ron paul=awesome/kickass?

[kwame k]

The Supreme Court comes in and hands them over to Jeb Bush?

Even looking back to the '08 nomination of McCain......he had it all but wrapped up by Feb.

Remember, the term, "smoked filled room", came into being because of the Warren Harding Republican nomination.

The GOP likes to have a nominee early and taking it to the delegation floor of the convention isn't the image the GOP wants to send going up against Obama in the general. Fractured parties don't play well in the media or to the Party faithful. A fractured Party usually leads to Moderates or on-the-fence voters looking somewhere else.

That's why no matter what happens with Paul......he will never be the nominee, they won't allow it, period!

[LoungeMachine]

So what happens when Paul ends up with the most delagates ??

You're made a webbie here....

[hambon4lif]

but seriously, folks... with this bunch to choose from we're destined for another 4 years of Obama.

Alot of people have yet to snap out of denial to realize it, but that's exactly how it's going down.
There have already been subtle hints of this, but if you're quick, you'll catch them.
Two weeks before Huntsman cheesed out, he was asked by every single media outlet if his campaign was just a dry run for a 2016 shot. Every single last one of them.
I found that interesting why they would even ask him something like that.
Let's just say (for laughs, if nothing else) that Obama doesn't get re-elected. What would Huntsman run as in 2016? A Democrat this time?
They asked him that because even they've conceded that this pack of fucking brainless bozos (that the GOP scraped the absolute bottom of the barrel to find) don't have a fucking chance in hell.

Add to that the fact that somewhere in the last 30 years or so, Americans have developed a very bad habit of giving our Presidents two-terms, whether they deserve it or not, though alot of that can be attributed to how ridiculous going through this process every four years is.
Also add to that the fact that everyone seems to have forgotten how formidable 'campaign Obama' is. How he's done his job once he got it depends on your perspective, but the guy is undeniably a campaign ninja, He will completely annihilate and embarass these waterheads within the first 5 minutes.
The only one that has a shot of having Obama on the ropes and holding his feet to the fire is Ron Paul, but like Lounge is trying to tell everyone, he has no chance. Not because we don't believe in him or what he says. It's because his plans and ideas throw a monkey-wrench into 'the plan', one that has been in effect for quite some time now, and they will never let Ron Paul or anyone like him, get in the way of that. Never Never Never.

You really have to pay attention to catch these beams of light, but they're bright enough for you to see the writing on the wall.

[Nickdfresh]

Metal-cases ??

Fucking AYE!!!!

[Nickdfresh]

Ron Paul OWNED Santorum tonight...

That's sort of like bragging about giving a retard a weggie...not really saying much...

[ELVIS]

You're right on that one...

[ELVIS]

Campaign ninja ??

Well. Ron Paul is a campaign AK47...

[Seshmeister]

What are odds of a video coming out showing Santorum sucking off Bachman's husband backstage before a debate? 60-40? 70-30?

[knuckleboner]

You guys may disagree with my choice, but I'm the only one advocating for someone ... I don't hear much in the way of alternative vision from you guys. Unless you're still standing by Obama?

And if so, I'd wonder: Is it because you like Obama's record and performance, or because you don't want what you perceive as the "greater of two evils"?

a little of both.

i was never an obama is going to change the world kind of guy. but i thought he was the best of the bunch in 2008.

am i a little disappointed by his performance thus far? eh...in some instances. he certainly hasn't been perfect. but he's had a hellacious situation. started in the middle of the worst recession in 3 generations. (ron paul's the only candidate who can say he remembers when it was worse...) plus, make no mistake, the republicans were out since day one to impede his progress. not easy when every position you take is vigorously opposed because the other side wants to make you a 1-termer.

that said, while the stimulus bill was far from perfect, it's helped. no doubt. there are hundreds of thousands of police, firefighers and teachers who didn't join the unemployed thanks to it. hundreds of thousands of construction jobs who had work. hundreds of millions of Americans who had lower taxes because of it.

the American auto industry exists because the obama administation stepped up. and for very little net investment, GM is back again as the world's #1 car company. that's a helluva turnaround.

he wound down the 2 wars in a way that was responsible, but got the job done. could it have been quicker? sure. but it happened.

he killed osama.

he took out qaddaffi.

he repealed don't ask don't tell.

and he got the ball rolling on the first significant (though by NO means socialist) health care reform in about 100 years.

best president ever? no. definitely not. but out of the republican crowd of 2012, i'd take obama every time. (and i'd take obama's dog over bachmann.)

[hambon4lif]

What are odds of a video coming out showing Santorum sucking off Bachman's husband backstage before a debate? 60-40? 70-30?

Marcus has a face that looks like it's been used as a catchers mitt for cocks, so if it were reversed to have Michelle's wife blowing Sanitorium, you can kick those odds up to 80-20 easy.
90-10 odds says they try blowing each other at the same time and both fall off the couch.

