PDA

View Full Version : Third in line



jacksmar
01-04-2007, 03:35 PM
There's always room to lie at her feet.

# Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
# Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
# Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
# Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
# Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
# Voted NO on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
# Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
# Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
# Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
# Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)

# Voted NO on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005)
# Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
# Voted NO on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
# Voted NO on constitutional amendment prohibiting flag desecration. (Jun 2003)
# Voted NO on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)
# Voted NO on ending preferential treatment by race in college admissions. (May 1998)
# Constitutional Amendment for equal rights by gender. (Mar 2001)
# Rated 87% by the ACLU, indicating a pro-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
* Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun 2000)
* Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999)
* Voted YES on maintaining right of habeus corpus in Death Penalty Appeals. (Mar 1996)
* Voted NO on making federal death penalty appeals harder. (Feb 1995)
* Voted YES on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment. (Apr 1994)
* Rated 88% by CURE, indicating pro-rehabilitation crime votes. (Dec 2000)
* Moratorium on death penalty; more DNA testing. (Mar 2001)
* More funding and stricter sentencing for hate crimes. (Apr 2001)
* Require DNA testing for all federal executions. (Mar 2001)
* Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
* Voted NO on prohibiting needle exchange & medical marijuana in DC. (Oct 1999)
* Voted NO on subjecting federal employees to random drug tests. (Sep 1998)
* Legalize medical marijuana. (Jul 2001)
# Voted YES on $84 million in grants for Black and Hispanic colleges. (Mar 2006)
# Voted NO on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror. (Nov 2001)
# Voted YES on requiring states to test students. (May 2001)
# Voted NO on allowing vouchers in DC schools. (Aug 1998)
# Voted NO on vouchers for private & parochial schools. (Nov 1997)
# Reduce class size to 18 children in grades 1 to 3. (Mar 2001)
# Opposes requiring schools to allow school prayer. (Jan 2001)
# Voted NO on scheduling permitting for new oil refinieries. (Jun 2006)
# Voted NO on authorizing construction of new oil refineries. (Oct 2005)
# Voted NO on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy. (Jun 2004)
# Voted NO on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy. (Nov 2003)
# Voted YES on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)
# Voted YES on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
# Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol. (Jun 2000)
* Voted YES on establishing nationwide AMBER alert system for missing kids. (Apr 2003)
* Voted NO on reducing Marriage Tax by $399B over 10 years. (Mar 2001)
* Rated 8% by the Christian Coalition: an anti-family voting record. (Dec 2003)
* Supported funding child care, child health, & child housing. (Jul 1999)
# Avoid go-it-alone foreign policy. (Jan 2004)
# Avoid go-it-alone foreign policy. (Jan 2004)
# Voted YES on deterring foreign arms transfers to China. (Jul 2005)
# Voted YES on keeping Cuba travel ban until political prisoners released. (Jul 2001)
# Voted NO on withholding $244M in UN Back Payments until US seat restored. (May 2001)
# Voted YES on $156M to IMF for 3rd-world debt reduction. (Jul 2000)
# Voted NO on Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China. (May 2000)
# Voted YES on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)
* Voted NO on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers. (Oct 2005)
* Voted NO on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse. (Apr 2003)
* Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
* Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/nancy_pelosi.jpg

Diamondjimi
01-04-2007, 06:17 PM
Originally posted by jacksmar
There's always room to lie at her feet.

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/nancy_pelosi.jpg

Egad ! Is that Tawney Kitaen ?:eek:

blonddgirl777
01-04-2007, 06:26 PM
Originally posted by diamondjimi
Egad ! Is that Tawney Kitaen ?:eek:

L.O.L.
Holly shit!, it's the NutCracker!
(Look at those lips)! :eek:

FORD
01-04-2007, 09:37 PM
Looks like a solid voting record to me. But I think this thread deserves a better picture of the Speaker of the House.....



http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/getty/72907578aw009_nancy_pelosi_.rp420x400.jpg

ODShowtime
01-04-2007, 10:13 PM
Originally posted by jacksmar
There's always room to lie at her feet.

# Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
# Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
# Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
# Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
# Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
# Voted NO on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
# Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
# Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
# Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
# Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)

# Voted NO on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005)
# Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)



Tough tits for you jack-ass.

