Who shoud you support for President in 2008?

[FORD]

DISCLAIMER: The guy who posted this link over at Democratic Underground is a notorious DLC shill, so I wouldn't be surprised if the quiz itself is a DLC creation. The lists of candidates, on both Democratic and Republican sides are of course, speculative as there are no declared candidates yet on either side.

That said, it's a harmless way to get a good look at where all the political junkies in this forum are at.

So, take the quiz (http://www.selectsmart.com/plus/select.php?url=08frontrunners) and post your results, just for the Hell of it.

[FORD]

(100%) 1: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D)

(97%) 2: Sen. Russ Feingold (D)

(87%) 3: Gov. Bill Richardson (D)

(86%) 4: Sen. Joseph Biden (D)

(84%) 5: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D)

(84%) 6: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D)

(83%) 7: Sen. John Kerry (D)

(80%) 8: Ex-VP Al Gore (D)

(80%) 9: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D)

(80%) 10: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D)

(71%) 11: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D)

(70%) 12: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D)

(65%) 13: Sen. Evan Bayh (D)


(57%) 14: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R)

(52%) 15: Gov. Mitt Romney (R)

(44%) 16: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R)

(43%) 17: Gov. George Pataki (R)

(40%) 18: Sen. George Allen (R)

(39%) 19: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R)

(36%) 20: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R)

(32%) 21: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R)

(27%) 22: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R)

(26%) 23: Sen. John McCain (R)

(17%) 24: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R)

(10%) 25: Sen. Sam Brownback (R)

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Oh my God - I'M PINK!!! Pink like my asshole pink!!! pink like Lounge Machine pink!!! PINK!!!

1. wesley clark
2. al gore
3. (oh...my...god...) dennis kucinich


My first republican is all the down at #11 and is none other than Mitt Romney (who I like a great deal)...that dickhead Russ Feingold is #4...WEIRD...and I voted for "staying the course" in Iraq and everything...this thing is obviously broken...

[FORD]

Now, as I said, this DLC sponsored poll is likely to skew things toward their candidates whenever possible. Being Liberal as I am, it's no surprise that Kucinich and Feingold would rank high on my list. But Bill "friend of Sean Hannity" Richardson as #3?? Senator Hairplug (D, MBNA) as #4? The man who rigged the Iowa caucus as my #6?? Not bloody likely. Well at least they didn't put Hillary or Bayh in my top 10.

Reality is that out of this speculative list, the only ones I'd realisitically vote for would be Feingold, Edwards, Gore, or Clark. I'd love to see Dennis Kucinich as President, but it's not gonna happen after 8 years of BCE fear programming.

OK, who's next?

[Redballjets88]

i would like to see rudi run against hillary just bc i know hillary would never win...whats your thought on hillary ford id like to hear this

[Dr. Love]

Percent Rank Item
(100%) 1: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(97%) 2: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(96%) 3: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(90%) 4: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(89%) 5: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(89%) 6: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(84%) 7: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(83%) 8: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(83%) 9: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(80%) 10: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(77%) 11: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(77%) 12: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(75%) 13: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(75%) 14: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(75%) 15: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(73%) 16: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(73%) 17: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(71%) 18: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(71%) 19: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(70%) 20: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(67%) 21: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(66%) 22: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information
(64%) 23: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(61%) 24: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(61%) 25: Sen. George Allen (R) Information


12 republican matches
13 democrat matches

Hmmm....

[Redballjets88]

who is that chick in your sig. and where can i find her naked

[FORD]

Originally posted by Redballjets88
i would like to see rudi run against hillary just bc i know hillary would never win...whats your thought on hillary ford id like to hear this

I don't like Hillary at all. Being married to a President is not a qualification for being President anymore than being the son of a President is. And look where that got us.

Hillary can't win. Right wing hate radio has branded her as ultra liberal, which she definitely is NOT. And Liberals will never vote for her because she panders to the militaristic corporatist AIPAC/PNAC right wing.

She would be a worse disaster than Judas IsKerryot.

[Dr. Love]

Originally posted by Redballjets88
who is that chick in your sig. and where can i find her naked

Ask me in a year.

