Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 81

Thread: Neonazis Love Trumps uncomdemnation

  1. #41
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Va Beach VH Fan View Post
    I agree in retrospect that the Dems put all of their eggs, in a DNC point of view, into the Hillary basket WAAAAAY too early. Their bias towards Hillary wasn't even hidden, it was TOO obvious....
    The "because it's her turn" slogan may be one of the worst ideas in electoral history.

    The Nitro statement about people voting for Trump because 'it couldn't get any worse than it already was' is exactly correct and the same reason that Brexit too happened, both on very narrow majorities but anyhoo.

    That people could think that things couldn't get any worse is astonishing. Things can always get much much worse. I wonder if it's a lack of knowledge of history but then in both the Trump vote and Brexit it was the old people that voted for it. Here's a thought after another atrocity in Spain yesterday, terrorist murders in Europe are a small fraction now than they were in the 1970s. Public disorder, killings in the US, again a small fraction of what they were.

    Bullshit however is up big time.
    Last edited by Seshmeister; 08-18-2017 at 08:08 PM.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #42
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    What got Trump elected was people were just tired of career politicians. They were willing to give an outsider a chance for the simple fact that it couldn't get any worse than it already was. Simple as that. It's not that Trump was that great it's that Hillary stunk so bad. The Dems shot themselves in the head running that bitch. Would Trump have beaten Bernie or someone else? Maybe not.
    Apparently, at least in terms of the popular vote and the registered voters who bothered to turn out, three million more people weren't tired of career politicians than the ones who were. At least in terms of the choice being Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

    Could Hillary have been beaten by anybody other than Donald Trump?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  3. #43
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Va Beach VH Fan View Post
    I agree in retrospect that the Dems put all of their eggs, in a DNC point of view, into the Hillary basket WAAAAAY too early. Their bias towards Hillary wasn't even hidden, it was TOO obvious....

    That said, what would (or COULD is the better way to phrase it) she have done in her first six months in office that would have been so horrible, especially considering how obstructionist the Republican Congress was throughout the Obama presidency?

    Raise taxes on millionaires? Nope, it would be blocked....

    Attempt to tweak Obamacare? Nope, it would be blocked....

    Infrastructure? Nope, it would be blocked....

    The only thing she probably could have done is nominate Garland to the Supreme Court (assuming), although the Republicans would make that as painful as possible before finally relenting....
    Had she been elected, Congressional investigations over The Clinton Foundation and everything else under the sun would have taken off immediately.

    However, if the Congressional Republicans approached those hypothetical investigations with the same competency as they did with the "repeal and replace" health insurance reform, Hillary would have had little to worry about.

    I mean, 7 years to get their shit together, they control all three branches of government and they can't even convincingly explain their strategy, rollout, funding/financing and the basic math of it in a way that convinced enough people it would be worth supporting? McConnell couldn't even get the fucking VOTES in line? Some "Master of the Senate"

    Thankfully these republicans are proving to be as inept, disorganized and dysfunctional as the democrats: if either faction actually had their shit halfway together, they could possibly do us all some real damage.

  4. #44
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    I try to avoid being in a bubble and to read stuff from all sides, I think that's important.

    This just popped up on my feed and it really just shows the ridiculous point things have got to now...

    http://theconservativetruth.com/just...ayers-dollars/

  5. #45
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    I try to avoid being in a bubble and to read stuff from all sides, I think that's important.

    This just popped up on my feed and it really just shows the ridiculous point things have got to now...

    http://theconservativetruth.com/just...ayers-dollars/

    I think it's important to read informed commentary/articles/editorials from a wide range of viewpoints. Bubble-groupthink, regardless of which end of the political spectrum it encapsulates, isn't useful for much other than reinforcing beliefs one already holds to be true. You have to be prepared to challenge the assumptions you have made, as it's pretty tough to learn anything new if you already think you know it all.

    The key word, though, is "informed" as in verifiable information. As opposed to a reality created from opinion-based perceptions, where the opinions often can't be articulated by the opinion-holders as to...you know...WHY they hold those opinions to be true, what FACTS they have utilized in formulating those opinions. I think what I'm really describing are belief-based opinions derived from faith-based facts in terms of the ridiculousness of what is passing for 'news' these days in some quarters.

    You know, how many times has Sean Spicer or Huckabee Sanders made a glib reply along the lines of "well, the President believes it to be true" when asked about Trump's incorrect assertions on a number of issues? So, therefore, if somebody only believes strongly enough in something that has been proven demonstrably false, it isn't a lie if somebody keeps repeating the untruth because their level of belief in the falsehood is unshaken? Where the fuck does that leave us?