All of these were the right decision. You're ignorant.

blonddgirl777
01-04-2007, 10:19 PM
Originally posted by FORD
... a better picture of the Speaker of the House...

In deed...

sadaist
01-04-2007, 10:37 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
Tough tits for you jack-ass.

All of these were the right decision. You're ignorant.

Yes. Allowing partial birth abortions is a terrific thing. We should all be so lucky to witness a skull caved in and brains vacuumed out.

http://www.lifeissues.org/images/PBA.jpg

FORD
01-04-2007, 10:45 PM
Originally posted by sadaist
Yes. Allowing partial birth abortions is a terrific thing. We should all be so lucky to witness a skull caved in and brains vacuumed out.



Rumor is that Barbara Bush had a partial birth abortion in 1946.

Unfortunately, it survived........

http://www.ihr.org/webpics/bush_moron.jpg

blonddgirl777
01-04-2007, 11:03 PM
Originally posted by sadaist
...http://www.lifeissues.org/images/PBA.jpg

O.K., I am pro-choice but these pics. are very disturbing...
:confused:

I mean, what is a woman supposed to do, when carrying a dead baby?

:confused: :(

blonddgirl777
01-04-2007, 11:07 PM
Originally posted by FORD
... Unfortunately, it survived........

http://www.ihr.org/webpics/bush_moron.jpg

Now, THIS is eaven more disturbing! :eek:

sadaist
01-05-2007, 04:28 AM
Originally posted by blonddgirl777
O.K., I am pro-choice but these pics. are very disturbing...
:confused:

I mean, what is a woman supposed to do, when carrying a dead baby?

:confused: :(

I'm pro-choice as well. Except where women use abortion as birth control. I think there should be a limit. I've heard of girls who have had multiple abortions (3, 4, 5), all due to sleeping around and getting knocked up.

The partial birth IS disturbing. If the doctor said that or my wife would die, I'd agree to it in a second. But there are too many cases where it isn't necessary. And if the woman was carrying a "dead baby", there would be no need to suck it's brains out.

Just because we have the right to do something, doesn't mean we should abuse that right.

ODShowtime
01-05-2007, 08:17 AM
Originally posted by sadaist
Yes. Allowing partial birth abortions is a terrific thing. We should all be so lucky to witness a skull caved in and brains vacuumed out.


You're ignorant too. NEXT

ODShowtime
01-05-2007, 08:19 AM
Originally posted by sadaist
Just because we have the right to do something, doesn't mean we should abuse that right.

tell that to all your corrupt republican buddies!

NO ONE who supports the republican party NOW can claim a moral high ground around here. Forget about it. It's not happening on my watch.

blonddgirl777
01-05-2007, 08:55 AM
Originally posted by sadaist
I'm pro-choice as well. Except where women use abortion as birth control. I think there should be a limit. I've heard of girls who have had multiple abortions (3, 4, 5), all due to sleeping around and getting knocked up...

That is due to ignorance and negligence...

Not every contraceptives is compatible with every women... How many times have I heard guys complaining about wearing condoms... and at the same time, feeling "traped" when she wants to keep the baby!

And some idiots look at me funny, when I say that women that don't use contraceptives should FORCE the guys to wear condoms... if they want sex! (Not to mention S.T.D.'s)...
Jeez... in the heat of the moment, he WILL put that raincoat... instead of walking away blue balled! :rolleyes:

Sex education is the key and the Republicans where "fighting" against it when I lived in the States (1992-2000).

I will never forget; this Republican family I met in Arizona... they had pictures of John Wayne and Jesus everywhere, gun racks and every weapons that could be found, "wisdom" thouths written everywhere etc... in their house. You see the picture...

The Mom. and Dad. had this argument with me... they claimed that educating teenagers on contraceptive (in school and at home), was to allow and encourage them to have sex before Marriage :eek:, therefore... a bad sin, only committed by careless Liberals like me... and blah, blah, blah... :o

Well... a couple months after I've met them, their teenage daughter got pregnant. She couldn't talk about it to anyone (especially not her family) so she turned to my friend who was related to them and lived with me in California...