[4moreyears]

Percent Rank Item
(100%) 1: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(99%) 2: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(92%) 3: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(91%) 4: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(89%) 5: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(87%) 6: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(84%) 7: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(83%) 8: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(83%) 9: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information
(79%) 10: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(79%) 11: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(78%) 12: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(77%) 13: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(76%) 14: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(76%) 15: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(64%) 16: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(55%) 17: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(55%) 18: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(52%) 19: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(49%) 20: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(46%) 21: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(43%) 22: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(41%) 23: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(39%) 24: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(29%) 25: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information

[Redballjets88]

Originally posted by Dr. Love
Ask me in a year.

if that is about me being 17 ill be asking you in a few weeks actually

[Dr. Love]

haha

[Nickdfresh]

Your results for Presidential Candidate Selector -- 2008 Front Runners


Percent Rank Item
(100%) 1: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(98%) 2: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(93%) 3: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(90%) 4: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(83%) 5: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(81%) 6: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(81%) 7: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(79%) 8: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(78%) 9: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(75%) 10: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(72%) 11: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(63%) 12: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(62%) 13: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(53%) 14: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(52%) 15: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(44%) 16: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(42%) 17: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(36%) 18: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(31%) 19: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(29%) 20: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(29%) 21: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(24%) 22: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(20%) 23: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(16%) 24: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(14%) 25: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information

Ha! I'm not that Liberal as to support Kucinich, though I do like him...

My results were even more leftist than Ford's were. Uhuhuhuhuhuh!

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Oh my God - I'M PINK!!! Pink like my asshole pink!!! pink like Lounge Machine pink!!! PINK!!!

1. wesley clark
2. al gore
3. (oh...my...god...) dennis kucinich


My first republican is all the down at #11 and is none other than Mitt Romney (who I like a great deal)...that dickhead Russ Feingold is #4...WEIRD...and I voted for "staying the course" in Iraq and everything...this thing is obviously broken...

I knew you were one of us!

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
I knew you were one of us!

Eat My Asshole is no longer here. He's committed hari-Kari in shame and disgust.

Please leave all condolences for his next of kin here...

[LoungeMachine]

LOUNGEMACHINE results for Presidential Candidate Selector -- 2008 Front Runners

Percent Rank Item
(100%) 1: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(99%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(95%) 3: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(94%) 4: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(94%) 5: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(88%) 6: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(84%) 7: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(80%) 8: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(75%) 9: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(72%) 10: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(65%) 11: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(64%) 12: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(60%) 13: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(59%) 14: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(58%) 15: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(57%) 16: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(51%) 17: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(44%) 18: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(41%) 19: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(39%) 20: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(36%) 21: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(32%) 22: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(32%) 23: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(29%) 24: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(23%) 25: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information



It's official

I'm a Liberal Commie Bastard of The Highest Order

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by FORD
Now, as I said, this DLC sponsored poll is likely to skew things toward their candidates whenever possible. Being Liberal as I am, it's no surprise that Kucinich and Feingold would rank high on my list. But Bill "friend of Sean Hannity" Richardson as #3?? Senator Hairplug (D, MBNA) as #4? The man who rigged the Iowa caucus as my #6?? Not bloody likely. Well at least they didn't put Hillary or Bayh in my top 10.

Reality is that out of this speculative list, the only ones I'd realisitically vote for would be Feingold, Edwards, Gore, or Clark. I'd love to see Dennis Kucinich as President, but it's not gonna happen after 8 years of BCE fear programming.

OK, who's next?
I know wot yoo mean about the skew on things by the creators of any poll or ranking system. You can make a poll to promote or say anything you want it to say.

My top thr3ee:

1) Sen. Russ Feingold (D)

2) Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D f4or Dipshit!)

3) Gov. Bill Richardson (D)

...

10) Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Loser

11) Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Loser



:spank:

[DR CHIP]

(100%) 1: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(100%) 2: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(82%) 3: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(79%) 4: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(79%) 5: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(76%) 6: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(76%) 7: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(76%) 8: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(71%) 9: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(69%) 10: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(69%) 11: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(69%) 12: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(69%) 13: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information
(66%) 14: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(58%) 15: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(56%) 16: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(56%) 17: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(56%) 18: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(53%) 19: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(51%) 20: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(48%) 21: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(46%) 22: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(41%) 23: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(41%) 24: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(38%) 25: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information

[PumpedUpMidget]

Had only 2 100%

Mark Warner & Bill Richardson

[Redballjets88]

ok where on the conservative liberal balance would i be if i got allen as my pick

[BITEYOASS]

(100%) 1: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) (98%) 2: Sen. Russ Feingold (D)
(95%) 3: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D)


Fuck, I have Richardson too! Well it's Feingold for President than.

[Little Texan]

100%) 1: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(88%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(85%) 3: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(85%) 4: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(82%) 5: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(82%) 6: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(80%) 7: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(80%) 8: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(80%) 9: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(80%) 10: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(74%) 11: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(74%) 12: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(74%) 13: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(71%) 14: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(71%) 15: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(68%) 16: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(68%) 17: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(68%) 18: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(65%) 19: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(62%) 20: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(62%) 21: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(60%) 22: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information
(57%) 23: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(54%) 24: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information
(51%) 25: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information

[FORD]

OK, that's the strangest Top 10 I've seen yet.

[Little Texan]

I would definitely vote for Newt Gingrich. Dennis Kucinich at #2, now that's scary! :eek:

[FORD]

Originally posted by Redballjets88
ok where on the conservative liberal balance would i be if i got allen as my pick

If the BCE decide to run in 2008, Allen will likely be their puppet candidate. So unless you actually like the way things have gone in this country (and in Iraq), you might want to think about that one.

I didn't see a detailed explanation of how they constructed their polls, but for Senators, the voting record was probably a big part of it.

[Redballjets88]

is allen more moderate or conservative....bc i like to think im pretty moderate

[FORD]

Originally posted by Redballjets88
is allen more moderate or conservative....bc i like to think im pretty moderate

He's of the "Pat Robertson" psychotic wing of the party, if I'm not mistaken. If you're a true moderate Republican, Hagel or Guiliani would be more fitting. I would have also included McCain, if he hadn't spent the last 6 years kissing monkey ass.

Assuming any or all of them actually become candidates, that is.

[Guitar Shark]

Originally posted by FORD
(86%) 4: Sen. Joseph Biden (D)


This is beyond hilarious :D

[FORD]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
This is beyond hilarious :D

Like I said, it's a DLC poll. They always try to make their people look more "liberal" when they're vote shopping among the party base.

But I know what Joe Biden represents, and I find it impossible to believe I would agree with him 86% of the time.

I wish they had included Howard Dean in the poll though. I'd bet a lot of people here would find out they agreed with him a lot. :)

[Warham]

They wanted the poll to have SOME measure of respect...

[ULTRAMAN VH]

1. 100% Newt Gingrich (R)
2. 100% Bill Richardson (D)
3. 90% Mark Warner (D)
4. 89% George Allen (R)
5. 75% George Pataki (R)

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by Little Texan
100%) 1: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(88%) 2: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information


How the >>>> do you go from Gingrinch (and how the .... does Gingrinch get ANYONE'S full support???) to friggin' KUCINISH???

You need therapy dude. And meds. lots of meds...

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by ULTRAMAN VH
1. 100% Newt Gingrich (R)
2. 100% Bill Richardson (D)
3. 90% Mark Warner (D)
4. 89% George Allen (R)
5. 75% George Pataki (R)

Great. Another schizo.

[ULTRAMAN VH]

Hey, I took the survey and that is what it coughed up. Guess I am a Centrist/Independant. I really don't care for either party. Both have made it real clear that they don't give a fuck about the middle class, other than draining us dry to pay for the war, Illegal Aliens and welfare.

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by FORD
I don't like Hillary at all. Being married to a President is not a qualification for being President anymore than being the son of a President is. And look where that got us.

Hillary can't win. Right wing hate radio has branded her as ultra liberal, which she definitely is NOT. And Liberals will never vote for her because she panders to the militaristic corporatist AIPAC/PNAC right wing.