  6. #46
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    Had she been elected, Congressional investigations over The Clinton Foundation and everything else under the sun would have taken off immediately.

    However, if the Congressional Republicans approached those hypothetical investigations with the same competency as they did with the "repeal and replace" health insurance reform, Hillary would have had little to worry about.

    I mean, 7 years to get their shit together, they control all three branches of government and they can't even convincingly explain their strategy, rollout, funding/financing and the basic math of it in a way that convinced enough people it would be worth supporting? McConnell couldn't even get the fucking VOTES in line? Some "Master of the Senate"

    Thankfully these republicans are proving to be as inept, disorganized and dysfunctional as the democrats: if either faction actually had their shit halfway together, they could possibly do us all some real damage.
    Most of the US Congress are crooks. There really is no difference regarding the Dems and Reps as far as corruption goes. I don't know if both parties or even the federal government will survive the corruption and scandals. It really has become a joke. We are witnessing devolution in progress.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  7. #47
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    You really need campaign spending limits. It's surprising that the people in there at the moment don't get tired of begging for money 6 hours a day and vote for it, wouldn't you?

    The fact they don't shows that deep down they know that the one real skill they have over potential opponents is that they are better at raising money.

  8. #48
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    Most of the US Congress are crooks. There really is no difference regarding the Dems and Reps as far as corruption goes. I don't know if both parties or even the federal government will survive the corruption and scandals. It really has become a joke. We are witnessing devolution in progress.
    In practical terms, far as legislation goes, neither major political party in the US has a monopoly on wisdom - nor the interests of the non-moneyed classes at heart - as far as I can see.

    In the end, it tracks back to what Sesh said about campaign spending limits, along with the harm Citizens v. United did in legalizing the opening of the financial floodgates: you're loyal to the God that feeds you. If I were a politician and my principal/majority donors were Wall Street financial houses or ideologue billionaires like the Koch brothers, you'd better believe I'd make sure their wants and desires were taken care of before everyone else's.

    When this whole recent idea of Kid Rock running for the Senate was floated...if it is just a publicity stunt on Rock's part or not, when I take a look at the bulk of people in Congress these days, I'm not seeing or hearing The Astounding Wisdom Of Elected Democracy in action. What I'm seeing largely consists of a bunch of empty suits with law degrees in their background who managed to cobble together victories in no small part because voter apathy is rampant, where winning 55% percent of the vote in any given race (when only 60% of those who could vote actually turned out to do so) can now be called a 'mandate' and the objective of the elected official is to live high on the hog off of the perks of the public teat as long as he/she can, while making sure to grease the donor class with the laws they want passed so after the career in elected politics ends the politician can get a safe landing as a lobbysit or sit on multiple corporate boards or get a job with the televised pundit class...or all three...and then go on to make some REAL big money.

    Put another way, I'm not exactly overwhelmed with a sense of awe when I see McConnell, Ryan, Rubio and the like on television. EVen Senators I would tend to agree with more ideologically such as Warren and Sanders have been utterly ineffective when it comes to actually implementing the ideas they so boldly and passionately speak of.

    In a way, though, it's just a reflection of where we are as a nation. One way or the other, we usually end up getting the kind of democracy we deserve.

  9. #49
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    I think the US and the UK have two of the shittiest systems of democracy because we were early adopters.

    Hardly anyone else has these stupid first past the post, pretty much 2 party systems. Everyone else learned from our mistakes and did it better...

  10. #50
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Yes, but at least your Prime Minister has to have enough wits to stand up to Question Time and a thorough grilling on a semi-frequent basis.

    Frankly, when I look at such Presidents as Ford, Reagan, GW Bush and Trump, I don't think any of those guys would have lasted (or currently would last) ten seconds in that type of environment, where they can't just read off a teleprompter or take non-threatening questions from the careerists of the White House Press Corps. Where you actually have to KNOW in some detail policy issues and actually know your shit beyond campaign platitudes, otherwise you're going to be eviscerated by the inquiries.

  11. #51
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    That's perhaps the oddest thing about Trump, to me, in that he personally hasn't given near the amount of press conferences I thought he would have, being that he loves the sound of his own voice. Although maybe after the last round of them last week, perhaps it's better if he didn't...

