PDA

View Full Version : Bin Laden Avoided Capture at Tora Bora



Nickdfresh
03-23-2005, 01:32 PM
Maybe if we sent some more troops to Afghanistan at the time, instead of holding them in reserve for Iraq, we would have gotten the cunt?! Nice job Dubya!:mad:

Bin Laden Evaded U.S. Forces
Document Says U.S. Holding al-Qaida Leader Who Helped Bin Laden Escape Tora Bora Attack

By ROBERT BURNS
The Associated PressThe Associated Press

WASHINGTON Mar 23, 2005 — A commander for Osama bin Laden during Afghanistan's war with the Soviet Union who helped the al-Qaida leader escape American forces at Tora Bora is being held by U.S. authorities, a government document says.

The document represents the first definitive statement from the Pentagon that bin Laden, the mastermind of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was at Tora Bora and evaded his pursuers.

President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney asserted during the presidential election that commanders did not know whether bin Laden was at Tora Bora when U.S. and allied Afghan forces attacked there in December 2001. They dismissed assertions by Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee, that the military had missed a chance to capture or kill bin Laden while al-Qaida made a last stand in the mountainous area along the Pakistan border.

The document, provided to The Associated Press in response to a Freedom of Information request, says the detainee held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "assisted in the escape of Osama bin Laden from Tora Bora." While not identified by name or nationality, he is described as being "associated with" al-Qaida and having called for a holy war against the United States.

In an indication that he might be a higher-level operative, the document says the detainee "had bodyguards" and collaborated with regional al-Qaida leadership. "The detainee was one of Osama bin Laden's commanders during the Soviet jihad," it says, referring to the holy war against Soviet occupiers in the 1980s.

The document is what the Pentagon calls a "summary of evidence" and was presented against one of 558 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay on Dec. 14 for a hearing to determine whether the prisoner was correctly held as an "enemy combatant." The assertion about his efforts and bin Laden's escape is made as a statement of fact; it does not indicate how the information was obtained.

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Daryl Borgquist, a spokesman for the Combatant Status Review Board for which the document was prepared, said Tuesday he could not elaborate on the Tora Bora statement, or its sources, because the statement was derived from classified...

In mid-December 2001, a spokesman for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem, told reporters there had been "indicators" of bin Laden's presence at Tora Bora in early December. "And now indicators are not there," Stufflebeem said. "So maybe he still is there, maybe he was killed, or maybe he's left."

While campaigning for president last fall, Kerry said Bush had erred in relying on Afghan warlords to hunt down bin Laden in the caves of Tora Bora in December 2001, contending on Oct. 22 that the president had "outsourced" the job.

Cheney said Oct. 26 that Gen. Tommy Franks, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, had "stated repeatedly it was not at all certain that bin Laden was in Tora Bora. He might have been there or in Pakistan or even Kashmir," the Indian-controlled Himalayan region.

Franks, now retired, wrote in an opinion column in The New York Times on Oct. 19, "We don't know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden was at Tora Bora in December 2001." He added that intelligence assessments of his location varied, but bin Laden was "never within our grasp."

On several occasions Bush cited the column as evidence that bin Laden could have been in any of several countries in December 2001. "That's what Tommy Franks, who knew what he's talking about, said," Bush said on Oct. 27.

Bin Laden remains at large. For many months, officials have said they believe he probably is hiding in the Afghan-Pakistan border region. Last week Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined to endorse that view, saying bin Laden's whereabouts are unknown.

Among documents stating the U.S. government's evidence against other detainees at Guantanamo Bay is a September 2004 assertion that an unidentified detainee, described as a member of al-Qaida, had traveled from the United States to Afghanistan in November 2001 two months after the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

The document does not elaborate on the detainee's U.S. connection but says he arrived in Afghanistan via Bahrain and Iran. He was "present at Tora Bora," crossed the Afghan border into Pakistan in December 2001, and surrendered to Pakistani authorities, the document says.

The detainee also was arrested by Saudi authorities for questioning in the 1996 terrorist bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 members of the U.S. Air Force, the document says.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=605920&page=3

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Warham
03-23-2005, 01:37 PM
I agree with the respected general, Tommy Franks, a man who has served our country through many administrations, Democrat and Republican.

FORD
03-23-2005, 04:41 PM
I wonder if Franks' sudden retirement had anything to do with his experience in Afghanistan. Maybe he realized how the BCE used him, and he wanted out before he got stuck with the even bigger scam of Iraq.

