PDA

View Full Version : Short Bus 3 = Hardrock69, FORD, and Keeyth



BigBadBrian
11-06-2005, 08:39 AM
I guess I got your attention also. :D


These three are aka the Tin Foil Beanie Patrol!



Keep those conspiracies coming, fellas! :D

Unchainme
11-06-2005, 08:58 AM
I personally think FORD is probably the most intelligent member on the board.

blueturk
11-06-2005, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
I guess I got your attention also. :D


These three are aka the Tin Foil Beanie Patrol!



Keep those conspiracies coming, fellas! :D

Especially that wacko conspiracy theory about the Bush administration fixing information to justify invading Iraq! That's some crazy shit!:rolleyes:

Warham
11-06-2005, 11:02 AM
I dunno. How do you fix the information that shows Iraq breaking numerous UN resolutions?

blueturk
11-06-2005, 11:05 AM
Originally posted by Warham
I dunno. How do you fix the information that shows Iraq breaking numerous UN resolutions?

As I remember, breaking UN resolutions wasn't the main reason we invaded Iraq.

Warham
11-06-2005, 11:09 AM
'However, in his recent speech before the United Nations, President Bush revealed the real reason we invaded Iraq. He said plainly that the reason we invaded Iraq was "to defend the peace and the credibility of the United Nations."'

Somehow this must have passed me by two years ago. I think I just lost whatever respect I had left for our esteemed President.

Nickdfresh
11-06-2005, 11:45 AM
Originally posted by Warham
'However, in his recent speech before the United Nations, President Bush revealed the real reason we invaded Iraq. He said plainly that the reason we invaded Iraq was "to defend the peace and the credibility of the United Nations."'

Somehow this must have passed me by two years ago. I think I just lost whatever respect I had left for our esteemed President.

Still drinkin' that shit eh WAR?
http://wilsonhellie.typepad.com/for_the_record/pictures/koolaid7.jpg
No, no it wasn't the reason we invaded IRAQ.

The UN largely condemned the invasion done its name as I remember since the War is clearly against international law...

Warham
11-06-2005, 11:46 AM
No, I'm not drinking anything besides Coke.

I've just had an epiphany after reading some online articles.

My days of defending Bush are behind me.

blueturk
11-06-2005, 11:56 AM
Originally posted by Warham
'However, in his recent speech before the United Nations, President Bush revealed the real reason we invaded Iraq. He said plainly that the reason we invaded Iraq was "to defend the peace and the credibility of the United Nations."'



Bush's reasons for invading Iraq read like a multiple choice test....

ODShowtime
11-06-2005, 12:33 PM
Originally posted by Warham
No, I'm not drinking anything besides Coke.

I've just had an epiphany after reading some online articles.

My days of defending Bush are behind me.

What the hell are we gonna do now? That's like Wile E. Coyote saying he's done chasing the RoadRunner!

Seruiously though, I'm glad to hear you're coming over to the dark side. :cool:

Warham
11-06-2005, 12:40 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
What the hell are we gonna do now? That's like Wile E. Coyote saying he's done chasing the RoadRunner!

Seruiously though, I'm glad to hear you're coming over to the dark side. :cool:

I know, I'm even having a hard time trying to figure out what I'm going to do...

ODShowtime
11-06-2005, 12:46 PM
Originally posted by Warham
I know, I'm even having a hard time trying to figure out what I'm going to do...

It's going to be difficult, but we're here for you.

Now that you're turned, see how hard it is to come up with good alternative ideas that could help when you're constantly having to address the latest eye popping stupidity coming from the White House.

If you start off by assuming they're lying cheaters, you will be amazed at what all their news conferences and sound bites really mean in this new context.

It's a beautiful new day!

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 12:48 PM
Originally posted by Warham
I dunno. How do you fix the information that shows Iraq breaking numerous UN resolutions?
Warham,

Shut up with your lies for the U.S. to go to war.

It IS a free country, but you ARE crying fire in a theater. And that's not free speech.

That's "SCOOTER" speech.

And, G-d forbid, if it ever comes t2o it in this country when it's time t2o line 'em up against a wall "and shoot 'em," (do you remember that phrase?) where do you think you'll be? huh

I think I know where you'll be.


:spank:

Warham
11-06-2005, 12:49 PM
It is going to be difficult, but I'm up for new challenges.

ODShowtime
11-06-2005, 12:50 PM
first challenge is to make sense of phil's post

blueturk
11-06-2005, 12:51 PM
Originally posted by Warham
I know, I'm even having a hard time trying to figure out what I'm going to do...

Don't feel lonely. I've met people of all ages and races who feel betrayed by Dubya.

blueturk
11-06-2005, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
first challenge is to make sense of phil's post

A formidable task indeed!