  12. #52
    ROTH ARMY FOUNDER
    Old Fuckin' School
    Va Beach VH Fan's Avatar
    Member No
    12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Last Online
    01-28-2024 @ 09:22 AM
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    17,913
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    206
    Thanked 5,517 Times in 2,422 Posts


    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    That's perhaps the oddest thing about Trump, to me, in that he personally hasn't given near the amount of press conferences I thought he would have, being that he loves the sound of his own voice. Although maybe after the last round of them last week, perhaps it's better if he didn't...

    He's too ignorant about the issues to do press conferences with any regularity....

    He can't give even a high level answer about Afghanistan, or Syria, or health care, or tax reform, or much anything else....

    Plus the fact that the last couple of times he's taken questions, it's quickly turned into a circus, in which he's not good at defending himself....
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  13. Thanked Va Beach VH Fan for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (08-20-2017)


  14. #53
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    It was interesting listening to Penn Jillette who spent literally more than 100 hours with Trump speak about it again last week on his podcast, he hated Hilary, is a libertarian and wasn't a fan of GW either.

    He said that if you went into a shoe shop with GW Bush he would probably be the smartest guy in the room, Trump wouldn't.

    I kind of object to that analogy because I think I'm smarter than GW but his point was more that GW was only dumb by president standards, Trump is just kind of dumb in general.

    Maybe a better way of thinking about it is he is that 70 year old uncle who gets all his info from Fox TV and thinks he knows everything. Corners you at family gatherings and is sometimes kind of funny right up until the point he says something about n*****s.
    Last edited by Seshmeister; 08-20-2017 at 08:11 PM.

  15. Thanked Seshmeister for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (08-20-2017)


  16. #54
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    It was interesting listening to Penn Jillette who spent literally more than 100 hours with Trump speak about it again last week on his podcast, hates Hilary is a libertarian and wasn't a fan if GW either.

    He said that if you went into a shoe shop with GW Bush he would probably be the smartest guy in the room, Trump wouldn't.

    I kind of object to that analogy because I think I'm smarter than GW but his point was more that GW was only dumb by president standards, Trump is just kind of dumb in general.

    Maybe a better way of thinking about it is he is that 70 year old uncle who gets all his info from Fox TV and thinks he knows everything. Corners you at family gatherings and is sometimes kind of funny right up until the point he says something about n*****s.
    I never bought into the notion that W Bush was a dumbass.

    Intentionally simplistic, mildy dyslexic and willfully ignorant? Yes. Not what I would call stupid, though.

    Trump I think just views everything through the Darwinist prism he was taught to believe in.

    I'm sure Trump really thinks America's greatest days were the two decades following World War II, when America basically ruled the world, and America was ruled by white men (and women and minorities largely knew 'their place'). When things like climate change, economic inequality and social justice were either non-factors or easily relegated to the margins of the national conversation. I'm equally sure Trump thinks he can somehow roll back the clock to that period.

    The problem is that Trump hasn't realized those conditions immediately following World War II no longer exist and aren't going to be replicated. America isn't the country it was back then, and the world isn't what it was back then, either. His hardcore followers/voters haven't realized this, either.

    You combine all of this with Trump's other longstanding belief that facades, images and appearances can forever cloak realities, you've got a man who is unsuited to lead this country in these times. I also think he has a lack of ability to focus and a lack of ability to think about detailed solutions to complex problems beyond how those problems and solutions directly (and solely) affect him.

    Those characteristics matter far beyond his personal demeanor, his boorishness, lack of class and general assholishness. These things are just symptoms which manifest themselves as the result of deeper intellectual and emotional flaws.

    I mean, does it really matter if Mike Pence's character traits are more tolerable than those of Trumps if Pence reaches the same conclusions about various political/social/economic/environmental issues that Trump has? Like, all of that is acceptable because Mike Pence is a loudly self-proclaimed Christian who wouldn't dream of grabbing a woman other than his wife by the pussy (and even with his wife strictly for the purposes of procreation within the sanctity of heterosexual, church-recognized marriage)?

  17. #55
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    Homosexuality actually plays a big component in Nazism. Some times repressed, sometimes celebrated as some Spartan throwback of child rape and prison prostitution...

    Meet Ernst Rohm:



    https://daily.jstor.org/ernst-rohm-t...king-gay-nazi/
    I never thought about this before but what you are implying is Sammy Hagar is a Nazi.

