Tweet
The Writing's On The Wall
Writing's on wall
George Bush's message of freedom is there for whole world to view
By Paul Jackson -- Calgary Sun
Ah, Ah! -- The usually arrogant Liberal-Left seems uncharacteristically subdued these days.
Perhaps over at CBS-TV, anchorman Dan Rather -- who has tried to stick the knife in the backs of every Republican president from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush -- may even be having a silent sulk.
And 12,000 termite-type lawyers who had planned to thwart the American voter at every touch and turn by challenging election results on the most feeble of excuses -- for huge globs of money, of course -- have suddenly had to backpedal.
One guesses that when Bush bettered presidential contender John Kerry by 3.5 million votes, even the most fervid Democratic insider knew that the jig was up.
This was no squeaker, as it was with Al Gore in 2000 or suspicious bundles of ballots for John F. Kennedy in 1960.
It was an overwhelming endorsement of Bush's foreign and domestic -- mainly tax-cutting -- policies.
I'll give it to Kerry, he conceded quickly and with grace.
Too bad his attitude was not shared by his running mate John Edwards, a super rich class-action lawyer who actually was hoping Kerry would try to find some loophole to fight the result.
There were to be no loopholes.
So the smirks are gone from the Lib-Left set for a time and the likes of the haughty New York Times and the Washington Post commentators may also be sniffing their ways into their offices.
Considering the plagiarism charges that blow up at these so-called august bodies, one would have thought they would be a little more temperate in their judgments of Bush and his team.
Maybe now they will be.
The "thinkers" in the Democratic halls -- if there are actually any thinkers in those halls -- must know their party is out of step with mainstream Americans.
Mainstream Americans, we now know, are in step with Bush's vision of the world and of America itself.
The Lib-Left media and "academia" tried to do to Bush what they tried to do to Ronald Reagan. That is, paint them as lightweight fools way, way out of their depth.
These maggots -- and they are maggots -- failed with Reagan, who turned out to dramatically change history by defeating Soviet Communism, and they will fail with Bush, who, just as Reagan freed hundreds of millions in the Soviet empire from servitude, may well free hundreds of millions in servitude to sheiks and dictators in the Middle East.
Despite what the likes of Rather and other pundits with an axe to grind say, the toppling of Saddam Hussein and the coming of democracy to Iraq, is a success already.
Recall that it took six years to beat the Axis power in the Second World War.
The Cold War itself lasted for a nail-biting 45 years before the Berlin Wall collapsed.
When democratic Iraq is up and running, there may well be a lightening domino effect that will see sheikdom after sheikdom falling across the Middle East with masses who have never known freedom before -- particularly oppressed women -- seeing it for the first time.
All thanks to George W. Bush, with some help from Britain's Tony Blair and Australia's John Howard, but naturally none from Paul Martin's Canada.
Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, on seeing the U.S. assault on Iraq, quickly decided to give up state-sponsored
terrorism and come to the table.
If Gadhafi has seen the writing on the wall, other Middle East dictators must be having their own secret thoughts, too.
Make peace with the U.S. while you still can and save what you can of your regime.
Like Reagan, George W. Bush will come out of his two-term presidency a hero of historic proportions.
What of 2008?
Well, you can look through name after name in the Democratic roster for a star candidate for the next race and the only one that will pop up is the awful, awful Hillary Clinton, who is anathema even to many in her own party.
She greedily hungers for the top job -- but she won't get it.
What she will do is tear her party apart in the process.
Look for a lengthy period of Republican rule.
And for many, many years of sleeping soundly at night.
George Bush's message of freedom is there for whole world to view
By Paul Jackson -- Calgary Sun
Ah, Ah! -- The usually arrogant Liberal-Left seems uncharacteristically subdued these days.
Perhaps over at CBS-TV, anchorman Dan Rather -- who has tried to stick the knife in the backs of every Republican president from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush -- may even be having a silent sulk.
And 12,000 termite-type lawyers who had planned to thwart the American voter at every touch and turn by challenging election results on the most feeble of excuses -- for huge globs of money, of course -- have suddenly had to backpedal.
One guesses that when Bush bettered presidential contender John Kerry by 3.5 million votes, even the most fervid Democratic insider knew that the jig was up.
This was no squeaker, as it was with Al Gore in 2000 or suspicious bundles of ballots for John F. Kennedy in 1960.
It was an overwhelming endorsement of Bush's foreign and domestic -- mainly tax-cutting -- policies.
I'll give it to Kerry, he conceded quickly and with grace.
Too bad his attitude was not shared by his running mate John Edwards, a super rich class-action lawyer who actually was hoping Kerry would try to find some loophole to fight the result.
There were to be no loopholes.
So the smirks are gone from the Lib-Left set for a time and the likes of the haughty New York Times and the Washington Post commentators may also be sniffing their ways into their offices.
Considering the plagiarism charges that blow up at these so-called august bodies, one would have thought they would be a little more temperate in their judgments of Bush and his team.
Maybe now they will be.
The "thinkers" in the Democratic halls -- if there are actually any thinkers in those halls -- must know their party is out of step with mainstream Americans.
Mainstream Americans, we now know, are in step with Bush's vision of the world and of America itself.
The Lib-Left media and "academia" tried to do to Bush what they tried to do to Ronald Reagan. That is, paint them as lightweight fools way, way out of their depth.
These maggots -- and they are maggots -- failed with Reagan, who turned out to dramatically change history by defeating Soviet Communism, and they will fail with Bush, who, just as Reagan freed hundreds of millions in the Soviet empire from servitude, may well free hundreds of millions in servitude to sheiks and dictators in the Middle East.
Despite what the likes of Rather and other pundits with an axe to grind say, the toppling of Saddam Hussein and the coming of democracy to Iraq, is a success already.
Recall that it took six years to beat the Axis power in the Second World War.
The Cold War itself lasted for a nail-biting 45 years before the Berlin Wall collapsed.
When democratic Iraq is up and running, there may well be a lightening domino effect that will see sheikdom after sheikdom falling across the Middle East with masses who have never known freedom before -- particularly oppressed women -- seeing it for the first time.
All thanks to George W. Bush, with some help from Britain's Tony Blair and Australia's John Howard, but naturally none from Paul Martin's Canada.
Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, on seeing the U.S. assault on Iraq, quickly decided to give up state-sponsored
terrorism and come to the table.
If Gadhafi has seen the writing on the wall, other Middle East dictators must be having their own secret thoughts, too.
Make peace with the U.S. while you still can and save what you can of your regime.
Like Reagan, George W. Bush will come out of his two-term presidency a hero of historic proportions.
What of 2008?
Well, you can look through name after name in the Democratic roster for a star candidate for the next race and the only one that will pop up is the awful, awful Hillary Clinton, who is anathema even to many in her own party.
She greedily hungers for the top job -- but she won't get it.
What she will do is tear her party apart in the process.
Look for a lengthy period of Republican rule.
And for many, many years of sleeping soundly at night.
Comment