Warham
11-06-2005, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
first challenge is to make sense of phil's post

I can't make sense of Phil's post no matter what side of the aisle I sit on.

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by blueturk
As I remember, breaking UN resolutions wasn't the main reason we invaded Iraq.
How did the UN turn the U.S. into the United Nations army?

When did that happen?

And, when did pre-emptive war become a part of the UN's tool kit to impose it's 'resolutions'?

I recommend that you do not let anyone in the real world ever know your real name in connection with what you write in this forum blog.


:spank:

FORD
11-06-2005, 12:56 PM
Welcome to the Reality Based Community, Warham :)

blueturk
11-06-2005, 12:56 PM
Originally posted by Phil theStalker
How did the UN turn the U.S. into the United Nations army?

When did that happen?

And, when did pre-emptive war become a part of the UN's tool kit to impose it's 'resolutions'?

I recommend that you do not let anyone in the real world ever know your real name in connection with what you write in this forum blog.


:spank:

:confused:

Warham
11-06-2005, 12:58 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Welcome to the Reality Based Community, Warham :)

Thanks FORD.

But just so you know, I don't support either party.

Maybe I should be a libertarian. lol

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:00 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
first challenge is to make sense of phil's post That's right, ODShowtime. You tell him. My posts are deep and alchemic t2o da mmmind.:cool:


:spank:

Warham
11-06-2005, 01:02 PM
Phil wouldn't have it any other way.

FORD
11-06-2005, 01:02 PM
I don't support the Democratic party as a whole right now myself.

Obviously, I support the chairman, and if he prevails, the party might return to the people. Until then, I reserve my support for individual Democrats who live up to the standards of Democratic values and the purpose they were elected for.

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:03 PM
Originally posted by blueturk
:confused:

:spank:

IN OTHER WORDS

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Phil wouldn't have it any other way.
I voted f4or Micheal Peroutka of the Constitution party. He got 36 votes in Cuyahoga county.

Badnarek the Libertarian got 24 votes in the county.

Kerry won the county and the state of Ohio, but...who cares!?


:spank:


LA TIMES
PRESIDENT KERRY!

DLR'sCock
11-06-2005, 01:20 PM
Wow Warham, I am surprised, and I would like to know what these articles were that you read, and your reasoning for not defending the Bush administration anymore.

blueturk
11-06-2005, 01:21 PM
Originally posted by Phil theStalker
:spank:

IN OTHER WORDS

You're a stupid fucking bitch that doesn't even read what she's responding to.

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:30 PM
Originally posted by Warham
No, I'm not drinking anything besides Coke.

I've just had an epiphany after reading some online articles.

My days of defending Bush are behind me.
Tit's funny how I don't believe your Trojan horse tactics t2oday.

I'll see what you're saying t2omorrow.

I want t2o see online THOSE articles.

Those have got t2o be GRATE online articles.


:spank:

Warham
11-06-2005, 01:33 PM
You can believe it, Phil.

I don't have a history here of lying out of both sides of my mouth.

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:36 PM
Originally posted by blueturk
You're a stupid fucking bitch that doesn't even read what she's responding to. I think I just got tit: Warham has changed t2o da otherside and YOU immediately believe his TROLL.

And, he is a he and not a she, right.:confused:


:spank:


SHE/HE WARHAM

Warham
11-06-2005, 01:39 PM
Phil, why so harsh?

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:41 PM
Originally posted by Warham
You can believe it, Phil.

I don't have a history here of lying out of both sides of my mouth. Can I see those online articles that made you 'see the light'?

T2wo questions:

1) Do you have those links saved?

2) Are you a he or a she?


:spank:

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:44 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Phil, why so harsh?
Drinking Coke and taking DMT.

Typical.

Why doo yoo LOVE everyo1ne t2oday? huh


:spank:


AUTO-EROTICISM

Warham
11-06-2005, 01:46 PM
Please delete this thread, FORD.

I think we've gone off the beaten path here. lol

Phil theStalker
11-06-2005, 01:49 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Phil, why so harsh? [/B]TOO MANY CASUALTIES OF WAR THAT YOUR WORDS HAVE HELPED TO PROSECUTE.

HOW DO YOO SLEEP AT NITE?


:spank:

Hardrock69
11-06-2005, 04:18 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Thanks FORD.

But just so you know, I don't support either party.

Maybe I should be a libertarian. lol

I would support the Libertarian Party, but it is useless to do so against the overwhelming majority of the Democrat/Republican stranglehold on our government.


I never was a party individual.

I base my judgements on the individuals concerned.

In this case, Chimp has got to go. I do not care if he was a Libertarian.

He is fucking this country up, and fucking the world up with his foreign policy.


Funny how I post an apology of sorts, and BigBadBrucie just blows it off.

Oh well.

Life goes on....

:rolleyes:

ODShowtime
11-06-2005, 04:26 PM
good times