Warham
03-23-2005, 04:51 PM
He's said nothing but lovely things about Bush, something he hasn't had to do.

BigBadBrian
03-23-2005, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by Warham
I agree with the respected general, Tommy Franks, a man who has served our country through many administrations, Democrat and Republican.

Although he served honorably under many Administrations, he retired under Bush, Warham. Using Liberal logic, he's a BCE operative.

Warham
03-23-2005, 04:59 PM
Oh yeahhhhh. Thanks for setting me straight on that, Brian.

DLR'sCock
03-23-2005, 05:08 PM
look Bin Laden is more useful to Bush alive and running and planning to kill...

BigBadBrian
03-23-2005, 05:11 PM
Originally posted by DLR'sCock
look Bin Laden is more useful to Bush alive and running and palnning to kill...

Maybe before the election, Cock, but now I think his capture would be the feather in Bush's cap for his second term. Zarqawi and others are on the loose to take bin Laden's place anyway. That's the structure of al-Qaeda...no one is irreplaceable.

We'll see. :gulp:

Warham
03-23-2005, 05:15 PM
According to some wacked-out conspiracy theorists, the BCE already have him in custody, and are going to reveal that just before the 2004 elections, so Bush wins in a landslide.

...

Oops, guess that conspiracy didn't pan out, did it? But the end result was the same.

DLR'sCock
03-23-2005, 05:23 PM
Originally posted by Warham
According to some wacked-out conspiracy theorists, the BCE already have him in custody, and are going to reveal that just before the 2004 elections, so Bush wins in a landslide.

...

Oops, guess that conspiracy didn't pan out, did it? But the end result was the same.


Hmmm they were close, the FRIDAY around 5pm EST, b4 the election, Bin Laden makes a big threat that is REVEALED to the nation on everyones Tele for all to see, and is the last big story of the weekend and everyone forgets abotu the FBI probe into Halliburton and Cheney..... ....that predictably gains the outcome it intended...

Bush is good for Bin Laden, as Bin Laden is good for Bush...


If you think for one minute that members of the Bin Laden family don't communicate with Osama...then you are truly Naive....


the Bush family and the Bin Laden family have a 30 year business/friendship relationship....do you really think all ties are 100% cut off???

and life moves on....

Guitar Shark
03-23-2005, 05:30 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Maybe before the election, Cock, but now I think his capture would be the feather in Bush's cap for his second term.

That would be a dunce cap, I presume. ;)

ODShowtime
03-23-2005, 09:37 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Although he served honorably under many Administrations, he retired under Bush, Warham. Using Liberal logic, he's a BCE operative.

Franks wasn't advocating the war, only doing his duty as a soldier. Big difference there sparky.

Nickdfresh
03-24-2005, 12:14 AM
In any case, the fox slipped out of the hen house while farmer Dubya was waxing the old ladies muff!

ODShowtime
03-24-2005, 07:45 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
In any case, the fox slipped out of the hen house while farmer Dubya was waxing the old ladies muff!

I don't know Nick... gw looks like the type that's never had a taste of honey...

BigBadBrian
03-24-2005, 09:03 AM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
I don't know Nick... gw looks like the type that's never had a taste of honey...

Exactly why you types won't get a chance at that Golden Honey in the Big White House for a looooong time with thoughts like that....sparky. :bananna:

Nickdfresh
03-24-2005, 10:36 AM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Exactly why you types won't get a chance at that Golden Honey in the Big White House for a looooong time with thoughts like that....sparky. :bananna:

I guess only cocksuckers can get into the White House nowadays, huh BigBadBlunder?

In any case, with all due respect to the General who was given very limited US resources, Ret. Gen. Tommy Franks is an ass-covering yes man. Osama's inner-circle just bribed his way out of there. We dropped the ball on that one, plain and simple.

BigBadBrian
03-24-2005, 09:10 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
I guess only cocksuckers can get into the White House nowadays, huh BigBadBlunder?



How noble of you to come to the rescue of your "special friend" there, Nick. ;)

Nickdfresh
03-24-2005, 09:19 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
How noble of you to come to the rescue of your "special friend" there, Nick. ;)

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/misc4.jpg

Nickdfresh
03-25-2005, 11:53 AM
Document suggests bin Laden escaped at Tora Bora
Military brief appears to contradict past Pentagon statements

From Mike Mount
CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/24/pentagon.binladen/index.html)

Thursday, March 24, 2005 Posted: 10:56 PM EST (0356 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A document from the U.S. military appears to contradict the Pentagon's previous statements that it does not know whether al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden escaped U.S. forces at Tora Bora in Afghanistan in December 2001.

