Were the 2000's the worst era for hard rock?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Unchainme
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    • Apr 2005
    • 7746

    #31
    Originally posted by Seshmeister
    Their drummer.
    I was going to say him, and the bassist kind of interested me.

    again, it's not like their great or even good for that matter, they just have a slight bit of value to them.
    Still waiting for a relevant Browns Team

    Comment

    • kwame k
      TOASTMASTER GENERAL
      • Feb 2008
      • 11302

      #32
      Originally posted by Angel
      I stopped listening to mainstream shit a long time ago. I search out the Indies now... there's some good rocking bands out there, you just have to dig to find them.
      Couldn't agree more

      The nice part about social networking is you can find a relatively obscure band that just kills it. It's kinda like back in the day....head to the local record shop and find an obscure import or regional band that none of your friends know about and you're the one turning them on to it!
      Originally posted by vandeleur
      E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place

      Comment

      • Nitro Express
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Aug 2004
        • 32798

        #33
        The 90's and the 00's were pretty much a blur. Not much memorable in either decade.
        No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

        Comment

        • binnie
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • May 2006
          • 19145

          #34
          Originally posted by Unchainme
          I love ya binnie, but here's what I'm talking about:



          http://www.somethingawful.com/d/your...ystem-down.php
          I dunno, man, I guess it's all subjective.

          If we think about 'Classic Rock' or 'Hard Rock' as a genre, wouldn't we say that most of lyrics have a pretty limited subject matter: sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll? That's no bad thing - my point is that the number of 'great' lyricists in the genre is few. DLR, Bon Scott spring immediately to mind, because they put new spins on old cliches. But for the most part, hard rock lyrics spin the same old yarns.

          I actually think that the lyrics in B.Y.O.B are pretty decent. There aren't many heavy bands who would tackle the subject matter of 'Violent Pornography', and even fewer who'd write songs about the Armenian Genocide. What makes SOAD interesting is the contrasts - from war and politics to pogo sticks and banoffe pie. Unlike anyone else, really.

          As for Slipknot - some of that stuff is just uncomfortable, especially the early records. Corey Taylor was on fire back then: most people won't want to listen to songs about that kind of emotional/mental strife (which is fine), but that's not the same as those bands not being talented.
          The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

          Comment

          • Unchainme
            ROTH ARMY SUPREME
            • Apr 2005
            • 7746

            #35
            Originally posted by binnie
            I dunno, man, I guess it's all subjective.

            If we think about 'Classic Rock' or 'Hard Rock' as a genre, wouldn't we say that most of lyrics have a pretty limited subject matter: sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll? That's no bad thing - my point is that the number of 'great' lyricists in the genre is few. DLR, Bon Scott spring immediately to mind, because they put new spins on old cliches. But for the most part, hard rock lyrics spin the same old yarns.

            I actually think that the lyrics in B.Y.O.B are pretty decent. There aren't many heavy bands who would tackle the subject matter of 'Violent Pornography', and even fewer who'd write songs about the Armenian Genocide. What makes SOAD interesting is the contrasts - from war and politics to pogo sticks and banoffe pie. Unlike anyone else, really.

            As for Slipknot - some of that stuff is just uncomfortable, especially the early records. Corey Taylor was on fire back then: most people won't want to listen to songs about that kind of emotional/mental strife (which is fine), but that's not the same as those bands not being talented.
            Although I can't see it man, I respect your view on it. I struggle listen to it. I'll give you props though. A lot of the SOAD fans I had met back in the day were angst-ridden teens. You my friend, are clearly not that, and actually looked at the lyrics. .
            Still waiting for a relevant Browns Team

            Comment

            • binnie
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • May 2006
              • 19145

              #36
              Cheers, dude.

              I've been thinking: sometimes bad lyrics add to the songs. '80s Scorpions; early Poison; Motley Crue; even latter-day Ki$$. Plenty of cheese there, but it works.....
              The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

              Comment

              • Golden AWe
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Jan 2004
                • 34230

                #37
                Mainstream hard rock probably sucked...but some of the best progressive metal albums of all time were created...Mastodon, Opeth...Gojira, Isis etc. made great albums too, though they're not too familiar to me...Porcupine Tree.

                Last edited by Golden AWe; 01-26-2012, 02:12 PM.
                Originally posted by Cato
                Golden, why are you FAT?
                Originally posted by lesfunk
                Much like yourself as the Jim Morrison of Nazi bunker flies
                http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...TheDMCross.jpg

                Comment

                • FORD
                  ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                  • Jan 2004
                  • 58783

                  #38
                  Usually you can say that every decade has its timeless classics, and its useless crap.
                  In the 50's, you had Elvis, Chuck Berry, and Buddy Holly, while you also had Pat Boone and Fabian.

                  The 60's are remembered for The Beatles, the Stones, Hendrix, and the Doors (among others) but you also had Herman's Hermits, and countless one hit wonder bubblegum bands with dumb pseudo-psychedelic names.

                  The 70's - Zeppelin, Floyd, Aerosmith, Van Halen and punk rock vs all the sappy "singer-songwriter" shit the first half of the decade and the godawful disco shit in the last half.

