Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: How To Fix The Democratic Party

  1. #1
    Cascadian Secession NOW!!
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:32 AM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    51,817
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,085
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,197 Posts


    Rep Power
    123

    How To Fix The Democratic Party

    politico.com
    How to Fix the Democratic Party
    By SEN. BERNIE SANDERS






    Donald Trump’s presidency represents an unprecedented crisis for our country. His campaign, and now his White House, seek to divide us using racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia and xenophobia. His economic agenda is the agenda of the billionaire class. He wants more tax breaks for the rich, while cutting education, nutrition, affordable housing and other programs desperately needed by working families. And his refusal to acknowledge the great danger of climate change is a threat to the entire planet.

    There is nothing, nothing more important than defeating Donald Trump and his extreme right-wing agenda. But this will not happen without an effective opposition party.

    Victories in Virginia, New Jersey, Washington, Maine and other states around the country on Tuesday are an important first step in pushing back against Trump’s radical agenda. It was especially gratifying to see thousands of working people and young people jump into the political process, volunteering, knocking on doors and winning elections to state legislatures, city councils and school boards. But the longer-term trend for the Democratic Party is worrisome.

    Since 2009, it has lost more than 1,000 seats in state legislatures across the country. Republicans now control the White House and 34 (soon to be 33) out of 50 governorships, as well as the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.

    In 26 states, Republicans control the governor's mansion along with the entirety of the state legislature. This is not just in so-called deep red states. It is true in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Florida and New Hampshire, all of which will be critical to defeating Trump in 2020, and in drawing congressional districts following that year’s Census.

    What is especially absurd about this situation is that the American people strongly oppose almost all elements of the Trump-Republican agenda. Fewer than one-third of Americans support the Trump and Republican tax cuts for the wealthy, and just 12 percent supported their plan to throw tens of millions of people off of their health care. The majority of Americans understand that climate change is real.

    Donna Brazile’s recent book makes it abundantly clear how important it is to bring fundamental reforms to the Democratic Party. The party cannot remain an institution largely dominated by the wealthy and inside-the-Beltway consultants. It must open its doors and welcome into its ranks millions of working people and young people who desperately want to be involved in determining the future of our nation.

    Last year, Secretary Hillary Clinton and I agreed upon the need for a Unity Reform Commission to move the party in a new and more democratic direction. In a few weeks, this group will have its final meeting in Washington, D.C., and will decide if we are going to move forward in an inclusive way or continue with the current failed approach.

    This is not some abstract, insular debate. The future of Democratic Party institutions has everything to do with whether or not Democrats have the grass-roots energy to effectively take on Trump, the Republican Party and their reactionary agenda—or whether we remain in the minority.

    What are some of the reforms that are desperately needed?

    First, it is absurd that the Democratic Party now gives over 700 superdelegates—almost one-third the number a presidential candidate needs to win the nomination—the power to control the nominating process and ignore the will of voters.

    Second, in contrast to Republicans, Democrats believe in making voting easier, not harder. We believe in universal and same-day voter registration and ending antiquated, arbitrary and discriminatory voter registration laws. These same principles must apply to our primaries. Our job must be to reach out to independents and to young people and bring them into the Democratic Party process. Independent voters are critical to general election victories. Locking them out of primaries is a pathway to failure.

    In that regard, it is absurd that New Yorkers must change their party registration six months before the Democratic primary in order to participate. Other states have similar, if not as onerous provisions.

    Third, in states that use caucuses, we must make it easier for working people and students to participate. While there is much to be said for bringing people together, face to face to discuss why they support the candidate of their choice, not everybody is able to participate because of work, child care or other obligations. A process must be developed that gives everyone the right to cast a vote even if they are not physically able to attend a caucus.

    Finally, if we are to succeed, we must fully appreciate Brazile’s revelations and understand the need for far more transparency in the financial and policy workings of the Democratic Party. Hundreds of millions of dollars flow in and out of the Democratic National Committee with little to no accountability. That simply is not acceptable.

    At a time when we have a Republican president and Republican Party whose leadership and agenda are strongly opposed by the American people, now is the time for real change. It is critical that we come together and reform the Democratic Party. When we do that, we will win local, state and national elections and transform our country.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    Von Halen's Avatar
    Member No
    15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:20 PM
    Location
    Chesterfield Twp., MI
    Age
    54
    Posts
    6,702
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,481
    Thanked 3,005 Times in 1,697 Posts


    Rep Power
    10
    A guy that will soon be suffering from Dementia, leading the delusional. Perfect!
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  3. #3
    Cascadian Secession NOW!!
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:32 AM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    51,817
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,085
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,197 Posts


    Rep Power
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by Von Halen View Post
    A guy that will soon be suffering from Dementia, leading the delusional. Perfect!
    Leave Herr Cheeto out of this....


