Republicans And FCC On "Decency" Rampage

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blueturk
    Veteran
    • Jul 2004
    • 1883

    Republicans And FCC On "Decency" Rampage

    Remember the days of TV when somebody's whole family could get murdered or something, and all the victim could call the killers was "creep" or "dirtbag" or some other lame shit?? Those crazy days are coming back! And forget about SEX....

    Channels Fined In Drive To Purge Swearing And Sex

    US BROADCASTERS have been hit by record-breaking fines of almost $4 million (£2.5 million) by a federal TV standards watchdog which decrees that even casual use of the “s-word” or pixelated shots of a woman’s breasts “disturb the peace and quiet of the home”.



    Three years of rulings from the Federal Communications Commission, published in full this week, have alarmed the broadcasters which face competition from largely unregulated cable channels. They may now have to scrap live broadcasts, or return to 1970s-style censorship of scripts.

    For a country which proudly defends its constitutional right to free speech, including the voracious appetite of many Americans for pornography, the watchdog’s decisions might appear surprising.

    But the commission is now chaired by Kevin Martin, a Republican appointed by President Bush to crack down on the indecency that so shocks conservative sensibilities. “The number of complaints received by the commission has risen year after year,” Mr Martin said. “I share the concerns of the public — and of parents, in particular.”

    Between 2002 and 2005 the agency received 300,000 complaints about television shows.

    The commission has ruled that any use of the “f-word”, such as that by Bono during a a Golden Globe Awards ceremony in 2004, is unacceptable. Its report also puts broadcasters on notice that the “s-word” will also be subject to fines if broadcast between 6 and 10pm.

    It decreed that the Fox Television Network had violated decency standards during the 2003 Billboard Music Awards when Nicole Richie asked: “Have you ever tried to get cow shit out of a Prada purse?”

    KCSM-TV in San Mateo, California, was fined $15,000 for the graphic language in Martin Scorsese’s acclaimed documentary on blues music, The Blues: Godfathers and Sons.

    The commission permitted the use of the “f-word” in Tom Hanks’s film Saving Private Ryan, because deleting it “would have altered the nature of the artistic work and diminished the power, realism and immediacy of the experience for viewers”.

    But this was not the case in The Blues — “the purpose of which could have been fulfilled and all viewpoints expressed without the repeated broadcast of expletives”.

    One commissioner, Jonathan Adelstein, dissented. He said: “Coarse language is a part of the culture of the individuals being portrayed. [The ruling] is certain to strike fear in the hearts of news and documentary makers, and broadcasters that air them, which could chill the future expression of constitutionally protected free speech.”

    The biggest fine — $3.6 million — was meted out to CBS, for an episode broadcast by dozens of its stations of the prime-time drama Without a Trace. It featured a “teen orgy” party scene that included at least three shots depicting intercourse.

    The commission also upheld a $550,000 fine against CBS for the infamous “wardrobe malfunction” incident at the Super Bowl 2004 in which Janet Jackson’s clothing was ripped, revealing the singer’s breast.

    More alarming for broadcasters was the $27,500 fine on WBDC for airing an episode of The Surreal Life 2 that included pixelated views of frontal nudity and a shot of a man touching a breast.

    James Baughman, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who has written a history of the commission, said: “I don’t think that the FCC would dare to do this if it didn’t feel there was strong congressional support for this kind of action.”

    BROADCAST FINES

    The Surreal Life: 2 — Pool Party
    WBDC (The WB Network)

    Complaint: Episode features a pool party hosted by porn star Ron Jeremy that “contains approximately 20 pixelated images of nude adults and focuses almost entirely on men and women disrobing, ogling, fondling, kissing and sexually propositioning one another during a pool party”. $27,000 fine

    The Simpsons — Hunka Hunka Burns In Love
    (Fox Television Network)

    Complaint: The episode features Mr Burns and Smithers in a strip club, where female cartoon characters wear underwear and dance around poles. No penalty



  • BITEYOASS
    ROTH ARMY ELITE
    • Jan 2004
    • 6530

    #2
    FCC stands for

    Fuckin
    Cocksucking
    Cunts

    Here's some smilies for that agency!