                  The 80's - Once you lost Van Halen, The Police, and Black Flag all within the same year, it was all down hill from there. The late 80's had about three decent bands - U2, REM, and the 77s. Aside from that, you had hair band shit getting worse by every minute it was overexposed on eMpTyV, and the European "new wave" bands morphing into just more lame synth-disco. Best album of the late 80's (other than the previously mentioned bands) - NWA "Straight Outta Compton"

                  Same story in the 90's, pretty much. You had some new innovation in the first half of the decade. Then Kurt was dead, Layne might as well have been, Pearl Jam got into a fight with Ticketbastard, and by the time Soundgarden split up in 1997, there was nothing left but boyband crap and rappers who kept trying to remake "Straight Outta Compton" (and failing miserably). Garth Brooks was better than anything passing as "rock" from 1997 to 2000.

                  In the 2000's it has been even worse. The only decent records made have been those made by bands who were around way before 2000. Steel Panther was mentioned. What does that tell you? A parody band is better than any real band on the charts?? Some people liked The Darkness. I wasn't one of them, but then they were pretty much a parody band too.

                  Now here we are, 2 years into another decade, and the best albums so far have been bonus disks of "new" material on re-released old albums from The Rolling Stones and U2, and the impending release of the first album in 28 years from Van Halen, which also seems to rely heavily on material that they wrote over 30 years ago. Hopefully these records will inspire some new bands to pick up the slack, and maybe the labels will have the good sense to sign them? (Yeah, Universal Music Group - home of U2, the Stones, and Van Halen - I'm looking right at you)
                  Eat Us And Smile

                  Cenk For America 2024!!

                  Justice Democrats


                  "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                  Comment

                  • Mr Badguy
                    Full Member Status

                    • Jan 2004
                    • 3564

                    #39
                    I don't think the 2000's sucked as much as the 90's.

                    For a classic rock fan it was like a second golden age.

                    Excellent albums from Iron Maiden, Heaven & Hell, Rush, Motorhead, Journey,, Ki$$ (flame on), Rush, Alice Cooper, the list goes on.

                    So they might not be selling like they once did, but when did that ever mean that a record wasn't good?
                    sigpic

                    Sitting on a park bench!

                    Comment

                    • Golden AWe
                      DIAMOND STATUS
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 34230

                      #40
                      Originally posted by FORD
                      In the 2000's it has been even worse. The only decent records made have been those made by bands who were around way before 2000. Steel Panther was mentioned. What does that tell you? A parody band is better than any real band on the charts?? Some people liked The Darkness. I wasn't one of them, but then they were pretty much a parody band too.
                      How many 2000's albums from new bands have you actually bought? I think you haven't gone to too many new band gigs or festivals...if your impression of the 2000's is based on what sucky playlist "rock" radios play, and I think (just think, I don't know for sure) you're one of those guys who wants to lean on your old albums and albums from other old artists (nothing wrong with that, but sure your impression on 2000's music sure is worse in that case...)

                      I haven't enjoyed Lamb of God or Slipknot either. But even they have good live shows...and the better, on the festivals they may headline, there are smaller great bands to enjoy and get to know. Cheers!
                      Last edited by Golden AWe; 01-26-2012, 03:38 PM.
                      Originally posted by Cato
                      Golden, why are you FAT?
                      Originally posted by lesfunk
                      Much like yourself as the Jim Morrison of Nazi bunker flies
                      http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...TheDMCross.jpg

                      Comment

                      • Dave's Bitch
                        ROCKSTAR

                        • Apr 2005
                        • 5291

                        #41
                        I saw Lamb of God a few years back.They were actually pretty good live
                        I really love you baby, I love what you've got
                        Let's get together we can, Get hot

                        Comment

                        • Zing!
                          Veteran
                          • Oct 2011
                          • 2363

                          #42
                          Surprised no one has mentioned Rob Zombie. He had three albums in the 2000's that were all pretty good: The Sinister Urge, Educated Horses, and Hellbilly Deluxe 2. He may record commercial metal, but anyone that tours with Alice Cooper is okay in my book.
                          My karma just ran over your dogma.

                          Comment

                          • rockhead
                            Roadie
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 162

                            #43
                            All i can say is thanks christ steve harris asked Bruce to come back.

                            Comment

                            • binnie
                              DIAMOND STATUS
                              • May 2006
                              • 19145

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Dave's Bitch
                              I saw Lamb of God a few years back.They were actually pretty good live
                              'Sacrament' and 'Wrath' are bloody good albums, too.
                              The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

                              Comment

                              • Dave's Bitch
                                ROCKSTAR

                                • Apr 2005
                                • 5291

                                #45
                                Originally posted by binnie
                                'Sacrament' and 'Wrath' are bloody good albums, too.
                                Sacrament was good.Never actually heard Wrath.A few other albums I liked

                                Alestorm - Captain Morgan's Revenge
                                Children Of Bodom - Follow The Reaper
                                Blind Guardian - A Twist In The Myth
                                Anthrax - We've Come for You All
                                W.A.S.P. - Babylon
                                I really love you baby, I love what you've got
                                Let's get together we can, Get hot

                                Comment

                                Working...