Howard Dean

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 4moreyears
    Commando
    • Oct 2004
    • 1245

    Howard Dean

    What a moron
  • ELVIS
    Banned
    • Dec 2003
    • 44120

    #2
    But the platform does not define marriage that way, and his remarks prompted the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force to return a $5,000 donation from the Democratic National Committee.
    The Lord works in mysterious ways...

    Comment

    • BigBadBrian
      TOASTMASTER GENERAL
      • Jan 2004
      • 10625

      #3
      "Marriage is between a man and a woman" - Howard Dean

      “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

      Comment

      • blueturk
        Veteran
        • Jul 2004
        • 1883

        #4
        Be careful when you define the definition of "moron"...

        "... I was worried that activist judges are actually defining the definition of marriage. And the surest way to protect marriage between a man and woman is to amend the Constitution."

        George W. Bush--Third Presidential Debate, Tempe, AZ, October 13, 2004

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 58787

          #5
          Originally posted by BigBadBrian
          "Marriage is between a man and a woman" - Howard Dean

          Which is absolutely consistent with the position he had as governor of Vermont when he signed the civil unions law.
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • diamondD
            Veteran
            • Jan 2004
            • 1962

            #6
            I thought you didn't agree with that position tho?
            Meet us in the future, not the pasture

            Comment

            • FORD
              ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

              • Jan 2004
              • 58787

              #7
              Originally posted by diamondD
              I thought you didn't agree with that position tho?
              My position has always been that committed gay couples are entitled under the 14th ammendment to all the same legal rights as a married heterosexual couple. Calling it a "civil union" makes sense, because then the question of "marriage" as a religious ceremony is taken completely off the table.

              The supreme court in Vermont came to the same conclusion that the Massachussettes court did. Dean signed the civil unions bill as a common sense solution to settle the debate.
              Eat Us And Smile

              Cenk For America 2024!!

              Justice Democrats


              "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

              Comment

              • ELVIS
                Banned
                • Dec 2003
                • 44120

                #8
                I hope you're not reducing marriage to a "religious ceremony"...

                Comment

                • FORD
                  ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                  • Jan 2004
                  • 58787

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ELVIS
                  I hope you're not reducing marriage to a "religious ceremony"...
                  Depends on who you ask......

                  What does the word "marriage" mean?

                  Is it a piece of paper, a religious ceremony, or a lifetime committment between two people who love each other.

                  The piece of paper is legal. So there's no basis other than blatant discrimination to exclude gay couples from that.

                  Nor can anybody make a rational argument against a gay couple being in a committed relationship, sharing financial resources, property, insurance policies, etc.

                  Some religious denominations may have objections to performing gay ceremonies. And they should have that right to object, but they should NOT have the right to force that belief into the laws that apply to everyone.

                  So again, the best thing to do is establish the legal equality, and leave the ceremonial details to for the religious denominations to argue amongst themselves. In the end, some will do the ceremonies and others won't. Chances are the ones that won't don't have a lot of gay members in their congregations anyway.
                  Eat Us And Smile

                  Cenk For America 2024!!

                  Justice Democrats


                  "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                  Comment

                  • Warham
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 14589

                    #10
                    Howard Dean's a crook just like every other politician.

                    He's probably got quite a few skeletons in his closet...probably a few from his pre-med days.

                    Comment

                    • 4moreyears
                      Commando
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 1245

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Warham
                      Howard Dean's a crook just like every other politician.

                      He's probably got quite a few skeletons in his closet...probably a few from his pre-med days.
                      He did not inhale!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...