The legal document, which summarizes evidence against a terror suspect in U.S. custody at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, states the prisoner "assisted in the escape of Usama Bin Laden from Tora Bora."

There is no date or time frame given.

Originally released after a Freedom of Information Act request by The Associated Press, the document is now on the Pentagon Web site. Who wrote it and what level of information that person had is unclear.

The document is dated December 14, 2004. It is part of what the U.S. military calls Combatant Status Review Boards, a process to determine whether a detainee is an enemy combatant and should continue to be held or if he should be released.

Pentagon officials would not discuss the information in the document and the numerous others released with it, saying the statements were generated from classified information.

Neither the prisoner's name or nationality was disclosed. In the document, he is said to be associated with al Qaeda and the Taliban, and is described as having had bodyguards at one point, indicating he may have been of some importance.

The document also says the detainee was a commander for bin Laden during the Afghan fight against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s, and at some point called for a jihad, or holy war, against the United States.

Other evidence cited against the detainee states the person organized at least one rocket attack against U.S. troops and supported others.

The December 2001 siege of Tora Bora, aimed at killing or capturing bin Laden, has been hotly debated. U.S. military commanders have repeatedly said they didn't know if bin Laden was in the region or if he got away.

At a Pentagon news conference during the 2001 manhunt, Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem told reporters: "I'm not sure how close we ever really have been. We have narrowed it down to an area. Indicators were there, and now indicators are not there. So maybe he still is here, maybe he was killed, or maybe he's left."

The matter surfaced again during the 2004 presidential campaign. (Full story)

Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry repeatedly asserted that President Bush let bin Laden escape by using Afghan forces instead of American troops against al Qaeda in Tora Bora.

In an October 2004 opinion article in The New York Times, Gen. Tommy Franks wrote, "We don't know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden was at Tora Bora in December 2001. Some intelligence sources said he was; others indicated he was in Pakistan at the time."

Franks was the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan at the time.

"Tora Bora was teeming with Taliban and Qaeda operatives ... but Mr. bin Laden was never within our grasp," wrote Franks, who retired in 2003 and backed Bush in the election.

Hardrock69
03-25-2005, 02:09 PM
Well, hey...if Bin Laden was DEAD, then the Bush administration would have no "enemy" to use in their propaganda.

Look, in WWI it was the Germans. In WWII it was the Germans AND the Japanese.

Those were REAL enemies! They were trying to kill us!

In the Cold War, we never were actually at War with the Soviet Union.

Both the Korean conflict and the Vietnam Police Action were creations of the CIA (known as the OSS back in WWII). Korea and Vietnam were planned out before WWII was even over.

After Vietnam, the next real conflict we had was Desert Storm.

And then there is the current thing. However, we might not be in Iraq today if it were not for 9/11.

Look at it this wway...up until now our enemies have been actual COUNTRIES. Our enemy has always been an easily identifiable place, with citizenry and an army.

Now, with TERRORISTS, the US Government has a perfect excuse to wage war on whomever it wants, even the American people (you could say our erosion of civil liberties as a result of this is waging war on Americans in a secondary fashion).

Ok...now TERRORISTS are the enemy. Where are they? Nobody knows!
So let's just wage ware on ANYONE WE WANT! All we have to do is claim they have "ties" :rolleyes: to TERRORISTS, and the Bush administration will have us believe that is a valid excuse to invade any country we want.

We MUST DO THIS, or else the TERRORISTS will get us!

It is like stories that parents tell their kids...."Be good or the Boogeyman will getcha!"

Now, I am not saying there is no real threat from terrorists. And I am not saying that Saddamite Hussein was a nice guy...in fact I do not understand why they have not put a fucking bullet in his fucking head already.

HOWEVER, as long as Osama Bin laden is alive, the US Government will have a never-ending excuse to wage war on whomever the Bush Administration wants.

The articles above are just further proof that Bin Laden is a useful tool for the Bush Administration they use to further their own agenda (whatever that may be...like take away our civil liberties, etc.).

Funny, these motherfuckers are so loudly proclaiming that we need to tighten our border security, yet they REFUSE to seal our border with Mexico.

If they really wanted to do this, they could just hire Mexicans to build a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf Of Mexico, and cut out on all this illegal immigration crap.

THEN, they need to find ALL people who are in the United States illegally, and deport their fucking asses!!!

Yet the Bush Administration refuses to do so.

Oh well.

Back to work.

;)