    Comment

    • vheddyrmv8
      Head Fluffer
      • Mar 2005
      • 213

      #3
      Sometimes I wonder if I'm still living in America...
      http://www.geocities.com/vhcrossingover/talkinshit.jpg

      Comment

      • Satan
        ROTH ARMY ELITE
        • Jan 2004
        • 6664

        #4
        I realize that, as the Devil, anything I have to say on the subject of morality will be taken with more grains of salt than Lot's wife, but here goes?

        The FCC needs to get the FUCK over themselves and realize that normal people use words in normal everyday conversation that don't mean shit in world impact and they really need to get over their goddamned selves.

        or in other words...

        SUCK MY POINTY TAILED ASS, YOU GODDAMNED SHITHEAD FUCKING SONS OF BITCHES!!
        Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

        Originally posted by Sockfucker
        I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

        Comment

        • Cathedral
          ROTH ARMY ELITE
          • Jan 2004
          • 6621

          #5
          On network stations they need to follow the rules.
          On cable and channels you pay axtra for, the choice of content is controlled by the subscriber.

          I have no problem with the FCC finally being forced to do their jobs.
          An "Anything Goes" mentality is bad for society and creates social problems we should be mature enough to avoid.

          This is the problem with liberal lifestyles...

          Comment

          • blueturk
            Veteran
            • Jul 2004
            • 1883

            #6
            Originally posted by Cathedral
            On network stations they need to follow the rules.
            On cable and channels you pay axtra for, the choice of content is controlled by the subscriber.

            I have no problem with the FCC finally being forced to do their jobs.
            An "Anything Goes" mentality is bad for society and creates social problems we should be mature enough to avoid.

            This is the problem with liberal lifestyles...
            Exactly what social problems can be attributed directly to broadcast television content (besides Clay Aiken)? And what exactly is a "liberal lifestyle"?
            Last edited by blueturk; 03-16-2006, 10:53 PM.

            Comment

            • Satan
              ROTH ARMY ELITE
              • Jan 2004
              • 6664

              #7
              FCC censorship is unneccessary. Every TV show carries a rating and every TV manufactured in the last 10 years has the technological ability to block shows on the basis of their ratings, or to lock out an entire channel.

              I'm not saying that the page of a typical TV show script needs to read like the lyric sheet of an NWA album, but just keep it realistic.

              If a guy on some nighttime soap opera comes home and finds his wife in bed fucking the gardner, he's not really going to say "Oh shoot!"

              He's going to say, "Get out of my house you fucking bastard and take the whore with you!"

              That is if the dialogue were realistic. Not gratiutitous, just within the context of the story.
              Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

              Originally posted by Sockfucker
              I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

              Comment

              • Cathedral
                ROTH ARMY ELITE
                • Jan 2004
                • 6621

                #8
                Originally posted by blueturk
                Exactly what social problems can be attributed directly to broadcast television content (besides Clay Aiken)? And what exactly is a "liberal lifestyle"?
                A liberal lifestyle is just exactly what it says, a lifestyle that is liberal.
                The liberal mindset is that any and all things are acceptable, which they aren't according to the scripture.

                As for programming on broadcast television, there is very little thought given to what influences what is shown will have on the youth in this country. It's been irresponsible for many many years, actually.

                In a nutshell it isn't so much the presence of evil, it is the absence of God in our culture that is the problem.
                And the further we get from our founding principles and away from God's principles the further down our society falls into wickedness and degredation.

                Comment

                • blueturk
                  Veteran
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 1883

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Cathedral
                  A liberal lifestyle is just exactly what it says, a lifestyle that is liberal.
                  The liberal mindset is that any and all things are acceptable, which they aren't according to the scripture.

                  As for programming on broadcast television, there is very little thought given to what influences what is shown will have on the youth in this country. It's been irresponsible for many many years, actually.

                  In a nutshell it isn't so much the presence of evil, it is the absence of God in our culture that is the problem.
                  And the further we get from our founding principles and away from God's principles the further down our society falls into wickedness and degredation.
                  I won't ask you why you are a (long-time) member of a site devoted to a guy who obviously enjoys the pleasures of the flesh, and has been known to throw out some choice words from time to time. I'll just give you the definitions of "liberal". Somehow I'm missing the part about wickedness and degradation....


                  broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"
                  having political or social views favoring reform and progress
                  tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
                  a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
                  big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"
                  a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
                  free: not literal; "a loose interpretation of what she had been told"; "a free translation of the poem

                  Comment

                  • Warham
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 14589

                    #10
                    Somebody here asking what a secular liberal lifestyle is?

