PDA

View Full Version : Intelligence Chief: Iraq Battling More than 200,000 Insurgents



DLR'sCock
01-03-2005, 10:02 PM
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?ID=35545


Iraq Battling More than 200,000 Insurgents: Intelligence Chief
Agence France-Presse

Monday 03 January 2005

Baghdad - Iraq's insurgency counts more than 200,000 active fighters and sympathisers, the country's national intelligence chief told AFP, in the bleakest assessment to date of the armed revolt waged by Sunni Muslims.

"I think the resistance is bigger than the US military in Iraq. I think the resistance is more than 200,000 people," Iraqi intelligence service director General Mohamed Abdullah Shahwani said in an interview ahead of the January 30 elections.

Shahwani said the number includes at least 40,000 hardcore fighters but rises to more than 200,000 members counting part-time fighters and volunteers who provide rebels everything from intelligence and logistics to shelter.

The numbers far exceed any figure presented by the US military in Iraq, which has struggled to get a handle on the size of the resistance since toppling Saddam Hussein's regime in April 2003.

A senior US military officer declined to endorse or dismiss the spy chief's numbers.

"As for the size of the insurgency, we don't have good resolution on the size," the officer said on condition of anonymity.

Past US military assessments on the insurgency's size have been revised upwards from 5,000 to 20,000 full and part-time members, in the last half year, most recently in October.

Defense experts said it was impossible to divine the insurgency's total number, but called Shahwani's estimate a valid guess, with as much credence, if not more, than any US numbers.

"I believe General Shahwani's estimation, given that he is referring predominantly to active sympathizers and supporters and to part-time as well as full-time active insurgents, may not be completely out of the ballpark," said defense analyst Bruce Hoffman who served as an advisor to the US occupation in Iraq and now works for US-based think-tank RAND Corporation.

Compared to the coalition's figure, he said: "General Shahwani's - however possibly high it may be, might well give a more accurate picture of the situation."

Anthony Cordesman, an Iraq analyst with the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, put Shahwani's estimates on an equal footing with the American's.

"The Iraqi figures do... recognize the reality that the insurgency in Iraq has broad support in Sunni areas while the US figures down play this to the point of denial."

Shahwani said the resistance enjoys wide backing in the provinces of Baghdad, Babel, Salahuddin, Diyala, Nineveh and Tamim, homes to Sunni Arabs who fear they will lose influence after the elections.

Insurgents have gained strength through Iraq's tight-knit tribal bonds and links to the old 400,000-strong Iraqi army, dissolved by the US occupation in May 2003 two months after the US-led invasion, he said.

"People are fed up after two years, without improvement. People are fed up with no security, no electricity, people feel they have to do something. The army was hundreds of thousands. You'd expect some veterans would join with their relatives, each one has sons and brothers."

The rebels have turned city neighborhoods and small towns around central Iraq into virtual no-go zones despite successful US military efforts to reclaim former enclaves like Samarra and Fallujah, he said.

"What are you going to call the situation here (in Baghdad) when 20 to 30 men can move around with weapons and no one can get them in Adhamiyah, Dura and Ghazaliya," he said, naming neighborhoods in the capital.

The spy chief also questioned the success of the November campaign to retake Fallujah, which US forces have hailed as a major victory against the resistance.

"What we have now is an empty city almost destroyed... and most of the insurgents are free. They have gone either to Mosul or to Baghdad or other areas."

Shahwani pointed to a resurgent Baath party as the key to the insurgency's might. The Baath has split into three factions, with the deadliest being the branch still paying allegiance to jailed dictator Saddam Hussein, he said.

Shahwani said the core Baath fighting strength was more than 20,000.

Operating out of Syria, Saddam's half-brother Sabawi Ibrahim al-Hassan and former aide Mohamed Yunis al-Ahmed are providing funding and tapping their connections to old army divisions, particularily in Mosul, Samarra, Baquba, Kirkuk and Tikrit.

Saddam's henchman, Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, still on the lam in Iraq, is also involved, he said.

Another two factions, which have broken from Saddam, are also around, but have yet to mount any attacks. The Baath are complemented by Islamist factions ranging from Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al-Qaeda affiliate to Ansar al-Sunna and Ansar al-Islam.

Asked if the insurgents were winning, Shahwani answered: "I would say they aren't losing."

-------

DEMON CUNT
01-03-2005, 10:41 PM
This is not good news. Ready the flag draped coffins!

LoungeMachine
01-03-2005, 10:55 PM
Nah, this can't be true.