  4. #4
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    11-18-2017 @ 10:25 PM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    28,271
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,116
    Thanked 3,130 Times in 2,545 Posts


    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    75
    What would help the Democrat Party is getting some leadership who doesn't steal from the party. The party was $2 million in debt when Donna Brazile got the job of running it. This was due to Obama taking money from the party and Debbie Wasserman Schultz allowing all sorts of unneeded employs to keep their jobs when they were not needed. In short the Democrats leached their own party into debt. First get someone in there to lead the party who understands budgeting. That would be a first good step. Also blaming the competition and cooking up false stories to explain your own problems isn't going to work. It's called alienating your base voters and incompetence. Hillary and Bernie both proved they were for sale. If Bernie can't even stand up against corruption in his own party that were undermining him how is he going to be a good president? Until the Democrats can prove they really are a competent party that can actually run things for the better they will continue to shrink into a regional party. Blaming others and not cleaning house isn't going to solve the problem.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. Thanked Nitro Express for this KICKASS post:

    Von Halen (11-11-2017)


  6. #5
    Cascadian Secession NOW!!
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:32 AM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    51,817
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,085
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,197 Posts


    Rep Power
    123

    Go Left, Dems: 7 Ways "Democrats" Are Misreading the November 7 Results

    Go Left, Dems: 7 Ways Democrats Are Misreading the November 7 Results
    By Richard Eskow / AlterNet


    If you're a Democrat, there's a name for that unfamiliar emotion you were feeling last Tuesday night. It's called happiness. But there is a serious risk that the party will draw the wrong lessons from last week's results.

    Here are seven important lessons from the November 7 results that a lot of Democrats seem to have missed.

    1. It's too easy to fall for spin, or for easily digestible but misleading narratives.

    What do a former Republican doctor, a Goldman Sachs executive turned Bernie-style economic populist, a transgender heavy metal singer, and a Virginia socialist have in common? They all won as Democrats.

    You'd think a diverse group like this would make it hard to pigeonhole the election's results. That didn't stop some people from trying. On election night, Jennifer Psaki, former communications director for the Obama White House, told CNN viewers that Ralph Northam's victory in the Virginia gubernatorial race proved that Democrats must reject any "litmus tests" from the party's progressive wing. To Psaki, Northam's seemingly moderate posture proved that Democrats must run conservative candidates in some portions of the country. (While his bio is "centrist," Northam took progressive positions on several issues, most notably education.)

    And yet, when "centrist" Jon Ossoff lost in Georgia's Sixth Congressional District (despite a massive infusion of outside money, Ossoff failed even to match Hillary Clinton's numbers in his suburban district), Psaki reassured Democrats that there was no need to worry. Ossoff was helping to define a winning strategy, she wrote, even in defeat. Our own analysis of that race showed that Ossoff could have closed the gap and won the election if he had appealed more directly to some of the people who have been hit hardest by ongoing weakness in the economy: African Americans, Hispanics and young people.

    Writing in the Columbia Journalism Review, Jon Allsop injects an appropriate note of caution into coverage of last week's. As satisfying as it is for some Democrats to read about a "forceful rebuke" or "stinging repudiation" of the president they despise, that's overly simplistic. The dynamics of voter turnout in an off-year vote like this one differ significantly from congressional and (especially) presidential elections.

    2. Hatred of Trump won’t save the Democrats.

    Last week's victories offer only a temporary distraction from the Democratic Party's ongoing troubles. Voter approval of the party is at a 25-year low, down to 37 percent from March of this year. Perhaps even more significantly, approval is down markedly among nonwhites and young voters, two groups the party needs for long-term success.

    The fact that Republicans are even more unpopular should offer little comfort, since these numbers point to increasingly low turnout. That will benefit the GOP, which has gerrymandered itself into near-perpetual incumbency over much of the country.

    The media always need a narrative, and this time around it chose "Trump repudiation." But it would be a mistake for Democrats to build their 2018 or 2020 campaigns solely around Trump's manifold flaws. They did that in 2016, and it didn't work out too well.

    If there was an overarching message to last week's results, it may well have been that nontraditional candidates—including ex-Republican physician Northam, first-time political candidate Murphy and the newly elected Virginia delegates—were more attractive to voters than "career politicians."

    3. A Berniecrat would also have won in Virginia.

    Psaki asserted that Northam's progressive primary challenger, Tom Perriello, would have lost the gubernatorial race. That's contradicted by both pre-election modeling and an analysis of exit polls. As political scientist John Sides wrote, "Northam beat expectations, but not the fundamentals."

