Bush, Blair and Pope Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Ashcroft
    Veteran
    • Jan 2004
    • 2127

    Bush, Blair and Pope Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

    President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Pope John Paul II are among the 144 individuals and 50 organizations nominated for the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize.

    Today was the deadline for nominations. The winner of the $1.3 million award will be announced in mid-October.

    The prize has lost some of its luster since disastrous ex-president Jimmy Carter was handed it, and some of this year's nominees have a Carteresque flair: French President Jacques Chirac, the European Union and, reportedly, International Solidarity Movement, a pro-Palestinian activist group.

    Others include: Cuban dissident Oswaldo Paya, former Czech President Vaclav Havel, former chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix, International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei, and Israeli technician Mordechai Vanunu, jailed for exposing his country's nuclear weapons program.

    Sen. Richard Lugar and former Sen. Sam Nunn were nominated for their program to dismantle nuclear weapons in Russia.

    Link: My vote's for Bush.
  • ELVIS
    Banned
    • Dec 2003
    • 44120

    #2
    Hans Blix ??

    Comment

    • Pink Spider
      Sniper
      • Jan 2004
      • 867

      #3
      The Pope? Did he kill anyone?

      Bush and Blair being nominated is about as funny as Henry Kissinger winning one.

      Comment

      • FORD
        ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

        • Jan 2004
        • 58759

        #4
        George Orwell is laughing in his grave.
        Eat Us And Smile

        Cenk For America 2024!!

        Justice Democrats


        "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

        Comment

        • Catfish

          #5
          Don't presidents get nominated every year?

          Comment

          • John Ashcroft
            Veteran
            • Jan 2004
            • 2127

            #6
            I guess the modern day Democrat would nominate Saddam rather than Bush.

            Comment

            • Pink Spider
              Sniper
              • Jan 2004
              • 867

              #7
              Looking at the list, he's probably on there anyway.

              Comment

              • Wayne L.

                #8
                Charles Manson could get a Nobel Peace Prize nowadays so it's not a big deal anyway.

                Comment

                • knuckleboner
                  Crazy Ass Mofo
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 2927

                  #9
                  what the fuck would george bush be nominated for a nobel physics prize for?!?

                  (i'm kidding, mr. AG. i actually READ all of this one...)



                  though i think the dig on carter was a bit harsh. though he may have been a "disasterous president." he's been a pretty good EX-president. which, is pretty much why he won the award.

                  Comment

                  • FORD
                    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                    • Jan 2004
                    • 58759

                    #10
                    Originally posted by John Ashcroft
                    I guess the modern day Democrat would nominate Saddam rather than Bush.
                    I would rather a PEACE prize didn't go to a warmonger at all.
                    Eat Us And Smile

                    Cenk For America 2024!!

                    Justice Democrats


                    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                    Comment

                    • John Ashcroft
                      Veteran
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 2127

                      #11
                      Hell, isn't Nobel the one who invented dynamite?

                      And KB, Carter's got good intentions, but what have been the result of those intentions? The committee itself (that picked Carter) said it was more a statement against Bush than a reward for Carter's accomplishments.

                      Comment

                      • Jesus Christ
                        Veteran
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 2428

                        #12
                        Verily, when I come back to this earth and turn the swords into plowshares, I actually thinketh some of you will be disappointed

                        Comment

                        • knuckleboner
                          Crazy Ass Mofo
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 2927

                          #13
                          Originally posted by John Ashcroft
                          Hell, isn't Nobel the one who invented dynamite?

                          And KB, Carter's got good intentions, but what have been the result of those intentions? The committee itself (that picked Carter) said it was more a statement against Bush than a reward for Carter's accomplishments.

                          yep, nobel invented TNT for contruction purposes; making it easier to get tunnels through mountains. he wasn't pleased when it became a weapon, as well. i think that's the reason he started the prize.


                          and as for carter, i thought that it was for his work in monitoring elections around the world. but if the committee also thought it being a slap in bush's face was a factor, then they were wrong. it shouldn't be politicized. (i know, i know. i'm living in a dream world...)

                          Comment

                          Working...