Rummy said it's just a few leftovers from Sadaam.

And Rummy knows his shit.

Why would he lie?

Nickdfresh
01-03-2005, 11:22 PM
It's amazing how we keep making the same intelligence mistakes from war to war. i've read of exactly the same shit happening in Vietnam where the military and intelligence agencies kept low balling Viet Cong/National Liberation Front numbers until a renegade CIA analyst upped finally the estimate. He was largely proven correct after the war. We always underestimate our enemies for political reasons.

"Know thy enemy and know thy self
and you will win a hundred battles."
-- Sun-tzu, The Art of War

DEMON CUNT
01-04-2005, 01:09 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
It's amazing how we keep making the same intelligence mistakes from war to war.

You should check out Fog Of War (http://www.sonyclassics.com/fogofwar/). It's a documentary about Robert McNamara, former US Secretary of Defence under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. It's fantastic!

From IMDB.com:
"(McNamara) talks about his work as a bombing statistician during World War II, his brief tenure as president of Ford Motor Company, and the Kennedy administration's triumph during the Cuban Missle Crisis. However, the film focuses primarily on his failures in Vietnam."

If that is your bag- definitely check out The Trials of Henry Kissinger (http://www.thetrialsofhenrykissinger.com/trials.html).

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 07:41 AM
Originally posted by DLR'sCock
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?ID=35545


Iraq Battling More than 200,000 Insurgents: Intelligence Chief
Agence France-Presse

Monday 03 January 2005

Baghdad - Iraq's insurgency counts more than 200,000 active fighters and sympathisers, the country's -------
Out of a country of 28 million people I'd put the number closer to a minimun of 900,000 armed fighers up to 26-27 million people who don't want the U.S. in their country of Iraq and millions and millions more in the Middle East who don't want the U.S. in their Muslim "Homeland."

It's later..much, much later than you all think.


:spank:

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 07:45 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
It's amazing how we keep making the same intelligence mistakes from war to war. i've read of exactly the same shit happening in Vietnam where the military and intelligence agencies kept low balling Viet Cong/National Liberation Front numbers until a renegade CIA analyst upped finally the estimate. He was largely proven correct after the war. We always underestimate our enemies for political reasons.

"Know thy enemy and know thy self
and you will win a hundred battles."
-- Sun-tzu, The Art of War
oooooh nick

in politics there are NO "mistakes"

in politics there are no accidents

it's all by plan

they all knew you'd all be speaking about Iraq on your lips -- and they'd be making the money and the troops would be taking their orders, they knew it all, because they make the plans of the future you don't know about and so you see "mistakes" and "accidents"..

there aren't any

it's all going by plan

true dat


:spank:

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 07:56 AM
Originally posted by Phil theStalker
Out of a country of 28 million people I'd put the number closer to a minimun of 900,000 armed fighers up to 26-27 million people who don't want the U.S. in their country of Iraq and millions and millions more in the Middle East who don't want the U.S. in their Muslim "Homeland."

It's later..much, much later than you all think.


:spank:
Going back to my own common sense intelligence before I've even set foot on the ground in Iraq as these CIA info dudes have and I can also tell you the over extended 150,00 U.S. troops planned and ordered to be in Iraq are up against several million armed Middle Easterners of upwards to 6 million minimum, and they have not yet begun to fight.

150,000 vs 6,000,000 (minimum).

Who's going to win that?

So these "200,000" insurgents, actually if there are 200,000 "insurgents" in Iraq and 150,000 U.S. troops then WHO DOESN'T BELONG THERE THE 200,000 MUSLIMS OR THE 150,000 U.S. TROOPS FROM NORTH AMERICA?

I think the 150,000 troops don't belong there and they better get the hell out of there before millions of armed Muslims pick up the fight for THEIR religious Muslim oil rich "Homeland."

And if you're worried about the "terroists" setting off a nuke in a U.S. city, if they have one, a nuke, why don't they just keep it in the Middle East and wipe out 10,000's of U.S. trooper boys without the smuggling hassle over to the U.S.. Why not?

It's the one world government plan.

It's not your plan.

Stop supporting it.

It will be yours and America's downfall.

It's time for troops to start shooting their officers and come back home. (sic)

It's so much later than you think.


:spank:

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 08:17 AM
HAHA!

Let's me get this straight.

There are "200,000" Muslims in Iraq -- and GROWING, the heart of Muslim land, and there are "150,000" U.S. troops from North America who are mainly Christian (and their churches and families are NOT in Iraq) and it's the 200,000 and GROWING Muslims who better get out of Iraq.

