Trump Frump

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FORD
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    • Jan 2004
    • 58789

    The issue is that Drumpf accused the Miss Universe contestant of making a "sex tape" when all she actually did was act in a Mexican soap opera. In other words, no actual sex and not even naked. While himself appearing in a video that had naked chicks and sex in it, even if he wasn't directly involved in the sex.

    Or in other words, Drumpf is a big orange hypocrite. With tiny hands.
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

    Comment

    • twonabomber
      formerly F A T
      ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

      • Jan 2004
      • 11194

      Didn't see that part anywhere. Just people on FB going "OMG TRUMP IN PLAYBOY!" This not having pay TV and not watching much free TV any more is really paying off.

      I heard "Playboy" and thought who cares, Playboy had become semi-legit in the 90's.
      Last edited by twonabomber; 10-01-2016, 12:11 PM.
      Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

      Comment

      • cadaverdog
        ROTH ARMY SUPREME
        • Aug 2007
        • 8955

        Originally posted by FORD
        The issue is that Drumpf accused the Miss Universe contestant of making a "sex tape" when all she actually did was act in a Mexican soap opera. In other words, no actual sex and not even naked. While himself appearing in a video that had naked chicks and sex in it, even if he wasn't directly involved in the sex.

        Or in other words, Drumpf is a big orange hypocrite. With tiny hands.
        http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...h570566aad8398
        Here it is. She wasn't completely naked but it's not clear if they're really having sex or not. Looks like it to me. I don't speak spanish but supposedly she's telling him how wonderful his dick is.
        Beware of Dog

        Comment

        • DONNIEP
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Mar 2004
          • 13373

          Originally posted by Seshmeister
          I thought you just bought it for the articles?
          Looking back, I think I subscribed to Playboy because it seemed like the cool thing to do. Chicks seemed to think it was kinda cool too, of course this was before you could watch porn on your phone so most chicks had limited contact with that kinda stuff. I wonder if Playboy is still considered cool these days.
          American by birth. Southern by the grace of God.

          Comment

          • FORD
            ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

            • Jan 2004
            • 58789

            The first part of that clearly looks like a soap opera. The last part looks like a bad copycat of that dumb Paris Hilton "night vision" sex tape. Which still could have been part of the soap opera. I don't speak Spanish either, so it's hard to put the clip in context.
            Eat Us And Smile

            Cenk For America 2024!!

            Justice Democrats


            "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

            Comment

            • Nickdfresh
              SUPER MODERATOR

              • Oct 2004
              • 49205

              Trump's loser tax return bombshell:

              Donald Trump Tax Records Show He Could Have Avoided Taxes for Nearly Two Decades, The Times Found

              By DAVID BARSTOW, SUSANNE CRAIG, RUSS BUETTNER and MEGAN TWOHEYOCT. 1, 2016

              Trump’s Tax Records

              The New York Times obtained records from 1995 showing that Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss. The figure is so substantial that it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying federal income tax for 18 years. By AINARA TIEFENTHÄLER and GABRIEL DANCE on Publish Date October 1, 2016. Photo by Kathy Willens/Associated Press. Watch in Times Video »

              Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years, records obtained by The New York Times show.

              The 1995 tax records, never before disclosed, reveal the extraordinary tax benefits that Mr. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, derived from the financial wreckage he left behind in the early 1990s through mismanagement of three Atlantic City casinos, his ill-fated foray into the airline business and his ill-timed purchase of the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan.


              Tax experts hired by The Times to analyze Mr. Trump’s 1995 records said that tax rules especially advantageous to wealthy filers would have allowed Mr. Trump to use his $916 million loss to cancel out an equivalent amount of taxable income over an 18-year period.


              The REST @ NY Times

              Comment

              • cadaverdog
                ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                • Aug 2007
                • 8955

                Originally posted by FORD
                The first part of that clearly looks like a soap opera. The last part looks like a bad copycat of that dumb Paris Hilton "night vision" sex tape. Which still could have been part of the soap opera. I don't speak Spanish either, so it's hard to put the clip in context.
                The last part is supposedly real enough her fiancee at the time, a MLB player broke off their engagement.
                Beware of Dog

                Comment

                • Seshmeister
                  ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                  • Oct 2003
                  • 35197

                  Who gives the faintest fuck?

                  Comment

                  • cadaverdog
                    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 8955

                    Originally posted by DONNIEP
                    Looking back, I think I subscribed to Playboy because it seemed like the cool thing to do. Chicks seemed to think it was kinda cool too, of course this was before you could watch porn on your phone so most chicks had limited contact with that kinda stuff. I wonder if Playboy is still considered cool these days.
                    Last I heard they were getting rid of the nude pictorials and marketing as a rich man's magazine.
                    Beware of Dog

                    Comment

                    • cadaverdog
                      ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 8955

                      Originally posted by Seshmeister
                      Who gives the faintest fuck?
                      Obviously Ford does or he wouldn't have made this post.


                      "The issue is that Drumpf accused the Miss Universe contestant of making a "sex tape" when all she actually did was act in a Mexican soap opera. In other words, no actual sex and not even naked. While himself appearing in a video that had naked chicks and sex in it, even if he wasn't directly involved in the sex."

