Watch as the F A T Fanta bag of corrupt shit bombs
Watch as the F A T Fanta bag of corrupt shit bombs
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Watching trump live on sky in North Carolina ... big FAT ginger bloke with a I love sammy sign with the sammy crossed out and trump written underneath....... donnie is that you buddy ??
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
DONNIEP (10-21-2016)
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Vandy is David Cameron?
ALL limeys are pig fuckers.
It's what they do all day long.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
vandeleur (10-21-2016)
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
vandeleur (10-21-2016)
DONNIEP (10-21-2016)
Lake Charles. Actually I have a better chance of making it to the cockpit than the average passenger. My niece works for American Airlines. But if I started acting the fool or started talking stupid shit my ass would be thrown off the plane in a heartbeat just like anybody else.
As far as Trump's inexperience I'd rather take a chance on him fucking up than vote for her knowing what she's all about.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Reagan was trailing Carter by 3 points among likely voters before the only Presidential debate held that cycle, which took place one week before the election in November of 1980 (not 1979, despite whatever the Matrix above claims). Reagan's numbers had been rising slowly but steadily in the weeks leading up to the debate.
Reagan had a post-debate bounce. No doubt about it.
The problem with the comparison between that and today is that Trump was 2-3 points behind Hillary prior to the first of three debates. Trump's numbers have dropped with each subsequent debate, so the math for Trump has been going in the wrong direction, and there hasn't been a substantive October Surprise as of yet to fell Hillary.
Think about it.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Terry, I will expect your concession speech on here as soon as it's official!
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Terry (10-21-2016)
Oh, should the polling prove wrong, I'll have a strong interest in finding out why in terms of how the samples and interpretations ended up being so far off the mark.
Were I wagering with you, right now I'd bet on Hillary. And if the result on Election Day proves to be Trump, I'll revisit the thread and readily admit to you I was wrong. In addition, should that (Trump winning) come to pass, I'll accept the results
I'm fairly interested in the state-by-state outcomes. Hell, even if Trump just wins Michigan, I'll revisit this thread and admit you were right about that. I don't have a vested interest in proving what you said incorrect, nor will I derive any satisfaction should you be proved incorrect.
Last edited by Terry; 10-21-2016 at 07:56 PM.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/donald...145721448.html
Donald Trump found himself ahead in three national polls Friday morning.
The Republican presidential nominee held a lead of 1 point in the Investors Business Daily/TIPP tracking poll over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in a four-way race that included Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein. Trump led Clinton 41% to 40% in the poll.
Trump also held a 2-point lead in the right-leaning Rasmussen poll, also in a four-way race, in which he had a 43% to 41% edge over Clinton.
And in a two-way race, the Los Angeles Times/USC tracking poll found him up 45% to 44% over the former secretary of state.
Trump has traditionally fared better in those three polls than in others conducted during the cycle.
He is still trailing by a considerable amount in the RealClearPolitics polling averages. In the four-way race, he trails Clinton by 6 points. In a two-way race, he is behind Clinton by 6.3 points.
And in Business Insider's latest electoral map projection, Clinton has enough electoral votes to secure the presidency.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
But a Clinton staffer sees it differently:
http://www.cleveland.com/politics/in...ml#incart_2boxThe Clinton campaign appears to feel good about its progress in Ohio. In a memo obtained by cleveland.com this week, state director Chris Wyant declared that Clinton "won the first days of early voting."
Though Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said this week that requests for absentee ballots are down compared to this point during the 2012 election, Wyant, in his memo, noted that a high number of those requests are coming from five traditionally Democratic counties that are expected to favor Clinton over Trump this fall.
Vonny, what will happen to all of you angry, white, males if Grumpy Trumpy loses?
I wonder why they're still calling Trump the Republican candidate when the Republican party wants nothing to do with him and he wants nothing to do with them. Probably has something to do with money. This nonsense about him not accepting the election results is a total non issue. It's been done before. If Trump loses we can always say he didn't and Hillary was never elected just like they have done with W all these years. Gore lost. Deal with it.
Poor 'faggerslob. His Californian education has once again taken the best of him.
Because they can't bring themselves to admit that Hillary is a Republican, and always has been. Despite the cartoonish image created by Mush Limpdick & FAUX Noize, she's been playing for their side since the first days she doorbelled a district for Barry Goldwater.
Hell, she even kept his campaign logo!
Instead of attempting to counter my commentary with an opposing view point you fall back on junior high level name calling. Because of this I have no idea what part of my commentary you're referring to. If you're going to pretend you're an intellectual you might want to go with a different strategy.
One of these days you're going to wake up and realize we don't really have a two party system here. It's obvious both parties are pulling for Hillary. To me that's another good reason to vote for whoever's running against her that has a realistic chance of winning. Unfortunately for all of us that person is Donald Trump.
There's a difference between the beltway "Democratic" party (infected by the Koch funded right wing DLC) and the grass roots Democratic party which still exists outside of that brainwashing beltway bubble. Sadly the DLC is a literal cancer which has metastisized into other parts of the country, but there's still hope. We have Bernie. We have Elizabeth Warren. We have the Congressional Progressive Caucus - which Bernie founded while he was in the House, and still has a lot of members he can be proud of carrying on the good work since he moved to the Senate. Russ Feingold will get his seat back in this election.
REAL Democrats ain't dead yet. Real Republicans (at least on the national level) apparently died out with Eisenhower. We had a few up here in Washington state. Guys I would run into at political events or just general community stuff. They were good guys who just happened to be wrong on a few issues, but you could discuss it reasonably with them.
Those guys all retired from their party when the neocons (and then the teabaggers) took over. They don't want any more to do with THAT Republican party than I do.
I'd like to see BOTH parties make a comeback. Or, if the cancer can't be cured, pull the plug and replace them with something else. I can always go with the Green Party, but I damn sure hope nobody starts an Orange Party (centered around Drumpf's bullshit) because that would be entirely the wrong direction.
Ok, point me to the party that's gonna build a big ass wall on our southern border, stop the flow of illegals from simply trapsing in and getting FREE shit, stop all this Moozlim ass kissing - including Saudi Arabia, crack down on crime big time, gut welfare so that we can increase benefits to the people who really need it, rebuild our military into the biggest baddest assed bunch of kick ass men and women with the biggest guns and planes and ships the world has ever seen, provide healthcare that is actually affordable (remember kids, if your deductible is 12 grand and everything applies to the deductible then you're self financing your healthcare and enriching the insurers left in the exchanges and you're getting NOTHING for your money except the ability to dodge the penalty for not having coverage), stop the flow of jobs out of this country, reduce gubment regulations on business that do nothing but put money in foreign hands, rebuild the middle class, scare the living shit outnof the rest of the world so they do exactly what we tell them to when we tell them to do it, oh yeah and I'd like free Beerz too.
Which party is for all that and actually has a chance of being elected? None? Well there's always secession.
I'd rather see political parties outlawed altogether. How do we benefit from having a two party or even four party system as opposed to every candidate being an independent? You can't agree with anyone on everything. Why can't we have candidates that think independently instead of following the party line? We should shit can the electoral college bullshit too. Popular vote winner wins the election. We could still hold primaries but instead of one candidate from each party getting the nomination we could take the top 4 or top ten even. Considering the fact you can write in anybody you want we have millions of choices now.
Von Halen (10-23-2016)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)