My friend had to fly her in Oakland and help her through the abortion process... There was no way she could have kept that baby and stay in that family... she was literally fucked! All I wanted was to call the parents and give them shit... for thinking they where above reality...

When I hear those Reps. fighting for their rights to keep everybody ignorant, it makes me rage... they are responsable for a lot of abortions that could have been avoided... such retards! :rolleyes:

PlexiBrown
01-05-2007, 09:16 AM
I would rather just get a blow job from a chick. You stick your dick in a vagina and there is just way too much that can go wrong.

sadaist
01-05-2007, 06:41 PM
Originally posted by FORD
But I think this thread deserves a better picture of the Speaker of the House.....



Yet you still post the absolute worst pictures of the President that you can find.

blonddgirl777
01-05-2007, 06:48 PM
Originally posted by sadaist
Yet you still post the absolute worst pictures of the President that you can find.

"The worst"?...
That's just his own natural self!

FORD
01-05-2007, 06:50 PM
Originally posted by sadaist
Yet you still post the absolute worst pictures of the President that you can find.

There aren't any "good" pictures of the Chimp. He looks dumb in every picture, because he IS.

blonddgirl777
01-05-2007, 06:59 PM
Originally posted by FORD
There aren't any "good" pictures of the Chimp...

And that's his better angle... videos don't work very well for him...

ODShowtime
01-05-2007, 07:01 PM
Originally posted by blonddgirl777 ]All I wanted was to call the parents and give them shit... for thinking they where above reality...

When I hear those Reps. fighting for their rights to keep everybody ignorant, it makes me rage... they are responsable for a lot of abortions that could have been avoided... such retards! :rolleyes:

very well put.

Nickdfresh
01-07-2007, 05:27 PM
Originally posted by sadaist
Yes. Allowing partial birth abortions is a terrific thing. We should all be so lucky to witness a skull caved in and brains vacuumed out.

http://www.lifeissues.org/images/PBA.jpg

When you get a clue, you'll learn that this procedure was performed rarely, and almost always to protect the life of the mother...

blonddgirl777
01-07-2007, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
When you get a clue, you'll learn that this procedure was performed rarely, and almost always to protect the life of the mother...

I noticed that a lot of Republicans are against those issues that protect and help women in general;
the pill available for everyone, abortion, wellfare, child support, daycare etc...

FORD
01-07-2007, 09:48 PM
Republicans are against issues that help and protect ANYONE or ANYTHING.

Except corporations and billionaires.

blonddgirl777
01-07-2007, 10:13 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Republicans are against issues that help and protect ANYONE or ANYTHING....

The popular saying here is; "Why don't they spend money helping their own, rather than to go on killing others"?

Once we see a Democrat reversing the "machine"... the overall attitude of Canadians towards Americans shall change... for better.

Nitro Express
01-07-2007, 10:21 PM
I used to think the Republicans were for individualism and the Democrats wanted everyone under their socialist thumb.

I broke with the Republican Party when I found out their fundraising call center had been outsourced to India. I'm not kidding here. It is so apparent that the Bush Administration took their voter base for granted and abused the votes of people who were duped by their lies.

What do most politicians want? What happened in New Orleans. Thousands of people sitting there waiting for help and doing nothing on their own initiative on their own. The minority walked over the bridge or rowed across the river on their own. One guy walked all the way to Baton Rouge on foot. The majority sat there and did nothing and waited for their politicians to save them.

That's what power hungry polititians wants.

Nitro Express
01-07-2007, 10:26 PM
I'm for individual freedom under the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Period.

We don't need the govt. legislating our morality or telling a woman what she can do with her body.

We don't need a beurocracy in the middle of whether you daughter can abort a pregnancy after she's raped.

The Republicans want to lock the little guy out and the Democrats want to micro manage us. I like niether of them.

Dan
01-07-2007, 10:44 PM
Originally posted by PlexiBrown
I would rather just get a blow job from a chick. You stick your dick in a vagina and there is just way too much that can go wrong.

Do tell?

blonddgirl777
01-07-2007, 10:45 PM
Originally posted by Nitro Express
... We don't need the govt. legislating our morality or telling a woman what she can do with her body.

We don't need a beurocracy in the middle of whether you daughter can abort a pregnancy after she's raped...

That's right!

What always striked me was to hear those issues being so strongly debated at election time... it seams very important for Americans to know where the politicians running for pres. stand and what they will decide about it!

To most of us, those questions are not potiticaly related at all...

blonddgirl777
01-07-2007, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Dan
Do tell?

What a change of wind for that thread!
L.O.L.

Nickdfresh
01-08-2007, 05:40 AM
Originally posted by blonddgirl777
I noticed that a lot of Republicans are against those issues that protect and help women in general;
the pill available for everyone, abortion, wellfare, child support, daycare etc...

Very true. And they also exaggerate what are rare, extreme procedures, making them seem as if they're are common place...

Nitro Express
01-08-2007, 07:34 AM
Organized religion is all about controlling people through family pressure, peer pressure, fear, guilt, and superstition. These organizations seem to set the bar so high moral wise nobody can stay above it and so theres two choices: 1) You can be a hypocrite and lie or 2) You can be honest and be punished.

There's a lot of lying and hypocracy on the religiouse right. The US seems to suffer from the puritans who came here to escape persecution in Europe but wasted no time persecuting over here. There's an enormouse lack of individual thinking. Look at Utah. They had thousands waiting at the airport to greet Bush and he was still a big hero there; even when the rest of the country were onto the Bush Administration's deception and voted Democrat to break the grip on power the last election.

Some people don't want the govt. to take their gun because a small number of people misuse and abuse the right to have a gun.

These same people think the govt. needs to ban all abortions because some people abuse it and use it as birth control.

What's funny is the people who want to ban abortion are mostly religiouse. Now, if it's murder, then the people involved have to answer to God for it. Let's leave it at that. We don't have to glorify it. But we need to let little Sally know little Joey's pistol is loaded and cocked and she can have a bun in the oven because of it.

Ignoring sex won't make it go away. I want my daughters to know about sex and I want them to know how to use a gun so they can shoot the bastard who tries to rape them so they won't have to have an abortion.

Nitro Express
01-08-2007, 07:46 AM
Originally posted by PlexiBrown
I would rather just get a blow job from a chick. You stick your dick in a vagina and there is just way too much that can go wrong.

I wish it was that easy. Some of us like vaginas and God is laughing because they are slimey, smelly, high maintanance things that can get you into a heap load of trouble.

I guess it's like baseball, you haven't ran all the bases until you sink the pink.

ULTRAMAN VH
01-08-2007, 07:51 AM
Originally posted by FORD
Republicans are against issues that help and protect ANYONE or ANYTHING.

Except corporations and billionaires.

Well lets see Furd, real Conservatives want U.S. citizens to get off their rear ends and make a living for themselves. Since when has it become a crime to promote self reliance. The Dumbocrat libbys prefer a huge controlling Government that promotes dependency on Government programs (aka) welfare and handouts at the expense of tax payers money. Where is the motivation to earn a living when Uncle Sam is handing you a check. I witness this nonsense everyday in the court system. I understand that there are individuals out there who are down on their luck or life has delt them a life altering tragedy. But no matter how down trodden you are, at least show some initiative that you want to be independant and if Big Brother gives you a handout to get back on your feet, stay on your feet and again become self reliant and not dependant on Big Government.

BigBadBrian
01-11-2007, 02:42 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
Tough tits for you jack-ass.

All of these were the right decision. You're ignorant.

You're a baby-killer, OD. Too bad your mom wasn't.

:gulp:

blonddgirl777
01-12-2007, 02:23 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
You're a baby-killer, OD. Too bad your mom wasn't.

:gulp:

And you sound like a women controler...
Get with the program; women WILL have abortions (they always did) weather or not the population tries to empeach that!

ODShowtime
01-12-2007, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
You're a baby-killer, OD. Too bad your mom wasn't.

:gulp:

No, you support politicians with unrealistic policies that run counter to human nature from the last couple thousand years. Poverty and overpopulation run hand-in-hand, but it's not like you'd know that.

You're ignorant too.

NEXT