                      Or in other words, Drumpf is a big orange hypocrite. With tiny hands.

                      If the issue was a false allegation made by Trump and it's true I guess the "big orange hypocrite" Isn't as much of one as he's been accused to be.
                      Beware of Dog

                      Comment

                      • Seshmeister
                        ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                        • Oct 2003
                        • 35197

                        This is the president you want? The one in the middle of the night trying to find a sex tape of a Venezuelan beauty queen from 20 years ago?
                        While calling you stupid because you have paid tax?

                        Comment

                        • cadaverdog
                          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                          • Aug 2007
                          • 8955

                          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                          Trump's loser tax return bombshell:

                          [B][SIZE=2]
                          Trump’s Tax Records

                          The New York Times obtained records from 1995 showing that Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss. The figure is so substantial that it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying federal income tax for 18 years. By AINARA TIEFENTHÄLER and GABRIEL DANCE on Publish Date October 1, 2016. Photo by Kathy Willens/Associated Press. Watch in Times Video »

                          Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years, records obtained by The New York Times show.

                          The 1995 tax records, never before disclosed, reveal the extraordinary tax benefits that Mr. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, derive.


                          Tax experts hired by The Times to analyze Mr. Trump’s 1995 records said that tax rules especially advantageous to wealthy filers would have allowed Mr. Trump to use his $916 million loss to cancel out an equivalent amount of taxable income over an 18-year period.

                          How Long Do Capital Gains and Losses Carry Forward?
                          This key fact is important for taxes.

                          A capital gain occurs when an asset such as a stock or bond increases in value, making it worth more than what the holder initially paid for it. Similarly, a capital loss occurs when an asset decreases in value, making it worth less than its original purchase price.

                          Capital gains and losses are reported to the IRS on income taxes. However, the IRS does not require filers to report gains or losses until the assets in question are actually sold off. Once an asset is sold at either a profit or a loss, it's considered a realized gain or loss and must be reported accordingly.

                          Short-term capital gains versus long-term capital gains
                          Capital gains are categorized as either long-term or short-term. If an asset is held for more than one year and then sold for a higher price than the original purchase, it's considered a long-term capital gain. An asset held for less than a year and sold at a profit is considered a short-term capital gain.

                          Each type of capital gain comes with its own tax implications. Short-term capital gains are taxed as ordinary income, whereas long-term capital gains taxes are typically capped at 15% for most taxpayers, which is generally lower than the rate applied to ordinary income. Furthermore, low-income individuals may not be subject to long-term capital gains taxes at all. The long-term versus short-term distinction applies to capital losses as well, but from a tax perspective, there's really no difference in treatment.

                          Carrying gains and losses forward
                          If capital losses exceed capital gains, the filer is entitled to claim a deduction against the loss in the amount of $3,000 or the total net loss, whichever is less. When a net capital loss exceeds the $3,000 limit, it can be carried forward to future years.

                          In the following year, the loss carried forward would first be used to offset potential capital gains. If capital losses still exceed capital gains, the filer can claim up to $3,000 as a loss and continue doing so year over year until the net loss amount is reduced to zero.

                          Capital gains, however, cannot be carried forward. Once an asset is sold for more than its original purchase price and a gain is realized, the gain must be declared in full on that year's taxes. For this reason, those looking to sell off assets should do so strategically to minimize any potential tax burden that might ensue.

                          Obviously you can't write off 919 million dollars in capital gains losses in 19 years at 3 grand a year max. I'll have to look into it a little farther to find out how much you have to make a year to write off more than 3 grand a year in capital gains
                          Beware of Dog

                          Comment

                          • cadaverdog
                            ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                            • Aug 2007
                            • 8955

                            Originally posted by Seshmeister
                            This is the president you want? The one in the middle of the night trying to find a sex tape of a Venezuelan beauty queen from 20 years ago?
                            While calling you stupid because you have paid tax?
                            I couldn't care less about the first part but Trump blurting out "It's because I'm smart" when Hillary mentioned he hadn't paid taxes in 20+years chapped my hide a little.
                            Beware of Dog

                            Comment

                            • twonabomber
                              formerly F A T
                              ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                              • Jan 2004
                              • 11194

                              Originally posted by cadaverdog
                              Last I heard they were getting rid of the nude pictorials and marketing as a rich man's magazine.
                              It's already happened. My friend has given me the new non-nude issues but I haven't had time to look at them.
                              Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

                              Comment

                              • twonabomber
                                formerly F A T
                                ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                                • Jan 2004
                                • 11194

                                Originally posted by DONNIEP
                                Looking back, I think I subscribed to Playboy because it seemed like the cool thing to do. Chicks seemed to think it was kinda cool too, of course this was before you could watch porn on your phone so most chicks had limited contact with that kinda stuff. I wonder if Playboy is still considered cool these days.
                                I got a subscription for my 17th birthday. Kept renewing until 1999 or 2000, can't remember.

                                I'd catch my ex leafing through them and at one point she had tried to get in the magazine. I think it was before they started the Playmate search trips. They sent her a letter detailing what they wanted, pics and a bio.
                                Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

                                Comment

                                Working...