Oh shut the fuck up, asscrack. Obama made the U.S. tax payer fork out over 1 trillion dollars on America's military, and, if you remember, swung his big black dick last January's State of the Union address where the only thing bigger than his cock was America's war machine being bigger than that of the next 10 countries combined. Obama also gave home to as many billionaires as the next five countries combined. He allows for public capital investment in transportation and water infrastructure to be slashed by 23%, he's made further cuts to education, health care and other comparable social programs.
Both parties, even pussy slave FORD's master Bernie are a fucking cancer to America. Does not mater who gets elected catastrophes will be inflicted on the population, and, of course, no one will ever be held responsible. So just shut the fuck up, okay?
Kristy, you're beyond your depth. And you know I think you're very well beyond the depth of most here.
Please look up Miller Trust and get back with the rest of us.
Respectfully.
You think your cocksucking GOP is any better?
What the fuck do I care? Let America expand its military as it cuts investment in transportation and water infrastructure, axe education, health care, and other comparable programs. Trump can't make it any worse. Allow for the banks under Trump give the world another financial disaster and a global economic crisis. No one will be punished under his regime...er, administration. Let Trump allow for the manipulation of exchange rates to swindle people of their homes, allow him to get America in more wars it can handle based on lies; allow for the CIA to continue to brutally torture prisoners and then cover it up. Even if Hillary wins, no one will be prosecuted, let alone convicted. Let Trump dictate what happens to America's crumbling social system and subordinate all that money right onto the god damn interests of the financial and corporate elite. Trump's criminal cabal can't be any worse than Obama. Let America's infrastructure and the country rot. I no longer care. After all, that is what capitalism is all about.
Trump's gonna build a Big Ass Wall.
And is it really torture if you round up a bunch of bad dudes who run around with terrorists and then fuck em up a little to get them to talk?
American by birth. Southern by the grace of God.
Yes. Yes it would be.
Well, all I can say is I hope we're torturing the living shit out of these ISIS fucks we're rounding up. Medieval shit - ripping off fingers, gouging out eyeballs, chopping Bawllz off, you know - the good stuff. And then burying them in the desert. Seriously, there's a lotta dirt over there and nobody is gonna miss a few thousand psychos.
And Trump's gonna build a Wall. Big Ass Wall. He oughta chrome plate the other side of it so people go blind just from looking at it.
No.
And don't hand me: 'From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs' , 'Greed bad' line of thought.
Rubio stated that Planned Parenthood created “an incentive for people to be pushed into abortions so that those tissues can be harvested and sold for a profit.” Planned Parenthood Greedy capitalists? Yes.
Clinton Foundation Greedy capitalists? Yes.
Berkshire Hathaway cut 2,500 jobs with their merger when Trump has been expanding his enterprise. Trump has been doing this when the market has retracted, even with quantitative easing and low interest rates.
And don't read anything into that. Trump is FDR in my opinion, as a politician.
Baird's book was hard for me to get through simply because I'm not a fan of statism. I don't like where capitalism has led to greed in that line of thought, by government selection. At the same time a company like Haliburton is the only company that has the capability to to provide measured and tested professional services.
Accountability and and common sense are missing from the process. We can agree or disagree on strategy but when I offer this simple comparative solution on immigration I would like your response because it has nothing to do with greed or party affiliation.
Compare this:
When you are a child and someone sets 2 dozen chocolate covered glazed doughnuts and 1 gallon of chocolate milk in front of you what do you do?
Do you do the same thing as an adult?
I'm simply suggesting with immigration we need to grow up.
Respectfully.
Well she ain't gonna like that...
Naw, he just Googles random shit.
Fucking framer.
Who cares about business venture flops? If one doesn't work out you move on to the next. Big deal.
With other peoples money - soon maybe yours?
Chimp and Cheney were both serial failures in business. In fact, Cheney had pretty much driven Halliburton into the ground during his reign as CEO, and only saved them by starting his PNAC wars and sending billions of dollars worth of no-bid contracts their way. Thus pulling his own retirement fund (stock shares) out of the red in the process.
What's worse than those two? Another failed businessman with NO political experience at all.
Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992
At least Hitler could paint, what are Trump's talents?
Apparently he can state what he likes and some people believed it but it doesn't make it true.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/uns...enthood-video/
Ok, so would a career politician or a guy who has only ever had successes in the business world be better? There's always a risk in any business venture. You take the risk hoping you'll reap some reward. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. My venture into the car bidness may not work out. That car might sit here a year. Or I might lose my ass on it. Or, maybe, I'll sell it and turn a profit. Then I'll buy another car, flip it, and maybe buy two at a time. And then maybe one day I'll own my own crappy car lot here in town. Of course, I'm not taking out a loan to fund my bidness but a lot of businesses do just that. And the banks spread the risk around cause they know some of those are gonna fail.