She would be a worse disaster than Judas IsKerryot.
She will run f4or her party's nomination only t2o come in second t2o Edwards, then Edwards will pick Hillary as his VP.

true dat

If anything should happen t2o JFK...er...Eddie, Hillary is in.

If nothing should happen t2o Edwards and he gets a second term, Hillary could win her party's nom' in 2016, but she'll lose a Presidential bid due t2o her age (she's no Ronnie), and repukes will return t2o the White House.

I'm pretty sure you'll see sometime after the next Pres. term (2012) it's going t2o all be over except f4or the fat lady singing, and there won't be a U.S. President, in the form the U.S. is t2oday, in 2016 and beyond.

Let the goodtimes roll.


:spank:

[Redballjets88]

i really dont like the way its set up though, bc my opinions go way deeper than suport oppose and neither

[bueno bob]

Looks like I'm a Dennis Kucinich man...

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by bueno bob
Looks like I'm a Dennis Kucinich man...

That's an oxymoron. You can't be for Dennis Kucinich and still be a "man".

[Warham]

John Edwards? LMAO!

Phil, you havent' lost a step.

[FORD]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Great. Another schizo.

Not really. Richardson's a regular FAUX News "guest" and Warner's the DLC's new posterboy. Neither are real Democrats.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Redballjets88
i really dont like the way its set up though, bc my opinions go way deeper than suport oppose and neither

This is true. I picked "neither" on a couple of questions, not because I didn't have an opinion on the issue, but because their two options sucked. But this is typical of the DLC, who usually offer you the choice of Republican, or Republican posing as Democrat.

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by FORD
Not really. Richardson's a regular FAUX News "guest" and Warner's the DLC's new posterboy. Neither are real Democrats.

But to wind up with he and Gingrinch tied at 100%. that's crazy.

btw, I do believe that Kerry could have won in 2004 if someone like richardson was his running mate. say what you will, it owuld have diversified the ticket and, need I remind you, it's not like the dems won carolina with edwards on the ticket...

[Warham]

Why would the Democratic Underground have any kind of DLC poll? Makes no sense.

[Redballjets88]

Originally posted by FORD
This is true. I picked "neither" on a couple of questions, not because I didn't have an opinion on the issue, but because their two options sucked. But this is typical of the DLC, who usually offer you the choice of Republican, or Republican posing as Democrat.

i picked neither on like 5 just bc it was way too vague, so i think my results are pretty fucked up

[bueno bob]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
That's an oxymoron. You can't be for Dennis Kucinich and still be a "man".

Well, I didn't necessarily say I was going to vote for him, either...

I'm as of yet undecided.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Warham
Why would the Democratic Underground have any kind of DLC poll? Makes no sense.

The poll itself isn't on DU, but a DLC employee who posts at DU is the one who linked it there. And he never does anything but push the company line, so to speak.

The DLC has taken over that place, which is why I'm no longer a participating member.

It started with the IsKerryot campaign, and got even worse after that stolen election.

There are people there who literally sit on the board all day just waiting to attack anyone who dares disagree with a single DLC policy or candidate. They have to be interns or paid employees.

Hell, if the real Democratic party paid people to repsond to the BCE like that, I'd be e-mailing my resume to Howard Dean right now.

[Redballjets88]

why isnt dean running? is it bc like 70% of america thinks he's a joke? no offence just a hypothesis

[Warham]

Dean promised not to run when he took that demotion.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Warham
Dean promised not to run when he took that demotion.

By calling it a "demotion", you are admitting that he definitely would have won in 2008. And probably would have had a Diebold-proof landslide against the Chimp as well.

That's what you mean, right?

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by Warham
Dean promised not to run when he took that demotion.

hardly a demotion.

[Warham]

Originally posted by FORD
By calling it a "demotion", you are admitting that he definitely would have won in 2008. And probably would have had a Diebold-proof landslide against the Chimp as well.

That's what you mean, right?

No, I meant that a big-time contender for a nomination is of a higher position than the chairman for that particular party.

Nobody will remember Terry McAwful in ten years, but people still will remember Howard Dean for his scream in twenty years.

Even though I think Howard has or had no chance to ever win a general election, I've always believed he had a chance to win the DNC nomination.

