Trump Demands Inaction In Syria, Then Blames Obama For Inaction In Syria

[Nickdfresh]

My use of the phrase ground troops was vague, probably misapplied. What I should have said was along the lines of conventional/non-special operations ground troops engaged in in actual combat rather than primarily an assistance or training role.

I understad what you're saying, but the Marines sort of are involved, with fire missions at least, but not infantry combat - at least not yet...

[Nickdfresh]

And the asshat regime $5 in tarmac to repair the runway

The strike was an expensive popgun like something out of Conrad's Heart of Darkness, and I am sort of on the fence about it. But I wouldn't underestimate what the blow of losing even a few aircraft and facilities to the Syrian regime military is as they were once one of the most powerful air-forces in the Middle East and have been severally reduced since the war began. They're struggling to maintain sorties...

[Terry]

I understad what you're saying, but the Marines sort of are involved, with fire missions at least, but not infantry combat - at least not yet...

Yeah, but there was a lack of precision in what I said. If the totality of what I said was taken to a logical extreme, it would be easy to infer what I meant was that there were no US troops in Syria at all at the moment, which certainly is incorrect. Ground troops was my reference to what you rightly and concisely termed as infantry combat. US infantry combat troops alone engaging in unilateral conflict with Syrian factions isn't a winning strategy to my way of thinking.

[jacksmar]

Surely bombing from offshore alone isn't going to solve the situation in Syria long-term.

By definition it was a deliberate action. It certainly was swift.

Let's give you that it was both measured and proportional.

Where do we go from here?

Am not asking rhetorically because I have a multitude of smug retorts to whatever answer(s) I assume you might give.

Seriously, what do you think should happen next?

Terry, this is what happened next. While Nick, FORD, and sesh demand Trump step down, this has been going on for years.

Get rid of Assad.

[jacksmar]

The Russians are more-or-less friends with the Iranians that Trump wants to bomb so much, another one of your rightist bullshit inconsistencies. And if you want to save all those starving Koreans, feel free to sign back up old man, because a lot of other Koreans will die in that bloodbath if there is a war at the moment...

Spoken like a true commlib. Mutually assured destruction right? No other outcome. Watch the Pacific rim skies shortly, prof. I'm closer to centcom than you'd care to know. No need to sign back up. Shaky ol' jerksmear is doing just fine.

[Kristy]

shuthe t fcku up,you stu pid cu nt

[Nickdfresh]

Spoken like a true commlib. Mutually assured destruction right? No other outcome. Watch the Pacific rim skies shortly, prof. I'm closer to centcom than you'd care to know. No need to sign back up. Shaky ol' jerksmear is doing just fine.

You're dumber than you'd care to know...

I didn't say anything regarding MAD, moron...

[Kristy]

You can shut the fuck up, too Wiki Liki Diki Niki

[jacksmar]

You're dumber than you'd care to know...

I didn't say anything regarding MAD, moron...

No, you didn't prof buffalo. you implied we lose against the iran because the mighty flat broke russian bare is on the low cost oil side of iran. typical. can't fuck with the russians because the dempons are afraid. got to tell the world how mighty russia is, right adlai?

the party moved on down the road to mar-a-lago and the commander in chief is letting the generals do their job. and they're not afraid of lighting up the arctic to take out an airbase. would the leftovers be an ebb or flow, prof?

[Nickdfresh]

You can shut the fuck up, too Wiki Liki Diki Niki

Go get high, then fuck off, beauty school dropout...

[Nickdfresh]

No, you didn't prof buffalo. you implied we lose against the iran because the mighty flat broke russian bare is on the low cost oil side of iran. typical. can't fuck with the russians because the dempons are afraid. got to tell the world how mighty russia is, right adlai?

the party moved on down the road to mar-a-lago and the commander in chief is letting the generals do their job. and they're not afraid of lighting up the arctic to take out an airbase. would the leftovers be an ebb or flow, prof?

Kristy is a pothead loser and you're an incoherent drunk. Can you two sober up and actually post to WHAT I FUCKING SAID?

I was talking about a war in the Korean peninsula, moron.

[Nickdfresh]

shuthe t fcku up,you stu pid cu nt

[jacksmar]

Kristy is a pothead loser and you're an incoherent drunk. Can you two sober up and actually post to WHAT I FUCKING SAID?

I was talking about a war in the Korean peninsula, moron.

i'm so sorry prof. it must have been the words iranians and russians that you used that threw you off.


Trump said he would take care of the NK problem with or without China. One more time, Trump said he would take care of the NK problem with or without China.

find this in your common core curriculum: The US is the UN's designated custodian of the NK/SK cease fire and the ongoing negotiations.


try this prof: If NK goes nuke they will invade SK and will nuke Japan. SK and Japan are thinking that what China is suggesting is their destruction. And China is at its best, is a one party Communist regime.

Screw China and NK. They can be comms or whatever they want to be.
BUT, the US simply cannot let NK put a nuclear weapon to our head. ...

[Nickdfresh]

i'm so sorry prof. it must have been the words iranians and russians that you used that threw you off.


Trump said he would take care of the NK problem with or without China. One more time, Trump said he would take care of the NK problem with or without China.

find this in your common core curriculum: The US is the UN's designated custodian of the NK/SK cease fire and the ongoing negotiations.


try this prof: If NK goes nuke they will invade SK and will nuke Japan. SK and Japan are thinking that what China is suggesting is their destruction. And China is at its best, is a one party Communist regime.

Screw China and NK. They can be comms or whatever they want to be.
BUT, the US simply cannot let NK put a nuclear weapon to our head. ...

Don't worry, Trump isn't going to fix shit and the North Koreans already have a nuke or three. I'm pretty sure our 4,000 or so warheads will turn them into a parking lot and both South Korea can build nukes on a moment's notice...

[FORD]

Or maybe the Chinese will just roll in and take Lil' Kim out themselves? They probably don't want to add to their "bully" image, but it becomes a "lesser evil" in their eyes, if the only other option is a shit load of radiation floating around the Northeast provinces of China right when they're trying to clean up their air.

But then of course, there is a little piece of Russia that borders on NK as well, so how would Pooty react if China smacked the Norks down?