[ELVIS]

What are odds of a video coming out showing Santorum sucking off Bachman's husband backstage before a debate? 60-40? 70-30?

60-40

But I wonder how many people in Scotland have that same thought...

[kwame k]

a little of both.

i was never an obama is going to change the world kind of guy. but i thought he was the best of the bunch in 2008.

am i a little disappointed by his performance thus far? eh...in some instances. he certainly hasn't been perfect. but he's had a hellacious situation. started in the middle of the worst recession in 3 generations. (ron paul's the only candidate who can say he remembers when it was worse...) plus, make no mistake, the republicans were out since day one to impede his progress. not easy when every position you take is vigorously opposed because the other side wants to make you a 1-termer.

that said, while the stimulus bill was far from perfect, it's helped. no doubt. there are hundreds of thousands of police, firefighers and teachers who didn't join the unemployed thanks to it. hundreds of thousands of construction jobs who had work. hundreds of millions of Americans who had lower taxes because of it.

the American auto industry exists because the obama administation stepped up. and for very little net investment, GM is back again as the world's #1 car company. that's a helluva turnaround.

he wound down the 2 wars in a way that was responsible, but got the job done. could it have been quicker? sure. but it happened.

he killed osama.

he took out qaddaffi.

he repealed don't ask don't tell.

and he got the ball rolling on the first significant (though by NO means socialist) health care reform in about 100 years.

best president ever? no. definitely not. but out of the republican crowd of 2012, i'd take obama every time. (and i'd take obama's dog over bachmann.)

I'd add to that the Auto-Industry has hired/ is hiring back most of the people laid off and they paid back most of the bailout money, too!

He's also put us back on the right track as far as foreign policy goes......he's willing to compromise and has been better at diplomacy than Dubya's, "You're either with us or against us.", cowboy diplomacy.

No terrorist attacks on our soil and key terrorists have been killed or jailed.

He's not my favorite President, either but considering the alternatives....he has my vote.

Newt has stated publicly that he'd send troops back to Iraq and invade Iran.....other than the fact he's a complete hypocrite and a first rate asshole....his war mongering leaves him out on that fact alone.

Mitt.....if he ran on his record he might have a chance but he's a self-serving lying douche bag who'd do or say anything to get elected.......A capitalist with no soul.......nope!

Ronny boy......I like about 60% of what he says and the other 40% scares the shit out of me and the fact that if he ran as an Independent [doubt it] he'd take away votes from Obama giving Mitt or Newt the Top Job......nope.

Paul will never be the GOP nom so he's a non-issue.

[Dr. Love]

a little of both.

i was never an obama is going to change the world kind of guy. but i thought he was the best of the bunch in 2008.

am i a little disappointed by his performance thus far? eh...in some instances. he certainly hasn't been perfect. but he's had a hellacious situation. started in the middle of the worst recession in 3 generations. (ron paul's the only candidate who can say he remembers when it was worse...) plus, make no mistake, the republicans were out since day one to impede his progress. not easy when every position you take is vigorously opposed because the other side wants to make you a 1-termer.

that said, while the stimulus bill was far from perfect, it's helped. no doubt. there are hundreds of thousands of police, firefighers and teachers who didn't join the unemployed thanks to it. hundreds of thousands of construction jobs who had work. hundreds of millions of Americans who had lower taxes because of it.

the American auto industry exists because the obama administation stepped up. and for very little net investment, GM is back again as the world's #1 car company. that's a helluva turnaround.

he wound down the 2 wars in a way that was responsible, but got the job done. could it have been quicker? sure. but it happened.

he killed osama.

he took out qaddaffi.

he repealed don't ask don't tell.

and he got the ball rolling on the first significant (though by NO means socialist) health care reform in about 100 years.

best president ever? no. definitely not. but out of the republican crowd of 2012, i'd take obama every time. (and i'd take obama's dog over bachmann.)

I think this kind of glosses over his first 2 years where he had majorities in the house and senate and pre-emptively conceded items to the republicans. And then, with the 2010 elections, he lost control of the house and close on the senate -- and he deserved to -- because he couldn't effectively make the case for where he wanted to go, and people were upset with his direction, and ultimately put the opposition in power. He could have campaigned from a position of power and authority to drive an agenda. Presidents in the past have done this much, much more effectively.

What you're saying sounds nice but I really think it's kind of apologetic about what happened and lets Obama off the hook. The buck stops with him. Leadership is about ownership, responsibility, and ultimately, accountability.

He hasn't owned the situation. He hasn't proactively pushed a vision to resolve the situation, so ultimately, he's accountable for the situation. It may have crashed before he became President, but he still could have owned it more effectively.

[Seshmeister]

As an aside the problem with signatures is that they don't last forever.

Now there are maybe 50 posts saying how they love the tits in your signature and for the next how many months people are going to think that they are homoerotic trekkies.

[Dr. Love]

That's how I troll

Plus the image I had got taken down unfortunately. I'm in transition looking for the next great sig.