Now, who wants to buy a car?
Here is a photo of Matilda Sandahl
Why? No reason. Well, other then it's more informative than what slave SESH has posted and will continue to post on Trump.*
*same goes for slave FORD but I suspect most of you already knew that
Is there NO angry, old white guy slave FORD can post that will set the record straight?
Buh...buh...buh mastur burnie gonna giv muh fur pussy un weed wit' muh kollege eddcuation!
At least they will be educated.
He would be worth more now if he had put his money in a simple index fund.
From Fortune magazine, hardly a hotbed of radical commies...
http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/
This was the original fortune which was mainly built on his and his dad's manipulatation of government property grants.
I'm honestly surprised you guys still don't know this yet or do you just pretend???
This is a terrible advert. Of all the millions of things you could attack Trump on they choose this?
Or was it an advert for Trump? Who knows with these people...
Why security experts called Donald Trump’s response to the Belgium attacks ‘preposterous’
By Peter Holley and Lindsey Bever March 22 at 4:59 PM
Former homeland security secretary Michael Chertoff slammed Donald Trump’s response to the Brussels terror attacks on Tuesday. (AP)
For months now, Americans have wondered whether Donald Trump’s most controversial foreign policy proposals — such as closing U.S. borders to Muslims and extracting information from terrorism suspects using techniques deemed to be torture — were anything more than campaign bluster.
In the hours after bombings that killed dozens in Brussels on Tuesday, those statements took on new gravity, as the Republican front-runner was asked how he would respond to a similar attack if he were president.
“I would close up our borders to people until we figure out what’s going on,” Trump said Tuesday morning on Fox News. “We have to be smart in the United States. We’re taking in people without real documentation, we don’t know where they’re coming from, we don’t know what they’re — where they’re from, who they are.”
Republican front-runner Donald Trump calls Brussels "a disaster," the morning after deadly blasts rocked the Belgian capital. Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton urges the U.S. to "reaffirm our solidarity with your European friends." (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)
During an appearance on NBC’s “Today” show, Trump reiterated his commitment to using waterboarding to gain information from terror suspects in custody.
“Frankly, the waterboarding, if it was up to me, and if we changed the laws or had the laws, waterboarding would be fine,” Trump told Savannah Guthrie and Matt Lauer when asked about what techniques he favored. “If they could expand the laws, I would do a lot more than waterboarding. You have to get the information from these people.”
Experts across the political spectrum harshly criticized Trump’s statements.
Appearing on Fox News to discuss the attacks in Belgium, Michael Chertoff, who was the secretary of homeland security in the George W. Bush administration, labeled the candidate’s ideas “preposterous.”
“First of all, we have a much, much tougher refugee program than the Europeans have,” Chertoff said. “The problem the Europeans have is people showed up on their doorstep — hundreds of thousands, coming directly from the region. That does not happen in the U.S. We check people very carefully before we admit them as refugees.”
Chertoff — who served as secretary from 2005 to 2009 — added that it’s not impossible for someone to slip into the United States and carry out a major terror attack. But, he said, improvements in the country’s visa waiver program and officials’ ability to review data make it “much much harder in the U.S.”
“On the other hand, if you look historically back at people who carried out terrorist attacks in the U.S., many of them didn’t start out as Muslims,” Chertoff said.
“The idea that you can identify people who are a risk based upon their religion or the way they look is completely fallacious. It’s like going after cancer with a meat axe instead of a scalpel.”
During an appearance on MSNBC, terrorism expert Malcolm Nance said Trump’s “bluster” in the wake of Tuesday’s attacks was hampering U.S. intelligence and the armed forces.
“Donald Trump right now is validating the cartoonish view that they [Islamist militant groups] tell their operatives and that they tell their terrorists,” Nance said. “That the United States is a racist nation, xenophobic, anti-Muslim, and that that’s why you must carry out terrorist attacks against them.”
Nance said that type of rhetoric is detrimental to global counterterrorism missions.
“There are intelligence officers right now that are going to have to contend with their partners over what’s being said during the U.S. presidential race,” he told MSNBC. “It’s irresponsible, and it needs to stop.”
Cruz got busted a couple weeks back for putting a "soft core porn" actress in one of his commercials. So somebody in his camp probably thought if that hurt Ted, it would hurt Trump worse to show actual naked pictures of his third wife. Though Mrs Trump 3.0 was a professional model, and it seems obvious that picture was professionally done, so it's probably not much of a shock to her or her arrogant assed husband that somebody would post it on line.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)