No, we certainly don't live a country politically where one party is the "good guys" and one party is the "bad guys". We live in a country where there are 2 major political parties, and the net effect of this bipartisan rule - regardless of which party is in power, so there is PLENTY of blame to go around - has been a increasing stratification of wealth and a concentration of power that has taken several decades to get to where we are now, but here we are.
We can't really call the GOP a bunch of war mongers when virtually every elected official from both parties voted to go to war in Iraq...twice. And we can't really call the Democratic Party the party of working class people when they basically went along lock-step with the Republican party down the line in terms of decreasing the tax rates on top earners and signing into law austerity measures. Sure, there are matters of degrees between the two parties in terms of differences to the extent with which these tax policies and austerity measures were enacted. In the end, though, the differences are just that...a matter of degrees.
Perhaps the largest differences are to be found in specialized social wedge issues, but does it really matter as much if same-sex people get to legally marry or marijuana is slowly being made legal when the difference in pay bewteen CEOs and the other 90% of the nation is something on average of 500% and CLIMBING? Yet people would rather talk about who gets to pee in which North Carolina bath room than that.
I remember reading of a similar economic situation in France in the late 1700s. It didn't work out too well for the 1% back there and then.
We can't really call the GOP a bunch of war mongers when virtually every elected official from both parties voted to go to war in Iraq...twice. And we can't really call the Democratic Party the party of working class people when they basically went along lock-step with the Republican party down the line in terms of decreasing the tax rates on top earners and signing into law austerity measures. Sure, there are matters of degrees between the two parties in terms of differences to the extent with which these tax policies and austerity measures were enacted. In the end, though, the differences are just that...a matter of degrees.
Perhaps the largest differences are to be found in specialized social wedge issues, but does it really matter as much if same-sex people get to legally marry or marijuana is slowly being made legal when the difference in pay bewteen CEOs and the other 90% of the nation is something on average of 500% and CLIMBING? Yet people would rather talk about who gets to pee in which North Carolina bath room than that.
I remember reading of a similar economic situation in France in the late 1700s. It didn't work out too well for the 1% back there and then.
Comment