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by Warham
I've always believed he had a chance to win the DNC nomination.

Which is why the repulicans ran ads agianst him during the democrats primaries...

[FORD]

Originally posted by Warham
No, I meant that a big-time contender for a nomination is of a higher position than the chairman for that particular party.

Nobody will remember Terry McAwful in ten years, but people still will remember Howard Dean for his scream in twenty years.

Even though I think Howard has or had no chance to ever win a general election, I've always believed he had a chance to win the DNC nomination.

They won't remember Terry McUseless, because the guy didn't do anything but sit behind a desk and watch the corporate checks roll in.

Howard Dean, on the other hand, is taking an active role in rebuilding the party structure on the local level in all 50 states. He's carried over his ability from his own campaign to raise money from the people when neccessary. And he's publicly identified election fraud as a real issue, being himself the only person who ever hacked a simulated Diebold tabulator database on live TV. (which was unfortuantely on a little known CNBC show, so it wasn't probably seen by anyone other than Dean supporters. But the video has made its rounds in cyberspace)

If all this work pays off in 2006 and 2008, Howard Dean will definitely be remembered far more that McUseless or most of his predecessors.

[Ally_Kat]

(100%) 1: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R)
(94%) 2: Sen. George Allen (R)
(94%) 3: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R)
(88%) 4: Sen. Sam Brownback (R)
(85%) 5: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R)
(70%) 6: Gov. George Pataki (R)
(70%) 7: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R)
(67%) 8: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R)
(67%) 9: Gov. Mitt Romney (R)
(64%) 10: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R)
(61%) 11: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R)
(58%) 12: Sen. John McCain (R)
(55%) 13: Gov. Bill Richardson (D)
(50%) 14: Sen. Evan Bayh (D)
(47%) 15: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D)
(41%) 16: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D)
(35%) 17: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D)
(35%) 18: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D)
(35%) 19: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D)
(23%) 20: Sen. Russ Feingold (D)
(20%) 21: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D)
(20%) 22: Sen. Joseph Biden (D)
(17%) 23: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D)
(14%) 24: Ex-VP Al Gore (D)
(8%) 25: Sen. John Kerry (D)

Who's Tom Tancredo and should I be afraid that he's on top of my list? I read about Allen before and that worries me because I do not consider myself part of the Pat Robertson crowd.

I didn't like it too much because if I wanted to put down tha I wanted to decrease spending, it was with the raise taxes option, which is not part of my view. I think there should have been 4 options with the 5th as neither.

[Warham]

George Allen isn't part of the Pat Robertson crowd.

Somebody's blowing air up your skirt.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Ally_Kat


Who's Tom Tancredo and should I be afraid that he's on top of my list?

Yes you should be afraid! Tancredo is a racist asshole :(

I read about Allen before and that worries me because I do not consider myself part of the Pat Robertson crowd.

He is. Don't listen to Warham ;)

I didn't like it too much because if I wanted to put down tha I wanted to decrease spending, it was with the raise taxes option, which is not part of my view. I think there should have been 4 options with the 5th as neither.

Yeah, the poll definitely has it's flaws. But as I said before, I suspect that was intentional. The DLC likes to confuse people. It makes their triangulation crap seem more viable that way.

[Guitar Shark]

LOL. What a ridiculous poll. These results don't even come close to showing who I'd vote for. Kucinich? Give me a break. Where are the questions on "viability" or "electability" of the candidates? I would, however, like to learn more about Feingold.

(100%) 1: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) Information
(95%) 2: Sen. Russ Feingold (D) Information
(86%) 3: Ex-Gen. Wesley Clark (D) Information
(83%) 4: Sen. John Kerry (D) Information
(82%) 5: Sen. Joseph Biden (D) Information
(80%) 6: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(79%) 7: Ex-Sen. John Edwards (D) Information
(79%) 8: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) Information
(74%) 9: Gov. Tom Vilsack (D) Information
(68%) 10: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(68%) 11: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(62%) 12: Sen. Evan Bayh (D) Information
(59%) 13: Ex-Gov. Mark Warner (D) Information
(54%) 14: Gov. Mitt Romney (R) Information
(51%) 15: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) Information
(51%) 16: Gov. George Pataki (R) Information
(45%) 17: Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) Information
(35%) 18: Ex-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R) Information
(31%) 19: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(31%) 20: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R) Information
(29%) 21: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) Information
(23%) 22: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(21%) 23: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(21%) 24: Sen. Sam Brownback (R) Information
(17%) 25: Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) Information

[Warham]

All your favorites are there, Sharkie.

