Dave for the 21st Century

[katie]

I was listening to Gary Moore 'Still Got the Blues' and was thinking how well he did back in 89/90 to re-invent himself like that.

I reckon Dave could also pull off a great blues CD.

1)He has a great voice for this kind of stuff.
2) It could be maybe a have covers half originals CD
3) It would be great if he could work with some great blues players (this would make the CD span across many fan bases)
4) A great way to maybe go for a *new* audience and re-invent a whole new stage show.

Well i would go for it.

What do you lot think?

[CROWBAR]

I totally agree with you on this Katie. DLR certainly has that certain something to his voice, not to mention all of his MANY life experiences to draw from.

[Denny]

Re: Dave for the 21st Century

Originally posted by katie
I was listening to Gary Moore 'Still Got the Blues' and was thinking how well he did back in 89/90 to re-invent himself like that.

I reckon Dave could also pull off a great blues CD.

1)He has a great voice for this kind of stuff.
2) It could be maybe a have covers half originals CD
3) It would be great if he could work with some great blues players (this would make the CD span across many fan bases)
4) A great way to maybe go for a *new* audience and re-invent a whole new stage show.

Well i would go for it.

What do you lot think?

1) Dave's voice isn't good, period.

2) It could be....

3) There are no "GRATE" blues players within the budget Dave has available for a "BLUES" project.

4) I can't see him competing with "Green Day" or "Maroon 5" or "John Mayer" can any of you????


Have a Nice Day™

[Hardrock69]

1. What is "good"? What is "bad"? Mick Jagger sucks donkey balls, but he has had a career that has lasted over 40 years...
Dave can sing, whether you wish to believe it or not.

2. Could be.

3. Due to the fact Dave is a multi-millionaire, he could easily afford any blues player he wanted.

4. No, it is the other way around. I cannot see any of those pussy/loser/sellout bands competing with Dave.

[Denny]

Originally posted by Hardrock69
1. What is "good"? What is "bad"? Mick Jagger sucks donkey balls, but he has had a career that has lasted over 40 years...
Dave can sing, whether you wish to believe it or not.

2. Could be.

3. Due to the fact Dave is a multi-millionaire, he could easily afford any blues player he wanted.

4. No, it is the other way around. I cannot see any of those pussy/loser/sellout bands competing with Dave.

1) Mick Jagger has HAIR.

2) Who Gives A Fuck

3) NOBODY with TALENT or a DECENT CAREER in their RIGHT MIND will work for David Lee Roth.

4) In 1996 Dave MIGHT have been able to compete....only reason being was veryone though he was back in Van Halen....


Have a Nice Day™

[Denny]

Originally posted by Hardrock69
1. What is "good"? What is "bad"? Mick Jagger sucks donkey balls, but he has had a career that has lasted over 40 years...
Dave can sing, whether you wish to believe it or not.

2. Could be.

3. Due to the fact Dave is a multi-millionaire, he could easily afford any blues player he wanted.

4. No, it is the other way around. I cannot see any of those pussy/loser/sellout bands competing with Dave.

3. Due to the Fact Dave is playing to crowds of 500 to 1000 people he is a spent fucking force in Music.

4. Look at no.3

Have a Nice Day™

[katie]

Denny you are a negative cunt aren't you?
Are you sure this is the place for you?

[Denny]

Originally posted by katie
Denny you are a negative cunt aren't you?
Are you sure this is the place for you?

Negative, No. Realistic.....Yes.

I like to see people made fools of themselves, so yes....this place is kinda of Interesting and entertaining somewhat.

[katie]

Originally posted by Denny
Negative, No. Realistic.....Yes.

I like to see people made fools of themselves, so yes....this place is kinda of Interesting and entertaining somewhat.

Realistic, In what way please explain

[katie]

Originally posted by katie
Realistic, In what way please explain

Just read some of your old (locked threads)
Don't bother responding to the above.
Sheep Alert! Sheep Alert!
Let's get this fucker in the pen asap!

[Denny]

Originally posted by katie
Just read some of your old (locked threads)
Don't bother responding to the above.
Sheep Alert! Sheep Alert!
Let's get this fucker in the pen asap!

[GAR]

Re: Re: Dave for the 21st Century

Originally posted by Denny
I can't see him competing with "Green Day" or "Maroon 5" or "John Mayer" can any of you????

He doesn't have to because their respective genre slots ain't Classic Rock.

[Denny]

Re: Re: Re: Dave for the 21st Century

Originally posted by GAR
He doesn't have to because their respective genre slots ain't Classic Rock.

Dave is classic alright....

LOOK AT ALL THE PEOPLE HERE TONIGHT!!!!!

[Katydid]

Originally posted by Denny
1) Dave's voice isn't good, period.

2) It could be....

3) There are no "GRATE" blues players within the budget Dave has available for a "BLUES" project.

4) I can't see him competing with "Green Day" or "Maroon 5" or "John Mayer" can any of you????


If Dave wants to cut a blues album I can set him with Fat Possum Records anytime...

Heck I even have a blues song I wrote and put on a demo one time.

I'm sure Bruce and Steve would do everything they could to help him.

They had a documentary done on them for TV...they took (Burnside who owns it) took cotton pickers from the cotton patch and made them well know.) Out of Oxford, MS.

They are nice guys and started sending me stuff and I began to post it on Embryo Songs website, now a lot of the guys are playing all over the world.



Have a Nice Day™

[Katydid]

Sorry Katie from the UK...got tangles up with Denny there.