I don't think so.

You people who agree with U.S. troops, the powerful "150,000," being in Iraq forcing with violence Christian democracy on millions and millions and millions of Muslims had better get straight about how things really happen in the world.

It's later than you think.

Fools.


P

DrMaddVibe
01-04-2005, 08:38 AM
So it's been declared a Holy War?

That's why they're streaming across the borders to take up arms?

Don't "short-change" the American military. The soldiers of today aren't the soldiers of the Vietnam era. At some point the people of Iraq are going to have to stand on their own 2 feet and act like they want Freedom.

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 08:44 AM
Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
So it's been declared a Holy War?

That's why they're streaming across the borders to take up arms?

Don't "short-change" the American military. The soldiers of today aren't the soldiers of the Vietnam era. At some point the people of Iraq are going to have to stand on their own 2 feet and act like they want Freedom.
You big talking fool.

This is NOT a fucking contest of "don't give up on."

The soldiers of today are just like the soldiers of yesterday back to Rome back to Sumeria. A soldier is a soldier. A soldier never beats a religion in history. (sic)

What kind of fantasy world are you living in?


P

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 08:47 AM
Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
So it's been declared a Holy War?

That's why they're streaming across the borders to take up arms?

Don't "short-change" the American military. The soldiers of today aren't the soldiers of the Vietnam era. At some point the people of Iraq are going to have to stand on their own 2 feet and act like they want Freedom.
Hey, they're Muslims.

I don't see a bunch of white Christians streaming across the border and that doesn't look good if I'm white, Christain, and my church and my family is in North America.

These guys Mosques are there.

Mosque: the house of prayer for Isalm.

And the U.S. doesn't belong shooting from them with snipers.

No respect for religion.

You will be taugh respect by those Muslims.

A war like this is not going away and the U.S. can, and will, only lose it.

By plan.

By plan you are going to be taken down as a nation, but you don't see it coming.


P

ODShowtime
01-04-2005, 08:57 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
"Know thy enemy and know thy self
and you will win a hundred battles."
-- Sun-tzu, The Art of War


Our military leadership is supposed to understand this. They did during the Gulf War, and it showed. But ever since walker texas ranger stepped into office, the whole thing has been dumbed down. Not that anyone around here would notice.

We're supposed to be the best country with the smartest military on the planet. And yet we sit, unprepared, in a fuckin' guerilla war. A foreseeable one. This fucking sucks.

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 09:07 AM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
Our military leadership is supposed to understand this. They did during the Gulf War, and it showed. But ever since walker texas ranger stepped into office, the whole thing has been dumbed down. Not that anyone around here would notice.

We're supposed to be the best country with the smartest military on the planet. And yet we sit, unprepared, in a fuckin' guerilla war. A foreseeable one. This fucking sucks.
"Unprepared"?

It's all been "planned."

And you're mistaken saying "smartest" military.

The military doesn't formulate foreign policy.

Civilain politicians do that.

And they're smart enough to make you keep thinking they didn't know what they'd be facing.

They only people who didn't know what they'd be facing were the U.S. grunt, his wife, his family, his mother and father, his neighbors, his congressman have all been lied to.

Again.

Meanwhile the death toll rises and America gets weaker and soon to give up the ghost by a one world government plan to take the highest ranking sovereign nation state DOWN.

Enter the one world government.

It's common knowledge on Captial Hill. It's even treason, but not in your mind.

It's later than you think.


P

Nickdfresh
01-04-2005, 10:27 AM
Originally posted by Phil theStalker
"Unprepared"?

It's all been "planned."

And you're mistaken saying "smartest" military.

The military doesn't formulate foreign policy.

Civilain politicians do that.

And they're smart enough to make you keep thinking they didn't know what they'd be facing.

They only people who didn't know what they'd be facing were the U.S. grunt, his wife, his family, his mother and father, his neighbors, his congressman have all been lied to.

Again.

Meanwhile the death toll rises and America gets weaker and soon to give up the ghost by a one world government plan to take the highest ranking sovereign nation state DOWN.

Enter the one world government.

It's common knowledge on Captial Hill. It's even treason, but not in your mind.

It's later than you think.


P

Phil, these people are too incompetent to hold together a conspiracy!

Phil theStalker
01-04-2005, 10:35 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Phil, these people are too incompetent to hold together a conspiracy!
I can't believe YOU believe that.

That's what they want you to believe though.


P