                    How old are you people anyway?

                    Comment

                    • Cathedral
                      ROTH ARMY ELITE
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 6621

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Satan
                      FCC censorship is unneccessary. Every TV show carries a rating and every TV manufactured in the last 10 years has the technological ability to block shows on the basis of their ratings, or to lock out an entire channel.

                      I'm not saying that the page of a typical TV show script needs to read like the lyric sheet of an NWA album, but just keep it realistic.

                      If a guy on some nighttime soap opera comes home and finds his wife in bed fucking the gardner, he's not really going to say "Oh shoot!"

                      He's going to say, "Get out of my house you fucking bastard and take the whore with you!"

                      That is if the dialogue were realistic. Not gratiutitous, just within the context of the story.
                      Oh, so technology took the place of common decency?
                      Whatever, man, I guarentee that if a day comes where you have a child, that frame of mind will change a little bit....you're a decent guy, so i'm safe in assuming your moral values will indeed change, maybe just a little, but they will somehow.

                      It's like a protection kind of thing that just kicks in.

                      I don't cuss around my kids and i don't stand for strangers doing it around them either.

                      Comment

                      • Cathedral
                        ROTH ARMY ELITE
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 6621

                        #12
                        Originally posted by blueturk
                        I won't ask you why you are a (long-time) member of a site devoted to a guy who obviously enjoys the pleasures of the flesh, and has been known to throw out some choice words from time to time. I'll just give you the definitions of "liberal". Somehow I'm missing the part about wickedness and degradation....


                        broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"
                        having political or social views favoring reform and progress
                        tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
                        a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
                        big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"
                        a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
                        free: not literal; "a loose interpretation of what she had been told"; "a free translation of the poem
                        Damn, that little definition is borderline saying "You're a commie bastard!", lol.

                        The wickedness part is what has become of society due to liberal thinkers. and most of the changes in society took strong hold in the 8 years Clinton was the Prez.
                        Dude, the world i was born into and the world we currently reside in are two completely different places.

                        If you are a bible reader, then you could or should be able to see how we have become more like Sodam and Gomorrah...and you would or should know what happened to that place and why.

                        Comment

                        • blueturk
                          Veteran
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 1883

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Cathedral
                          Damn, that little definition is borderline saying "You're a commie bastard!", lol.

                          The wickedness part is what has become of society due to liberal thinkers. and most of the changes in society took strong hold in the 8 years Clinton was the Prez.
                          Dude, the world i was born into and the world we currently reside in are two completely different places.

                          If you are a bible reader, then you could or should be able to see how we have become more like Sodam and Gomorrah...and you would or should know what happened to that place and why.
                          What were these changes in society that took place during Clinton's term? Do you really think that Dubya is a true Christian that will bring moral values to our Godless country? You're smarter than that, aren't you?

                          Comment

                          • ODShowtime
                            ROCKSTAR

                            • Jun 2004
                            • 5812

                            #14
                            The FCC is waste of time. All the spectrum is allocated, so now fuck off.
                            gnaw on it

                            Comment

                            • Cathedral
                              ROTH ARMY ELITE
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 6621

                              #15
                              Originally posted by blueturk
                              What were these changes in society that took place during Clinton's term? Do you really think that Dubya is a true Christian that will bring moral values to our Godless country? You're smarter than that, aren't you?
                              Just a definate decline in moral standards across the nation during his two terms.

                              Yes i do believe Bush is a christian, but i don't think anyone who calls themselves christians are of God.
                              His actions don't tell me he is of God, and that is what we have to determine who is and who isn't a true child of God.
                              I judge him by his works, and they are empty of the spirit, so he is exactly what he says he is...but he's missing the word "False" in front of the word Christian.

                              I don't consider myself a Christian, I am a sinner, and i believe that the whole concept of "Christianity" is of the Devil.
                              I believe that the bible is the word of God, it is to be taken literally.
                              All the churches and their demoninations are created from the traditions of man, and that is a perversion of God's Word.

                              God is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, so anything that has been added or altered in the Word by man is an abomination.

                              Comment

                              Working...