Impeach Warham

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phil theStalker
    Full Member Status

    • Jan 2004
    • 3804

    Impeach Warham

    Warham has announced dat she...yes, tit is a cunty she-mod...will delete all new threads with da werd impeachment in tit.

    Butt wot aboot Chimpeachment, oral sex, and May Queen? huh

    Tit mmakes mme wonder.

    When will dis horrible tyranny end?

    There's still time t2o change da road yer on, Warhammy.

    Hey, aff Rense.com posts a new article aboot impeachment we're gonna postie tit and talk aboot tit.

    Fakking little twat's on da rag again.

    MOJO RISEN, yoo should have known aboot dis little twat's 'heavy' days bef4ore yoo mmade her a mmod.

    Next time yoo pick mmods mmake them take a PMS test, okay.

    O1ne mmore fak up and Warham gits lit go.


    Add to Ignore list
  • Nickdfresh
    SUPER MODERATOR

    • Oct 2004
    • 49125

    #2
    Moving to feedback. This doesn't belong in the Frontline either...

    Comment

    • Phil theStalker
      Full Member Status

      • Jan 2004
      • 3804

      #3
      Originally posted by Nickdfresh
      Moving to feedback. This doesn't belong in the Frontline either...
      Dat's why I'm not an anal mod.

      Take tit from mme, dude.

      Dis thread belongs in da Front Line.

      Wee have a PMS test f4or yoo, t2oo.


      Add to Ignore list

      Comment

      • Warham
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Mar 2004
        • 14587

        #4
        I dunno, Phil. I don't agree with closing any threads in Frontline, with the exception of threads very poor taste (like the 9/11 cartoon).

        Nick decided to start closing 'dupes' (it wasn't even a duplicate of the other article), so that's what I'm going to do as well.

        Comment

        • Phil theStalker
          Full Member Status

          • Jan 2004
          • 3804

          #5
          Originally posted by Warham
          I dunno, Phil. I don't agree with closing any threads in Frontline, with the exception of threads very poor taste (like the 9/11 cartoon).

          Nick decided to start closing 'dupes' (it wasn't even a duplicate of the other article), so that's what I'm going to do as well.
          Just so yoo know, Warham.

          Yoo can bee cast out.

          Nick, t2oo. I noticed dat (wot u say) Nick locked another hispanic march thread and he wants all hispanic march topics t2o bee in O1NE ANAL THREAD. Daat's stupid!

          Dat thread will bee 64 pages long and yoo won't be able t2o find anything.

          Nick, Nick, nIck, nCik, Nic, da t2opic aff NO COPS at da mmarches, kids leaving schools, peeps leaving their jobs, and NO COPS is a different t2opic than da t2opic aff illegal immigrant legislation.

          And 'legislation' is a different t2opic than da 'illegal vs taxpayer' t2opic t2o bee discussed separately, dude.

          And there are da 'open borders' and 'terrorists crossing illegally' t2opics dat goes along wit da 'illegal' peeps crossing topic.

          Lot's O'topics, o1ne fakking THREAD?!

          Nicky, U want us t2o search a thread wit 188 pages just t2o find and reply t2o da 'taxypayer' topic and da rest aff da topics like dat? huh

          Yer outta yer fakking mmmind.

          Nick's back in town on his stupid pills again wit Forrest Gump.


          Add to Ignore list

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49125

            #6
            Originally posted by Warham
            I dunno, Phil. I don't agree with closing any threads in Frontline, with the exception of threads very poor taste (like the 9/11 cartoon).


            God you are such a blinding hypocrite...

            I guess calling a grieving, albeit mental, Mother "traitorous whore" is in good taste then? BTW, I didn't close it, I dumped it because the very same occurrence has been covered before at the time the article was written! (In JANUARY!!)

            Nick decided to start closing 'dupes' (it wasn't even a duplicate of the other article), so that's what I'm going to do as well.
            No. It's just the same issue from exactly the same perspective. Maybe I can spam the Frontline by posting 300 different articles on say, 9/11...

            Shit, let's just post a separate article for every news event. That way, our bases are covered (and bandwidth is expended).
            Last edited by Nickdfresh; 03-29-2006, 01:59 PM.

            Comment

            • Warham
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Mar 2004
              • 14587

              #7
              When are you going to admit you're wrong, instead of beating around the bush constantly?

              Comment

              • flappo
                Banned
                • Jan 2004
                • 8013

                #8
                phil's hitchworld too , bitch

                just watch your fucking step , pal

                Comment

                • Nickdfresh
                  SUPER MODERATOR

                  • Oct 2004
                  • 49125

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Warham
                  When are you going to admit you're wrong, instead of beating around the bush constantly?
                  Why am I wrong? Because you say so? Typical, no proof, no logic, just "WARHAM has made it so by saying it!"


                  Actually, why don't admit you're a hypocrite and are a selective liar that wants to censor anything that offends him (with a straight face no less)?

                  The 9/11 Tetris-thread should be closed, but the redundant fuck Cindy Sheehan thread(s) is grate and should be reposted six times now?...

                  My God, you're an idiot...

                  Comment

                  • Warham
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 14587

                    #10
                    Originally posted by flappo
                    phil's hitchworld too , bitch

                    just watch your fucking step , pal
                    What's your problem with me, flappo?

                    I don't think I've EVER talked to you here.

                    Comment

                    • Warham
                      DIAMOND STATUS
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 14587

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                      Why am I wrong? Because you say so? Typical, no proof, no logic, just "WARHAM has made it so by saying it!"


                      Actually, why don't admit you're a hypocrite and are a selective liar that wants to censor anything that offends him (with a straight face no less)?

                      The 9/11 Tetris-thread should be closed, but the fuck Cindy Sheehan thread is grate and should be ...

                      My God, you're an idiot...
                      Again, just admit your wrong, and we'll end this.

                      It's quite simple, Nick.

                      Why did you move that thread to the Mod room instead of letting everyone see what you did wrong?

                      Afraid of letting everyone see me busting your balls?

                      Comment

                      • Nickdfresh
                        SUPER MODERATOR

                        • Oct 2004
                        • 49125

                        #12
                        I am not wrong. You are. Why don't admit it?

                        If I see fucking DUPE THREADS on EXACTLY THE SAME ISSUE FROM THE SAME PERSPECTIVE IN TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS --I AM GOING TO CLOSE OR DUMP ONE since I cannot merge them! What don't you understand about that?

                        Comment

                        • Warham
                          DIAMOND STATUS
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 14587

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                          I am not wrong. You are. Why don't admit it?
                          I have nothing to admit to.

                          You closed Brian's thread and moved it to the mod room even though it wasn't a dupe.

                          Plain and simple.

                          You picked on Brian because you don't like him.

                          Comment

                          • Warham
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 14587

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                            I am not wrong. You are. Why don't admit it?

                            If I see fucking DUPE THREADS on EXACTLY THE SAME ISSUE FROM THE SAME PERSPECTIVE IN TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS --I AM GOING TO CLOSE OR DUMP ONE since I cannot merge them! What don't you understand about that?
                            It wasn't a dupe thread. Not the same article, not the same newspaper, not the same author.

                            IT IS NOT A DUPE. P-E-R-I-O-D.

                            But if we are going to play by your rules, then it's going to be a jihad in there.

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49125

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Warham
                              I have nothing to admit to.

                              You closed Brian's thread and moved it to the mod room even though it wasn't a dupe.


                              I closed a second thread that was identitcal, he could have posted that article in that one...

                              Plain and simple.
                              Apparently:















                              You mean dupe threads get closed here? Who knew?


                              You picked on Brian because you don't like him.
                              I "picked" on Brian because he started two virtually identical threads...

                              BTW, Why did you pick on Kentucky Klira?



                              OMG, that would make you a ---hypocrite!!

                              I'm not the one wrong here, I didn't censor anything, I corrected...

                              I'll go down saying that...

                              Fraud.

                              Comment

                              Working...