Such wonderboys like John Kerry, Joe Biden and Al Gore, all yours for the voting.

[Guitar Shark]

Sigh. It's not looking good for the Dems.

[Warham]

I love watching the liberals get all excited over '06 and '08 thinking that the Democrats are going to sweep both Houses and win back the White House with no resistance whatsoever.

[Mr Grimsdale]

VOTE GRIMSDALE!

[FORD]

Originally posted by Warham
I love watching the liberals get all excited over '06 and '08 thinking that the Democrats are going to sweep both Houses and win back the White House with no resistance whatsoever.

Why would anybody in their right mind vote for the party of Tom DeLay, Duke Cunningham, Jack 'Off, Scooter Libby, Catkiller Frist, George Chimp Jr, Dick Cheney, etc.?

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Warham
I love watching the liberals get all excited over '06 and '08 thinking that the Democrats are going to sweep both Houses and win back the White House with no resistance whatsoever.


Yet another baseless claim of your's I'd love to see you back up with a fact or two...:rolleyes:


Who and when did ANYONE in here EVER say we'd win back the house, senate, or oral office WITHOUT RESISTANCE WHATSOEVER:rolleyes:


What a patently ridiculous post.

We WILL gain seats in both houses, and probably the WH, but not without major battles and heavy casulties.

Why do you make these ridiculous claims, and then get ALL PISSED OFF when people read into YOUR vague one-liners????

Give it a rest.

So, please post a link where ANYONE posted what you claim.

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by FORD
Why would anybody in their right mind vote for the party of Tom DeLay, Duke Cunningham, Jack 'Off, Scooter Libby, Catkiller Frist, George Chimp Jr, Dick Cheney, etc.?

Because those guys stand for something! True American values!

Hey, what have you got against a scientist/surgeon/medical doctor experimenting on cats? Plenty - nearly ALL - do it.

Few make head up the ass diagnoses on the senate floor...

[LoungeMachine]

Why is FORD talking to himself?

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by FORD
Why would anybody in their right mind vote for the party of Tom DeLay, Duke Cunningham, Jack 'Off, Scooter Libby, Catkiller Frist, George Chimp Jr, Dick Cheney, etc.?

Didn't we have this conversation 18 months ago?

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine

not without major battles and heavy casulties.


What the fuck is a "casulty"?

If "your" going to play grammar police, "your" going to have to lead by example and improve "you're" own, bud...

He who laughs last... :)

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Didn't we have this conversation 18 months ago?

Yeah, but I was posting as FORD at the time, not under this screen name...

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by Mr Grimsdale
VOTE GRIMSDALE!
Why wood anyo1ne vote f4or you when tit takes yoo an hour t2o put on yer MAKE-UP?! huh


:spank:

[LoungeMachine]

casualties.......

But don't cuntfuse spelling errors with grammatical errors, you little bunghole muncher....


And have a Certs now and then, will ya? Tic Tac at least....

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine

And have a Certs now and then, will ya? Tic Tac at least....

Women consider my breath to be a fragrant pheromone...

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Yeah, but I was posting as FORD at the time, not under this screen name...

Tell us oh, Alias.....

What does FORD stand for?

No, it's not Fucked Over Redundant Democrat either.....:rolleyes:

or Found On Road Dead.......

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Tell us oh, Alias.....

What does FORD stand for?



"Fat Obese Rotund Diabetic"

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Tell us oh, Alias.....

What does FORD stand for?

No, it's not Fucked Over Redundant Democrat either.....:rolleyes:

or Found On Road Dead.......
I'd just like dis MERRY-GOO-ROOND t2o CEASE!


:spank:

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Phil,

I've said it once, I;'ve said it a thousand times.

Stop being a pussy.

