It is Thanksgiving. I am running late. Stores have had their Christmas shit up for over a month now.
So here is my early (late) cuntribution to the Christmas War of 2015.
It is Thanksgiving. I am running late. Stores have had their Christmas shit up for over a month now.
So here is my early (late) cuntribution to the Christmas War of 2015.
Yikes! Even I, the Messiah am embarrassed by naked pictures of Myself as a baby
Yes Lord.
But the artist screwed up and left the mini-halo out of the picture. I would assume you would want the image to be accurate.
Which brings to mind a question......what kind of reaction do you get from peeps who see you walking around with a halo over your head, and a smaller halo floating in the air just in front of your crotch?
Does it make it difficult to get blowjobs from Mary?
Who is the other baby in the picture supposed to be. Looks a little older than baby JC. Perhaps John the Baptist, who was JC's cousin and born a few months before He was.
Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992
Yes. He is always depicted wearing what looks like a bearskin.
If there had been a Jesus character who was the son of god would they have a big cock?
It's a difficult question. Unlikely but assuming in the story despite all the evidence he wasn't actually gay then is there a need for a big dong when he isn't going to use it but the flip side is that as a deity who can do anything then wouldn't he choose to have a big dick? Especially when you know you are going to be put up in public in a loincloth.
Why would a baby have a big cock? He would have tripped over it when He started walking.
Well there is a happy medium.
Last edited by Seshmeister; 12-02-2014 at 09:17 AM.
The kid in the animal hide with the non hallowed penis is probably satan.
Originally Posted by Seshmeister
That should have been a scene right out of "Life Of Brian".
You would expect that to be the case. But perhaps the artist did not want to offend everyone by showing the 12th-century-depiction of Baby-John-Holmes.
Those people had funny ways they worshiped the baby Jebus.
You know, praying....and KNEELING...that sorta thing.
No ritual sacrifice. No fire. No tossing of babies against the rocks. No fun, according to the Old Testament.
Where are all the BA'AL worshipers, anyway?
Nope. I never wear fur.
Eternally Under the Authority of Satan
Christian pedophilia. No one is surprised, Kirsten.
Go yell at the painter of that piece of art and tell him he needs to get a fucking job.
That was Venus?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote