Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Proof the moon doesn't exist!

  1. #1
    hitchworld1969
    DIAMOND STATUS
    WARF's Avatar
    Member No
    145
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    01-31-2022 @ 04:25 PM
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    15,316
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,849
    Thanked 2,500 Times in 1,468 Posts


    Rep Power
    61

    Proof the moon doesn't exist!

    THE MOON - The REAL Truth
    The authorities expect you to simply take at their word the absurd and unfounded story that there is a large mass orbiting the earth. Obviously we are expected to be mere sheep, going along with whatever the Thought Police would tell us. However, when one looks at THE FACTS, in an atmosphere free from bias and academic repression, one sees a very different story.


    False claims retracted!

    Throughout history, hundreds of absurd fables have been circulated regarding the moon. Most of these have since been discarded. For example, people used to speak about there being "a man in the moon", or about moon being made out of cheese (as recently as last year, I saw an animated film that was still promoting this latter absurdity). We rarely hear such things spoken of anymore. These fables, once asserted as true by the proponents of the moon hoax, were quietly discarded once proven absurd by revisionists. What does this tell us about the equally absurd assertions that are still being made about the moon? How can we believe anything that the Astronomically Correct establishment tells us, when they have been so obviously shown themselves prone to such intellectual dishonesty in the past? The fact that the story has exhibited such enormous variability over the years should automatically be a cause for doubt.
    No one speaks anymore of Richard A. Locke, a newspaper reporter who wrote a fantastic but wholly fabricated account of discoveries on the moon falsely attributed to the English astronomer Sir John Herschel. Locke reported that Herschel, using a telescope 24 feet in diameter (!), saw fabulous bat-like creatures, living in elaborate cities on the lunar surface. No less a newspaper than the New York Sun printed these reports on its front page as its most important news story! The whole moon hoax is based on such fanciful tales. That’s why I doubt most of it.


    Mathematical impossibilities
    Another impossibility that has always been an embarrassment to the scientific establishment is the obvious fact that an object as heavy as the moon, caught in the earth’s gravity, would inevitably come crashing down upon us at immense speeds. Responses to this argument from the Lunarists have always been weak, and always couched in that scientific newspeak designed to confuse the sincere questioner without actually saying anything.
    The establishment most often cites the work of Isaac Newton in support of its story. Newton is well known for coming up with entirely theoretical notions such as the Law of Universal Gravitation, and his more famous Laws of Motion which serve to gloss over the more obvious inconsistencies in the moon story. What he is less known for is his "extra-curricular" pursuits, which he kept quite secret during his lifetime but which have since been uncovered. Newton was a dominating figure in the Royal Society, a fellowship riddled with members of the various secret societies whose goal to dominate the world has already been outlined. Newton himself possessed copies of Rosicrucian manifestos, and, as is evident in his notes, had studied them thoroughly. Many of his biographers suspect that he shared the religious beliefs of many of his colleagues. It does not take a genius to conclude that these beliefs may have influenced his scientific reasoning.

    This is, of course, the reason why revisionists are excluded from academic institutions. The majority of scientists and professors of most universities are members of organizations such as these, as are most of the scientists who work for NASA. Those that are not realize that their livelihood depends on towing the establishment line, and therefore only a few have had the courage to speak out.

    However, eminent scientists, working in defiance of the establishment, have proven conclusively, using the most scrupulous methods, that if an object such as the moon really existed, it could not remain fixed in the sky for very long. Proactive arguments in support of this finding return to a closer examination of the original mathematical formula generally referenced when rallying to solidify the moon’s improbable existence:

    F = GMm/r2
    Where F = gravitational attraction
    G = the gravitational constant
    M = mass of one body
    m = mass of the second body
    r = distance between the two bodies
    Established by Newton himself, this numerical gem is based completely on the assumption that the moon travels in concentric circles around our planet. F (the gravitational attraction holding the moon to its "true" path) requires that r (the distance between the two celestial bodies) remains constant. Should the distance, r, decrease at any given moment, the gravitational force will increase in strength. When this event occurs the moon will be pulled towards this planet. According to Newton’s theory that a body set in motion remains in motion, such an incident would initiate a logical series of events with a singular chaotic result: propagated drawing of satellite to planet until the two massive bodies collide.

    However, even the most fanatical Lunarists no longer cling to the absurd notion that objects in the solar system travel in concentric circles. These so-called "scientists" have changed their story so many times, who knows what to believe anymore? The currently fashionable dogma is that the route followed by celestial bodies is not circular but a concave oval with the origin point at the centre (in the case of the earth, the sun; in the case of the moon, the earth) followed by a spiraling series of pathways. Thus, the moon is not maintaining a constant distance from our planet. Our orbiting satellite is forever oscillating towards us, drawing near then distant, in a continuous cycle. Each successive approach brings this massive wonder closer to our midst.

    In other words, the moon does indeed alter its distance from the earth. So why is it not widespread knowledge that the end – mathematically predicated BY NEWTON’S OWN FORMULA - has been anticipated and is drawing near? Due to some irrational explanation the moon has managed to defy those very laws of physics that were originally developed to justify its existence.

    The authorities expect us to believe a story that is prima facie absurd, and has been proven absurd by simple mathematical calculations. Yet they do not give us a single piece of reliable forensic evidence, nor an argument put forward by any expert free from institutional pressure.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    hitchworld1969
    DIAMOND STATUS
    WARF's Avatar
    Member No
    145
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    01-31-2022 @ 04:25 PM
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    15,316
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,849
    Thanked 2,500 Times in 1,468 Posts


    Rep Power
    61


    No photographs were ever taken of the moon until the 1850’s. Photographs such as this one, taken in 1852 by John Adams Whipple at the Harvard College Observatory, have been cited by Lunarists as proof of the existence of the moon. But considering the poor quality of the picture, this object could be anything, from an unusually round rock on a dark surface to someone’s bald head. We still require the help of self-appointed "experts" to tell us just what we’re looking at.



    There were no pictures of the alleged "far side of the moon" until revisionist research pressured the Lunar conspiracy to fabricate one in 1959. This picture was allegedly taken by the Soviet satellite Lunik III. Note that these are the same Soviets who massacred 4,000 Polish officers in the Katyn forest in 1940, then tried to blame the atrocity on the Germans at Nuremberg. Surely if the moon story had any truth to it whatsoever, the conspirators could have found a more credible source.

  3. #3
    hitchworld1969
    DIAMOND STATUS
    WARF's Avatar
    Member No
    145
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    01-31-2022 @ 04:25 PM
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    15,316
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,849
    Thanked 2,500 Times in 1,468 Posts


    Rep Power
    61
    This is clearly a propaganda hoax!

    read more FACTS Below!

    http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

  4. #4
    Banned
    Member No
    5226
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    06-13-2016 @ 10:02 PM
    Location
    .
    Posts
    12,707
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,428
    Thanked 1,438 Times in 1,119 Posts


    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WARF View Post
    No photographs were ever taken of the moon until the 1850’s.
    Holy fuck... HE'S RIGHT!

    Then if the Moon's not real, that means the Moon landing COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED!

    I KNEW IT! I was right!
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. Thanked Anonymous for this KICKASS post:

    WARF (10-14-2015)


  6. #5
    Redneck Army
    DIAMOND STATUS
    DONNIEP's Avatar
    Member No
    2737
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    12-01-2020 @ 08:53 AM
    Location
    Who the hell knows
    Age
    53
    Posts
    13,390
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,990
    Thanked 3,464 Times in 2,541 Posts


    Rep Power
    70
    But...but...I can see it. Here - from my own yard. Unless I'm drunk. Then I see all sorts of things.

    What I can't understand is why aliens build bases on a giant rock that regularly gets hit by other big rocks. Or rawks, as Early calls them. Seems like it would be a pretty dumb place to build your secret base so you could spy on the idiots inhabiting this planet.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  7. #6
    How did I get here?
    Full Member Status

    Phil theStalker's Avatar
    Member No
    649
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    07-20-2022 @ 10:16 AM
    Location
    Delightful Nights Inn
    Posts
    3,806
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 61 Times in 51 Posts


    Rep Power
    24
    Y'yknow da otha PLaN/ETS mmmoons DoN/'T gO CRaSHiNG iN oN THeM.

    aaND, THeY/'RE NoT Ex/PEcTED To.

    JUSS SAY/IN'


    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  8. Thanked Phil theStalker for this KICKASS post:

    WARF (10-14-2015)


  9. #7
    Fuck this and fuck that
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:58 PM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    58,671
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,391
    Thanked 6,281 Times in 4,711 Posts


    Rep Power
    143
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  10. 3 users say thank you to FORD for this KICKASS post:

    DONNIEP (10-14-2015),VetteLS5 (10-15-2015),WARF (10-14-2015)


  11. #8
    Fuck this and fuck that
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:58 PM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    58,671
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,391
    Thanked 6,281 Times in 4,711 Posts


    Rep Power
    143
    I don't think "Dark Side of An Unusually Round Rock" has the same ring to it though....


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-10-2013, 12:01 PM
  2. Dark side of the moon
    By So this is love in forum House of Music
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2013, 06:15 PM
  3. Why the fuck do newspapers still exist, and when are they going away for good?
    By BITEYOASS in forum Max's Non VH/DLR Related Stuff
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-15-2013, 04:40 PM
  4. Proof God Does Exist
    By Jagermeister in forum Max's Non VH/DLR Related Stuff
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-14-2012, 03:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •