You've posted a graph from a blog by a guy called Goddard who is apparently an IT professional. He's quoted by the hack journalist and vice versa.
A blog by an IT professional about climate science is less valid as a scientific source than you or I posting fucking anything here.
He makes claims in his headline that he doesn't then substantiate in his article.
I suspect if his graphs from fucking ages ago have any validity then it's because incorrect data from years ago has been fixed for the reasons outlined in the documentary I posted.
A blog by an IT professional about climate science is less valid as a scientific source than you or I posting fucking anything here.
He makes claims in his headline that he doesn't then substantiate in his article.
I suspect if his graphs from fucking ages ago have any validity then it's because incorrect data from years ago has been fixed for the reasons outlined in the documentary I posted.
Comment