  18. #56
    ROTH ARMY FOUNDER
    Old Fuckin' School
    Va Beach VH Fan's Avatar
    Member No
    12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Last Online
    01-28-2024 @ 09:22 AM
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    17,913
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    206
    Thanked 5,517 Times in 2,422 Posts


    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    I never bought into the notion that W Bush was a dumbass.

    Intentionally simplistic, mildy dyslexic and willfully ignorant? Yes. Not what I would call stupid, though.

    I would agree with that. I think simplistic really nails it.

    In fact, in reference to what he will go to his grave with the first line of his obituary, the war in Iraq, and the genned-up bullshit "evidence" that came leading up to it, came as a result of Saddam's attempted assassination of Daddy Bush in 1993. 9/11 simply gave him the opportunity to pull it off.

  19. #57
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Va Beach VH Fan View Post
    I would agree with that. I think simplistic really nails it.

    In fact, in reference to what he will go to his grave with the first line of his obituary, the war in Iraq, and the genned-up bullshit "evidence" that came leading up to it, came as a result of Saddam's attempted assassination of Daddy Bush in 1993. 9/11 simply gave him the opportunity to pull it off.
    Wolfowitz, Feith, Bolton and the rest of the neo-con lot - under the auspices of Cheney - that came back into government after the Supreme Court appointment of W to the presidency in December of 2000...none of those guys in 1991 thought HW Bush's response re: Iraq was adequate. Those guys all believed that the US should have toppled Hussein in the first Gulf War. They all also believed that a US-occupied/controlled Iraq represented what could be a foothold for US strategic interests in the region.

    I mean, they were - I think - true believers about this stuff. There wasn't much cynicism in their circles about this. They bought into their own hype that it would be fairly easy, wouldn't require a lot of boots on the ground because the superior US air power and missile capabilities would bring Iraq to heel with relative ease, that reconciling the multiple ethnic factions within Iraq wouldn't be problematic...the neo-cons were blinded by their own sense of intellect and hubris over what they thought was the righteousness of the US cause with regard to Iraq.

    All of that momentum was being ramped up from January of 2001 up until September 11th of the same year by those guys. W went along with all of it, and frankly so did the American media. The intelligence about Iraq's weapons capacity, capabilities and intent was cooked in the sense that the threats were cherry-picked and grossly exaggerated by Cheney and his gang. The immediate aftermath of 9/11 made all of this easy to swallow by the bulk of the American public.

    All of these neo-cons weren't really ready to fight an asymmetrical war with terrorists, which is certainly what the 9/11 attacks were. They were more comfortable with the notion of fighting a conventional war with a nation state. Because fighting something porous or amorphous like a terrorist organization that isn't tethered to a specific region is much more difficult: how can you ever be sure you've eradicated all the terrorist cells, or that for every one terrorist you're killing you're not breeding two more? Plus, if you're going to fight a quiet war using subtle means, it requires not boasting about success and being prepared to fight that fight for an indefinite period of time.

    It's distressing that Trump is now willing to go down into the Afghanistan rabbit hole, but in a way he has no choice. Not to do so would leave him open to claims of being insufficient in terms of combating terrorists, but the idea of there being a quantifiable goal that can actually be eventually reached...I don't see it. The Gulf War Part 2 was an instance of trying to create a war with such a goal. The result hasn't been a stabilization of Iraq, nor has it been an eradication of terrorism.

    Unfortunately, the only lesson America has learned from its mistakes is how to repeat them perfectly again and again.

  20. #58
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Va Beach VH Fan View Post
    I would agree with that. I think simplistic really nails it.

    In fact, in reference to what he will go to his grave with the first line of his obituary, the war in Iraq, and the genned-up bullshit "evidence" that came leading up to it, came as a result of Saddam's attempted assassination of Daddy Bush in 1993. 9/11 simply gave him the opportunity to pull it off.
    Someone asked him what he thought his legacy would be and he answered 'who cares we'll be dead'.

  21. Thanked Seshmeister for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (08-28-2017)


  22. #59
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    Wolfowitz, Feith, Bolton and the rest of the neo-con lot - under the auspices of Cheney - that came back into government after the Supreme Court appointment of W to the presidency in December of 2000...none of those guys in 1991 thought HW Bush's response re: Iraq was adequate. Those guys all believed that the US should have toppled Hussein in the first Gulf War. They all also believed that a US-occupied/controlled Iraq represented what could be a foothold for US strategic interests in the region.