    Here's what he means: As Nate Silver explains, gubernatorial races can defy expectations. (I'd surmise that these races are often driven by personality, rather than party or policy.) But before the election, Silver modeled the Virginia race, using the political climate and the state itself as predictors, and said that these "fundamentals" showed a 9 percent victory margin in Virginia for the Democrat—any Democrat.

    Northam won by 8.6 percent. That undermines the assertion that Perriello would have performed more poorly. So do upset victories for a number of decidedly non-traditional and left Democrats (including one self-described Manassas socialist) who won further down the ticket, both in Virginia and around the country.

    Health was, by far, the issue of greatest concern for Virginia voters. Republican attempts to undermine the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, and Medicaid almost certainly helped Northam. Anti-Trumpism was also a factor. But opposition to Trump is not unique to "centrists," and Perriello might have been a stronger standard-bearer for the #Resistance than Northam, who sent decidedly mixed messages about the 45th president. (Trump was a "narcissistic maniac," said Northam, but he'd work with him if he were "helping Virginia.")

    4. New Jersey was a progressive win.

    Know who didn't underperform, even slightly, against "fundamentals"? Phil Murphy, the Democratic candidate who edged out Republican Kim Guadagno in the New Jersey governor's race. Silver's model showed the generic Democrat with a 13-percent margin, and Murphy beat Guadagno by 13.3 points.

    Murphy was clearly helped by hostility toward Chris Christie, the highly popular outgoing governor. CBS News polling showed that 51 percent of voters thought less of Guadagno because of her association with Christie (she was Christie's lieutenant governor), while 42 percent said it didn't matter. Only 4 percent thought better of her because of it.

    Murphy's Goldman Sachs career presented a hurdle, too, but it was not as steep. According to the same poll, 29 percent of voters thought less of him as a result, but 59 percent said they didn't care.

    Despite his Wall Street background, there was no way to mistake Murphy for a centrist. His economic plan included a $15-an-hour minimum wage, guaranteed sick leave, closing the gender pay gap, and higher taxes for millionaires and corporations. He proposed a state bank to promote the public good, an excellent idea with strong support from the left. He rejected the idea of cutting pensions for New Jersey employees, saying, "The state has to stand up for its side of the bargain. Period."

    Murphy proposed a state-run retirement plan for employees of small businesses. And he embraced another left idea to reduce gender and other pay inequities by proposing that employers be banned from asking applicants about their salary history.

    And yet, we haven't heard very many mainstream politicians or pundits point to Murphy's victory as a sign that Democrats need to move further left on economic issues. Maybe they should, although all signs already pointed to a Democratic victory here, as in Virginia.

    5. The left won big in other races, too.

    Lee Carter, a self-described democratic socialist, scored an upset victory over one of the most powerful Republicans in Virginia's House of Delegates. Carter received campaign help from the Democratic Socialists of America, and celebrated his victory over House GOP whip Jackson Miller by singing "Solidarity Forever" with a roomful of supporters. Carter, who said he was exposed to democratic socialism by Bernie Sanders' campaign, will represent Manassas.

    "If you’re to the left of Barry Goldwater," Carter told the New Republic's Graham Vyse, "Republicans are going to call you a socialist anyway, so you may as well just own the label."

    Carter's win was one of several victories the left scored last week, as Miles Kampf-Lassin of In These Times notes. Larry Krasner, a leftist attorney who opposes mass incarceration and wants to abolish bail, prevailed in last spring's Democratic primary and became Philadelphia's district attorney on Tuesday. Left candidate Seema Singh Perez won a seat on the Knoxville, TN city council. All seven candidates backed by the Sanders-inspired group Our Revolution won seats on Somerville, MA's Board of Aldermen. Our Revolution also backed Maine's referendum expanding Medicaid coverage, which won by a large margin.

    Two winners in the Somerville election were backed by DSA, which also saw local wins across the country, with members prevailing in Ohio and Minnesota and candidates it supported winning in New York City, upstate New York, Montana, Pittsburgh, and elsewhere in Pennsylvania.

    "In total," writes the New Republic's Sarah Jones, "19 candidates backed by Our Revolution won seats; so did 15 members of Democratic Socialists of America." Adds Jones; 'There is no real divide separating progressive populism from identity politics. "


    6. The base is critical to victory—and it wants to move left.


    If anything, Jones is dramatically understating the case. "Identity" groups lean further left, and are more interested in replacing the Democratic Party's current leadership, than white males.

