Originally Posted by
cadaverdog
I read that. Here's the logic they use to debunk the story.
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
Does not longer owning stock in the company preclude Giustra from brokering the deal for cash money from the company? Do you have any proof Giustra didn't broker the deal? Why did he donate that much money to the Clinton Foundation in the first place? Notice how they mentioned when he sold off his stock because that helps their bullshit story but they don't include when he made the donations? Is it because it was a lot closer to the time the deal went down? Off course it was otherwise they would have included that fact.