Sincerely,

FORD

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Yet another baseless claim of your's I'd love to see you back up with a fact or two...:rolleyes:


Who and when did ANYONE in here EVER say we'd win back the house, senate, or oral office WITHOUT RESISTANCE WHATSOEVER:rolleyes:


What a patently ridiculous post.

We WILL gain seats in both houses, and probably the WH, but not without major battles and heavy casulties.

Why do you make these ridiculous claims, and then get ALL PISSED OFF when people read into YOUR vague one-liners????

Give it a rest.

So, please post a link where ANYONE posted what you claim.

I see some cracks in the facade.

Not confident enough?

[Nickdfresh]

But how's it looking for the Republicans?

[Warham]

It looks rough right now, but there's still six months until November, and Americans have short attention spans. Anything can happen.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Warham
I see some cracks in the facade.

Not confident enough?

Way to duck and totally avoid the DIRECT request for you to just once back up your stupid claims with a fact or two:rolleyes:


Trying to turn it around as usual.

Not confident enough in your posts?


ass nob:rolleyes:

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
But how's it looking for the Republicans?

In a word?

Indictment
Subpeona
Scandal
Lying
Conviction
Resignation


More to follow.....

[Warham]

I'm confident that liberals here have proclaimed that 2006 and 2008 have been gift-wrapped and ready for the taking, yes.

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
In a word?

Indictment
Subpeona
Scandal
Lying
Conviction
Resignation


More to follow.....

Was that before or after Bush took over in the White House? I can't recall...

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Warham
I love watching the liberals get all excited over '06 and '08 thinking that the Democrats are going to sweep both Houses and win back the White House with no resistance whatsoever.

Again......

WHO or WHEN did ANYONE ever say this? "We will sweep both houses and the White House with no resistance whatsoever"

Or is it just more Neo Con Hyperbole, AKA "The truth is what we say it is" bullshit......

Just admit it. You just make shit up to post it. You never seem to back it up.

:rolleyes:

[EAT MY ASSHOLE]

Pat Robertson for Emperor!

[LoungeMachine]

18 hours later and no response from Warpig.

Imagine my surprise.

This is the third straight time you've made these dumbass claims, and then pussied out in backing them up with an inkling of FACTS.

Typical.

Lying about fellow posters, and what they've posted in here seems to be your MO, hammy.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Pat Robertson for Emperor!


STFU

[Guitar Shark]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
18 hours later and no response from Warpig.

Imagine my surprise.

This is the third straight time you've made these dumbass claims, and then pussied out in backing them up with an inkling of FACTS.

Typical.

Lying about fellow posters, and what they've posted in here seems to be your MO, hammy.

C'mon Lounge, cut the poor guy a break on his birthday at least. ;)

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Warham
It looks rough right now, but there's still six months until November, and Americans have short attention spans. Anything can happen.

Yeah. Hopefully they'll forgot that the Republicans have become shitty at governing, overly partisan, and corrupt over the years...

Looks like it's about time for another terror attack...

[FORD]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Yeah. Hopefully they'll forgot that the Republicans have become shitty at governing, overly partisan, and corrupt over the years...

Looks like it's about time for another terror attack...

Followed by another illegal invasion :(

Let's hope the people aren't so blind and stupid this time.

[LoungeMachine]

Remember, just like Warhamster......you CANNOT believe a word that comes out of THE DECIDER'S mouth.

He thinks God is telling him to Nuke Iran.

"I'm the decider"

[LoungeMachine]

And if we do actually use a "tactical nuke" :rolleyes: on Iran, we've basically told the world it's open season.......

[Warham]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Looks like it's about time for another terror attack...

:rolleyes:

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
18 hours later and no response from Warpig.

Imagine my surprise.

This is the third straight time you've made these dumbass claims, and then pussied out in backing them up with an inkling of FACTS.

Typical.

Lying about fellow posters, and what they've posted in here seems to be your MO, hammy.

Yeah, I didn't spend all my time here yesterday, on my birthday of all days.

Sorry if I disappointed you, Lounge.

I'll try harder next year.

[LoungeMachine]

So back up your claim, or admit it was a lie...

Whichever is easier for you :rolleyes: