, the spirit brother of Lucifer; that men become Gods and that Christians are inferior people. Christians know Mormonism is Satanic,” Andrew added.

But “Paul is going to seek the LORD for the USA,” according to the pastor.

“Will you pray, ‘Father, who do you want for President? In Jesus’ name. Amen.’ When I prayed God told me, ‘Of the three, I want Ron Paul.’ It matches Scripture,” he insisted.



I'll post the video, but fair warning, the background music will make you want to punch babies...more than the idiot preacher does on his own...

[Nitro Express]

If you are intelligent and a control freak you go into finance. If you are not so bright and a control freak you go into politics. If you are certifiably stupid and a control freak, you become a minister.

[Nitro Express]

If Ron Paul is going to be the Willy Wonka of the White House the ompaloompa is already running the house of representatives. I still think the chocolate will suck worse than Hershey's.

[Dr. Love]

I can't read that cyan text on tapatalk. Is there some reason the default color is not sufficient?

[jhale667]

You're the only person that cuntplains about it...

I can't read that cyan text on tapatalk.

Sounds like a personal problem...

Is there some reason the default color is not sufficient?

It's not all about YOU, bro!




But let me provide a synopsis: Idiot preacher says GAWD told him everybody has to be a Paulbot.