    A recent Harvard-Harris pollshows that each of these groups is more left-leaning than whites and males. Support for "movements ... to take (the party) even further to the left and oppose the current Democratic leaders" was 69 percent for voters aged 18-34. It was 65 percent among Hispanics and 55 percent among African Americans, and only 46 percent for whites. 55 percent of women and only 49 percent of men supported these movements.

    So much for the white, "Bernie Bro" canard against the left.

    The populist-leaning Murphy performed as well among white males (with 50 percent of their vote) as Northam did (with 51 percent) in Virginia. But it would be a mistake to pursue those voters at the expense of the Democratic base. Tuesday's election results confirm that the electorate is increasingly polarized. Victory depends more on turnout from young people, women, and people of color. It therefore becomes incumbent to create a party that appeals to these voters—and the Harvard-Harris poll tells us that what they want is a party of the left, with new leaders at the helm.

    7. The left has shown the struggling Democrats a way forward.

    Establishment Democrats have maintained for years that leftists can't get elected. Sure, they say, it would be nice to have real change in this country, but it's just not "pragmatic." That position is increasingly hard to defend. Bernie Sanders is the nation's most popular politician, while leftists have won victories from Montana to Maine.

    That should not be a surprise. Regardless of how they identify themselves on the conservative/liberal spectrum, many voters embrace left-leaning policies. Peter Dreier listed some of the results of recent polling for the American Prospect. Some examples: Large majorities believe that the wealthy, corporations, and Wall Street have too much political power. Voters want to reduce the influence of money in politics, address economic inequality, improve worker benefits, expand the federal government's role in health insurance, and make public colleges and universities tuition-free.

    How did these left candidates win? By combining an attractive policy agenda with on-the-ground organizing rooted in movement activism. That kind of campaign strategy can liberate the Democratic Party from its dependence on large infusions of campaign cash.

    As recent scandals and revelations have shown, the Democratic Party will continue to struggle as long as its dependence on large-donor cash conflicts with its ability to craft progressive policies and campaign around them. These progressive victories have shown the party the way forward.

    Richard (RJ) Eskow is a blogger and writer, a former Wall Street executive, a consultant, and a former musician.

  7. #6
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    11-18-2017 @ 10:25 PM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    28,271
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,116
    Thanked 3,130 Times in 2,545 Posts


    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    75
    The Democrat Party is split between two groups and it's losing one group and will continue to do so unless they drop the identity politics schtick. Identity politics is popular with the rich Democrats in the entertainment industry, the elites in the big cities, and with academics. Basically rich people who already have plenty of money and identity politics is the current fad. The traditional base of the Democrat Party is the working class. The people who have seen their job outsourced over the years and feel the Democrat Party has neglected them. Basically Donald Trump appealed to the lunch bucket voters more than the academic and aristocrat elites. The traditional Democrat voter felt alienated by the Democrats and gave Trump a shot. Moving farther left won't solve a thing. If the Democrats continue to focus on identity politics and not helping small business and the working class they will continue to lose. The Dems really have become the party of the trendy rich and not the average working American and this is why they lose. Winning in NYC and in northern Virginia means nothing. Since Washington DC has swelled and has been the largest employer formerly Republican northern Virginia is just another part of DC full of government workers who want to keep large government and their jobs. Of course the Dems are going to get votes there. The demographics have changed.

  8. #7
    Cascadian Secession NOW!!
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:32 AM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    51,817
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,085
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,197 Posts


    Rep Power
    123
    Winning in VA actually is a big deal. That's a state where Terry McUseless and Mark Warner get away with calling themselves "Democrats". Before this election, Virginia had about the same amount of actual Democrats in office as Florida, which was zero. I'm not as sold on Northam as RJ Eskow apparently is, but if he's even 10% better than Terry McUseless, that's progress.

    As for the working class, kitchen table issues, that's where Danica Roem (the tranny metalhead) comes in. She was talking about infrastructure, while her opponent - the self proclaimed "homophobe in chief" - only wanted to talk about plumbing... specifically the kind between her legs. Voters went with the issues that were actually important. They have to drive to work too, so they got what Roem was saying in her ads....



    If somebody is going to fix the roads so you can get home from work sooner, do you really care what's between their legs? Apparently the voters of that district chose the logical answer.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Democratic Party is DEAD
    By FORD in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 03-05-2017, 04:07 PM
  2. Fascism in the Democratic Party!
    By BigBadBrian in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-27-2005, 02:19 AM
  3. The Democratic Party is Toast
    By John Ashcroft in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-28-2004, 12:25 PM
  4. Five reasons to fear the Democratic party
    By BigBadBrian in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2004, 09:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •