Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Wes Clark Made Case For Iraq War Before Congress; Transcript Revealed

  1. #1
    lucky wilbury
    Guest

    Wes Clark Made Case For Iraq War Before Congress; Transcript Revealed

    http://www.drudgereport.com/mattwc.htm

    XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX WED JAN 15, 2004 11:28:25 ET XXXXX

    WES CLARK MADE CASE FOR IRAQ WAR BEFORE CONGRESS; TRANSCRIPT REVEALED

    **World Exclusive**

    Two months ago Democratic hopeful Wesley Clark declared in a debate that he has always been firmly against the current Iraq War.

    "I've been very consistent... I've been against this war from the beginning," the former general said in Detroit on October 26.

    "I was against it last summer, I was against it in the fall, I was against it in the winter, I was against it in the spring. And I'm against it now."

    But just six month prior in an op-ed in the LONDON TIMES Clark offered praise for the courage of President Bush's action.

    "President Bush and Tony Blair should be proud of their resolve in the face of so much doubt," Clark wrote on April 10, 2003. "Can anything be more moving than the joyous throngs swarming the streets of Baghdad? Memories of the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the defeat of Milosevic in Belgrade flood back. Statues and images of Saddam are smashed and defiled."

    MORE

    Even the most ardent Clark supporter will question if Clark's current and past stand on the Iraq war -- is confusion or deception, after the DRUDGE REPORT reveals:

    TWO WEEKS BEFORE CONGRESS PASSED THE IRAQ CONGRESSIONAL RESOLUTION WESLEY CLARK MADE THE CASE FOR WAR; TESTIFIED THAT SADDAM HAD 'CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS'

    Less than 18 months ago, Wesley Clark offered his testimony before the Committee On Armed Services at the U.S. House Of Representatives.

    "There's no requirement to have any doctrine here. I mean this is simply a longstanding right of the United States and other nations to take the actions they deem necessary in their self defense," Clark told Congress on September 26, 2002.

    "Every president has deployed forces as necessary to take action. He's done so without multilateral support if necessary. He's done so in advance of conflict if necessary. In my experience, I was the commander of the European forces in NATO. When we took action in Kosovo, we did not have United Nations approval to do this and we did so in a way that was designed to preempt Serb ethnic cleansing and regional destabilization there. There were some people who didn' t agree with that decision. The United Nations was not able to agree to support it with a resolution."

    Clark continued: "There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we."

    More Clark: "And, I want to underscore that I think the United States should not categorize this action as preemptive. Preemptive and that doctrine has nothing whatsoever to do with this problem. As Richard Perle so eloquently pointed out, this is a problem that's longstanding. It's been a decade in the making. It needs to be dealt with and the clock is ticking on this."

    Clark explained: "I think there's no question that, even though we may not have the evidence as Richard [Perle] says, that there have been such contacts [between Iraq and al Qaeda]. It' s normal. It's natural. These are a lot of bad actors in the same region together. They are going to bump into each other. They are going to exchange information. They're going to feel each other out and see whether there are opportunities to cooperate. That's inevitable in this region, and I think it's clear that regardless of whether or not such evidence is produced of these connections that Saddam Hussein is a threat."

    END
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    lucky wilbury
    Guest
    http://www.drudgereport.com/flashjl.htm

    For Immediate Release
    Contact: Jano Cabrera
    Thursday, January 15, 2004

    LIEBERMAN STATEMENT ON CLARK IRAQ TESTIMONY

    MANCHESTER, NH -- Joe Lieberman issued the following statement in response to the Drudge Report's discovery of congressional testimony from September 2002 in which Wes Clark made the case for war in Iraq. The report provides evidence directly contradicting Clark's repeated claims that he has been "very consistent" on the war "from the very beginning."

    Statement by Joe Lieberman

    "Yesterday, Wesley Clark attacked me for pointing out his multiple positions on the war in Iraq. It is no longer credible for Wesley Clark to assert that he has always had only one position on the war - being against it. His own testimony before Congress shows otherwise.

    "He may think it is 'old-style politics' to point this out, but the only thing old here is a candidate not leveling with the American people. If we want to begin anew and replace George Bush, we need to level with the American people, which is what I have done in this campaign and throughout my career. You may not always agree with me but you will always know where I stand."

    #

    Yesterday on Good Morning America, Host Charlie Gibson told Wes Clark that "Joe Lieberman [is] saying Wes Clark had six different positions on the war."

    Clark responded, "Well, has he ever named the six different positions, Charlie? I meant that's just -- that's old-style politics. You can go back to my record. I've even been on your show - while I couldn't t when I was on CNN. But, I was consistently against this since the guys from the pentagon told me two weeks after 9/11 we were attacking Iraq. It didn't make any sense to me. And I have been very, very consistent on this. This was a war we didn't have to fight. It was an elective war. I have said it at almost every opportunity."

    END

  3. #3
    Shit don't stink
    Commando
    High Life Man's Avatar
    Member No
    232
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    01-22-2024 @ 10:31 PM
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,286
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    105
    Thanked 100 Times in 73 Posts


    Rep Power
    23
    And I found this:

    After Clark jumped into the race, Hugh Shelton, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said "integrity and character issues" were behind the decision to relieve Clark of his position as supreme commander of NATO. Shelton has yet to elaborate, but Clark's public actions have certainly provided good reason to question his integrity and character.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  4. #4
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-01-2012 @ 08:41 PM
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    23
    Yep.

    What's also interesting is that General Clark was headed nowhere in his military career untill Slick-Willie pulled some strings. He was passed over for General, which is typically the end of advancement in the officer corps.

    So how did he make it to 4-star you may ask???

    Good question.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. #5
    lucky wilbury
    Guest
    it's not only shelton that has come out againest clark. shawrzkopf,franks, and myers have come out againest him as well.

  6. #6
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-01-2012 @ 08:41 PM
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    23
    He's a tool.

    A real "man of character"!

  7. #7
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    He's shown on TV alot flipping pancakes at VFW and American Legion halls. He likes to flip-flop on the issues also. Nothing wrong with changing your mind, but this guy does it like algore does it......as the polls go.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Congress Can Stop Iraq War, Experts Tell Lawmakers
    By Hardrock69 in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2007, 10:01 AM
  2. Democrats: Congress May Not Fund Iraq Troop Surge
    By Nickdfresh in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-08-2007, 06:27 PM
  3. Servicemen Petition Congress To End Iraq Occupation
    By blueturk in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-26-2006, 08:56 AM
  4. Iraq War Vets running for Congress....as DEMOCRATS
    By LoungeMachine in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 03:15 PM
  5. Karl Rove revealed as source of info in Plume CIA case...
    By Hardrock69 in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 01:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •