I kinda think they probably never owned the rights. But on the other hand, they may have some control over things like commercial video/DVD releases.
I know a lot of footage of the other acts on the bill that day has cropped up, but I wonder if they had different contractual deals regarding footage and who owned what was filmed, than the headliners did? I don't think there has been official video/DVD of The Clash and Bowie - like VH, there are bits of The Clash on youtube, taken from the TV broadcast.
Around '84 I remember Ed saying they were contracted to deliver an edited version of the gig for TV broadcast, which is one thing that held up the recording of '1984', and it was something they never wanted to do - but they owed it to the Festival organisers. i.e., the impression being that this was part of the deal with the Unuson Corporation (who were the legal entity financing the festival), and that they probably had the rights to whatever was filmed that day. They were paying ludicrous sums of money, so it might have been part of the deal - "we give you $1.5m, and we get to show the gig on TV"??
Ed also said that the job of editing was done by "Alex and the lighting guy" (Pete Angelus, presumably) which, to me, makes it sound like they saw it as a throwaway concert vid that might, over time, just vanish!
I know a lot of footage of the other acts on the bill that day has cropped up, but I wonder if they had different contractual deals regarding footage and who owned what was filmed, than the headliners did? I don't think there has been official video/DVD of The Clash and Bowie - like VH, there are bits of The Clash on youtube, taken from the TV broadcast.
Around '84 I remember Ed saying they were contracted to deliver an edited version of the gig for TV broadcast, which is one thing that held up the recording of '1984', and it was something they never wanted to do - but they owed it to the Festival organisers. i.e., the impression being that this was part of the deal with the Unuson Corporation (who were the legal entity financing the festival), and that they probably had the rights to whatever was filmed that day. They were paying ludicrous sums of money, so it might have been part of the deal - "we give you $1.5m, and we get to show the gig on TV"??
Ed also said that the job of editing was done by "Alex and the lighting guy" (Pete Angelus, presumably) which, to me, makes it sound like they saw it as a throwaway concert vid that might, over time, just vanish!
Comment