    I mean, they were - I think - true believers about this stuff. There wasn't much cynicism in their circles about this. They bought into their own hype that it would be fairly easy, wouldn't require a lot of boots on the ground because the superior US air power and missile capabilities would bring Iraq to heel with relative ease, that reconciling the multiple ethnic factions within Iraq wouldn't be problematic...the neo-cons were blinded by their own sense of intellect and hubris over what they thought was the righteousness of the US cause with regard to Iraq.

    All of that momentum was being ramped up from January of 2001 up until September 11th of the same year by those guys. W went along with all of it, and frankly so did the American media. The intelligence about Iraq's weapons capacity, capabilities and intent was cooked in the sense that the threats were cherry-picked and grossly exaggerated by Cheney and his gang. The immediate aftermath of 9/11 made all of this easy to swallow by the bulk of the American public.

    All of these neo-cons weren't really ready to fight an asymmetrical war with terrorists, which is certainly what the 9/11 attacks were. They were more comfortable with the notion of fighting a conventional war with a nation state. Because fighting something porous or amorphous like a terrorist organization that isn't tethered to a specific region is much more difficult: how can you ever be sure you've eradicated all the terrorist cells, or that for every one terrorist you're killing you're not breeding two more? Plus, if you're going to fight a quiet war using subtle means, it requires not boasting about success and being prepared to fight that fight for an indefinite period of time.

    It's distressing that Trump is now willing to go down into the Afghanistan rabbit hole, but in a way he has no choice. Not to do so would leave him open to claims of being insufficient in terms of combating terrorists, but the idea of there being a quantifiable goal that can actually be eventually reached...I don't see it. The Gulf War Part 2 was an instance of trying to create a war with such a goal. The result hasn't been a stabilization of Iraq, nor has it been an eradication of terrorism.

    Unfortunately, the only lesson America has learned from its mistakes is how to repeat them perfectly again and again.
    Trump deploying more troops to Afghanistan is breaking his promise to get us out of unnecessary deployments. Everyone knows we don't need to be over there and it's gone on for 18 years. You are spot on about the neocons. This is all about making money. Eisenhower warned this kind of stuff would happen.

  23. Thanked Nitro Express for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (08-28-2017)


  24. #60
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    Trump deploying more troops to Afghanistan is breaking his promise to get us out of unnecessary deployments. Everyone knows we don't need to be over there and it's gone on for 18 years. You are spot on about the neocons. This is all about making money. Eisenhower warned this kind of stuff would happen.
    Trump's inclination - one of the few things he was consistent about in his comments for the last decade or so - was that Afghanistan and Iraq were mistakes. Not just in terms of the mechanics of how those conflicts were pursued, but the total rationale for going in. Same with Libya, Syria, etc.

    Thus, his recent speech was...whatever the value of the reportage that Trump was disinclined to re-engage in Afghanistan prior to meeting with the generals, if that was truthful or not or just a planted story to provide cover for Trump in terms of allocating possible future blame ("I didn't want to put more troops in, but the generals said they could win...Generals are Bad!")...it was just disheartening to see him decide to re-up the ante in Afghanistan in terms of conventional forces and speak the teleprompter text that he expected to "win" in Afghanistan.

    As far as Eisenhower and the military-industrial complex, you have roughly 25% of GDP funding the military: it's only natural to follow that you're going to have to utilize the military in some fashion to justify the perpetuation of conventional weapons manufacturing and maintaining armed forces personnel. Otherwise, why spend so much money? Eisenhower was also pretty spot-on about missile defense systems, in that once you have reached the capability of essentially destroying the entire planet, any missiles built beyond that point are just a waste: once you have a sufficient deterrent, producing arms beyond that doesn't make the deterrent any stronger. Now, we are looking at spending a trillion dollars to overhaul, modernize and upgrade our nuclear capability. All for weapons that nobody short of the insane wants to see used...ever. It's crazy on the face of it and crazy through and through, despite what the usual cast of Pentagon-advocating talking heads will say in terms of the necessity of it (as they have been for 50 years now).

  25. #61
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    Someone asked him what he thought his legacy would be and he answered 'who cares we'll be dead'.
    When I said 'Someone' I should have looked it up in these days of 'fake news', I got the quote a bit wrong too.

    George W. Bush, when asked by Bob Woodward "how is history likely to judge your Iraq war?" replied, "History, we don't know. We'll all be dead." (Woodward Shares War Secrets, CBS News, 60 Minutes, April 18, 2004).
    There seem to be various thesis around on how this showed that Bush expects the apocalypse and is a big Revelations follower like our own FORD.

    To me it's more likely he was just shrugging.
    Last edited by Seshmeister; 08-28-2017 at 09:42 AM.

  26. #62
    Sheep Pen noob
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    vandeleur's Avatar
    Member No
    24919
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    10-02-2021 @ 02:52 AM
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    9,870
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,960
    Thanked 2,941 Times in 2,103 Posts


    Rep Power
    54
    Ford has left the building ... choked on his home brew carrot and fig lager
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  27. #63
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,067
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 3,449 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    Trump deploying more troops to Afghanistan is breaking his promise to get us out of unnecessary deployments...
    Which promise hasn't he broken?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  28. #64
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by vandeleur View Post
    Ford has left the building ... choked on his home brew carrot and fig lager
    Run out of town by DONNIEP and his crew?


  29. 2 users say thank you to Seshmeister for this KICKASS post:

    DONNIEP (08-29-2017),vandeleur (08-29-2017)


  30. #65
    Sheep Pen noob
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    vandeleur's Avatar
    Member No
    24919
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    10-02-2021 @ 02:52 AM
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    9,870
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,960
    Thanked 2,941 Times in 2,103 Posts


    Rep Power
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    Run out of town by DONNIEP and his crew?

    Haha can I guess which one is Donnie

  31. Thanked vandeleur for this KICKASS post:

    DONNIEP (08-29-2017)


  32. #66
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Von Halen's Avatar
    Member No
    15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:56 PM
    Location
    Washington Twp., MI
    Age
    60
    Posts
    7,574
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    2,141
    Thanked 3,508 Times in 1,989 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by vandeleur View Post
    Haha can I guess which one is Donnie
    The one to the right of NickDickless?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  33. Thanked Von Halen for this KICKASS post:

    DONNIEP (08-29-2017)


  34. #67
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    Which promise hasn't he broken?
    The border is more secure than it was. He really can't do anything with healthcare unless the Republican Party wants to work with him. A lot of Trump not being able to fulfill promises is the Republicans in the congress are breaking their campaign promises. As far as deploying more troops to Afghanistan goes Trump owns that mistake. As Terry has said he was against more troop deployments before he even ran for president and he campaigned on getting us out of unnecessary conflicts.

  35. #68
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    Trump's inclination - one of the few things he was consistent about in his comments for the last decade or so - was that Afghanistan and Iraq were mistakes. Not just in terms of the mechanics of how those conflicts were pursued, but the total rationale for going in. Same with Libya, Syria, etc.

    Thus, his recent speech was...whatever the value of the reportage that Trump was disinclined to re-engage in Afghanistan prior to meeting with the generals, if that was truthful or not or just a planted story to provide cover for Trump in terms of allocating possible future blame ("I didn't want to put more troops in, but the generals said they could win...Generals are Bad!")...it was just disheartening to see him decide to re-up the ante in Afghanistan in terms of conventional forces and speak the teleprompter text that he expected to "win" in Afghanistan.

    As far as Eisenhower and the military-industrial complex, you have roughly 25% of GDP funding the military: it's only natural to follow that you're going to have to utilize the military in some fashion to justify the perpetuation of conventional weapons manufacturing and maintaining armed forces personnel. Otherwise, why spend so much money? Eisenhower was also pretty spot-on about missile defense systems, in that once you have reached the capability of essentially destroying the entire planet, any missiles built beyond that point are just a waste: once you have a sufficient deterrent, producing arms beyond that doesn't make the deterrent any stronger. Now, we are looking at spending a trillion dollars to overhaul, modernize and upgrade our nuclear capability. All for weapons that nobody short of the insane wants to see used...ever. It's crazy on the face of it and crazy through and through, despite what the usual cast of Pentagon-advocating talking heads will say in terms of the necessity of it (as they have been for 50 years now).
    The problem with Afghanistan is we have no clear objective there. It's a failed state with no real functioning government. We have been there with our thumb up our ass for 18 years. I wish I was making money off it.

  36. #69
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    The border is more secure than it was. He really can't do anything with healthcare unless the Republican Party wants to work with him. A lot of Trump not being able to fulfill promises is the Republicans in the congress are breaking their campaign promises. As far as deploying more troops to Afghanistan goes Trump owns that mistake. As Terry has said he was against more troop deployments before he even ran for president and he campaigned on getting us out of unnecessary conflicts.
    A lot of Trump not being able to fulfill promises is that Trump isn't going to be able to provide "wonderful health care - better than we've ever seen - for everybody" via Executive Order. Plus, much like Trumps "tax plan" Trump's "healthcare plan" (or the Repeal and Replace Ryan plan) isn't one his voters wanted once they got beyond the campaign rhetoric and discovered both plans amount to giving massive tax breaks to the top 10% and everybody else the middle finger.

    Infrastructure is something Trump might actually be able to do something with, but the idea of massively defunding various federal governmental agencies in an attempt to get them to collapse via neglect, giving perfunctory block grants to individual states to do with as they please (in terms of funding health insurance, individual state infrastructure, etc.) and calling that a "national health insurance plan" or a "national infrastructure plan" isn't going to pass muster. Even Trump's most hardcore supporters are going to expect something tangible from him at some point, and him merely pointing his finger at Congress (or Obama, or Hillary, or immigrants, or Islamic terrorists, or the 'fake news media') and blaming them for [Trump's] failures...I mean, maybe that will work long enough to get him a 2nd term...

  37. #70
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,067
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 3,449 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by vandeleur View Post
    Haha can I guess which one is Donnie
    He's the one next to VonHagar;;;

  38. 2 users say thank you to Nickdfresh for this KICKASS post:

    Nitro Express (08-29-2017),Von Halen (08-29-2017)


  39. #71
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    The problem with Afghanistan is we have no clear objective there. It's a failed state with no real functioning government. We have been there with our thumb up our ass for 18 years. I wish I was making money off it.
    In addition, every Afghani faction knows that America won't be there forever. Even if we put 100,000 more troops in there, in the short term we might be able to - at best - temporarily secure the political and religious infighting. Long run, it'll just go back to shit when we eventually declare 'victory' and pull the bulk of our troops out. The nation has had no real economy outside of opium for decades, and the chances of America bringing anything resembling US democracy there that would actually take root and hold in terms of the long run...nothing short of invading the entire country, completely taking it over and remaining there forever is going to make that happen.

    4,000 more troops (or whatever number the generals have convinced Trump will get the 'job' done) is a mere band aid on a mortal wound.

  40. #72
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    A lot of Trump not being able to fulfill promises is that Trump isn't going to be able to provide "wonderful health care - better than we've ever seen - for everybody" via Executive Order. Plus, much like Trumps "tax plan" Trump's "healthcare plan" (or the Repeal and Replace Ryan plan) isn't one his voters wanted once they got beyond the campaign rhetoric and discovered both plans amount to giving massive tax breaks to the top 10% and everybody else the middle finger

    Infrastructure is something Trump might actually be able to do something with, but the idea of massively defunding various federal governmental agencies in an attempt to get them to collapse via neglect, giving perfunctory block grants to individual states to do with as they please (in terms of funding health insurance, individual state infrastructure, etc.) and calling that a "national health insurance plan" or a "national infrastructure plan" isn't going to pass muster. Even Trump's most hardcore supporters are going to expect something tangible from him at some point, and him merely pointing his finger at Congress (or Obama, or Hillary, or immigrants, or Islamic terrorists, or the 'fake news media') and blaming them for [Trump's] failures...I mean, maybe that will work long enough to get him a 2nd term...
    There is so much infighting and back stabbing now we are politically fucked. Everyone is just out for themselves to the point we are killing the golden goose. We are headed for a collapse.

  41. Thanked Nitro Express for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (08-29-2017)


  42. #73
    Lick me
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    Terry's Avatar
    Member No
    181
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:58 PM
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    11,904
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 2,267 Times in 1,488 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    There is so much infighting and back stabbing now we are politically fucked. Everyone is just out for themselves to the point we are killing the golden goose. We are headed for a collapse.
    We have a massively banked elite who have spent the last 40 years paying off elected officials of both parties to allow American businesses to relocate manufacturing jobs overseas with virtually nothing in the way of meaningful penalties in terms of tariffs or taxes to dissuade these corporations from doing so. We've got a financial sector that is free to do virtually whatever they want in an essentially consequence-free environment in terms of whatever fines DO end up being attached to these companies for breaking the law are much, much smaller than the profits to be made for doing so. We have a prison system that has become more and more privatized, which only incentivizes putting more and more people (usually the poor) in the prisons. We have local police forces who have become virtually militarized in terms of the hardware and policing tactics they utilize to keep the underclasses in line. A majority of our citizenry would find it difficult to come up with $1,000 in cash at any given time in the event of an emergency. Everybody is floating on credit. Our population is rapidly aging in terms of the median population age (and overall we're getting fatter as a society): the elderly are living longer on the whole, but now people are beginning to outlive their retirement savings. Wages have flat lined for the working class for decades. 90% of us working at Walmart/Starbucks while the other 10% swap and trade bad loans and packaged debt doesn't seem to be viable. And all of the above is just a start!! You and I and everyone else on this site could keep adding to this list for pages and pages.

    Yeah, it feels like we're on the verge of something that's not going to be pleasant, to say the least. It's hard to imagine this way of life being sustained in the manner that it currently is for much longer: at some point, it's probably gonna snap.

  43. #74
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Seshmeister View Post
    The "because it's her turn" slogan may be one of the worst ideas in electoral history.

    The Nitro statement about people voting for Trump because 'it couldn't get any worse than it already was' is exactly correct and the same reason that Brexit too happened, both on very narrow majorities but anyhoo.

    That people could think that things couldn't get any worse is astonishing. Things can always get much much worse. I wonder if it's a lack of knowledge of history but then in both the Trump vote and Brexit it was the old people that voted for it. Here's a thought after another atrocity in Spain yesterday, terrorist murders in Europe are a small fraction now than they were in the 1970s. Public disorder, killings in the US, again a small fraction of what they were.

    Bullshit however is up big time.
    You also have to add in that the Democratic Party stole Bernie Sander's nomination and gave it to Hillary. That pissed people off.

  44. #75
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Bernie was popular. I don't know if Trump could have beat Bernie fever.

  45. #76
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:53 AM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,703
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked 3,991 Times in 3,230 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    We have a massively banked elite who have spent the last 40 years paying off elected officials of both parties to allow American businesses to relocate manufacturing jobs overseas with virtually nothing in the way of meaningful penalties in terms of tariffs or taxes to dissuade these corporations from doing so. We've got a financial sector that is free to do virtually whatever they want in an essentially consequence-free environment in terms of whatever fines DO end up being attached to these companies for breaking the law are much, much smaller than the profits to be made for doing so. We have a prison system that has become more and more privatized, which only incentivizes putting more and more people (usually the poor) in the prisons. We have local police forces who have become virtually militarized in terms of the hardware and policing tactics they utilize to keep the underclasses in line. A majority of our citizenry would find it difficult to come up with $1,000 in cash at any given time in the event of an emergency. Everybody is floating on credit. Our population is rapidly aging in terms of the median population age (and overall we're getting fatter as a society): the elderly are living longer on the whole, but now people are beginning to outlive their retirement savings. Wages have flat lined for the working class for decades. 90% of us working at Walmart/Starbucks while the other 10% swap and trade bad loans and packaged debt doesn't seem to be viable. And all of the above is just a start!! You and I and everyone else on this site could keep adding to this list for pages and pages.

    Yeah, it feels like we're on the verge of something that's not going to be pleasant, to say the least. It's hard to imagine this way of life being sustained in the manner that it currently is for much longer: at some point, it's probably gonna snap.
    She's gonna blow captain she can't take no more!

  46. Thanked Nitro Express for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (09-02-2017)


  47. #77
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    Bernie was popular. I don't know if Trump could have beat Bernie fever.
    Apparently 10-15% of Bernie voters switched to Trump.

  48. #78
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,067
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 3,449 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    You also have to add in that the Democratic Party stole Bernie Sander's nomination and gave it to Hillary. That pissed people off.
    They didn't "steal" it, Hillary always had the delegates. And I wanted Bernie...

  49. Thanked Nickdfresh for this KICKASS post:

    Terry (09-02-2017)


  50. #79
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,067
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 3,449 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitro Express View Post
    Bernie was popular. I don't know if Trump could have beat Bernie fever.

    Bernie would have gotten much of Trump's voting demographic and would have generated more of the youth vote...

  51. #80
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Seshmeister's Avatar
    Member No
    11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    35,078
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 9,347 Times in 6,031 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    They didn't "steal" it, Hillary always had the delegates. And I wanted Bernie...
    Where's FORD?

    In his absence have you seen this?

    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-ad...ainst-sanders/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Woman In Love (NOT Women In Love)
    By WARF in forum VH/DLR Songs And Albums
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2015, 04:48 PM
  2. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 03-12-2012, 09:23 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-24-2006, 06:34 PM
  4. "Party Trumps Race"
    By Big Train in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-03-2005, 11:21 PM
  5. For Love
    By frenchie in forum Max's Non VH/DLR Related Stuff
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-15-2004, 08:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •