MPAA adds new factor to rating system

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ally_Kat
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    • Jan 2004
    • 7608

    MPAA adds new factor to rating system

    Hollywood ratings system gets smoke in it eyes

    Fri May 11,12:55 AM ET


    Filmmakers now might get an R rating as a thank you for smoking.

    The Motion Picture Assn. of America (MPAA) said Thursday that its rating board will consider film depictions of smoking among the criteria for assigning movie ratings. Anti-tobacco activists have been pressing for an automatic R rating for films with smoking scenes, but MPAA chairman and CEO Dan Glickman rejected the proposal for a more nuanced approach.

    "The MPAA film rating system has existed for nearly 40 years as an educational tool for parents to assist them in making decisions about what movies are appropriate for their children," Glickman said. "It is a system that is designed to evolve alongside modern parental concerns."

    In line with that evolution, the MPAA ratings board "will now consider smoking as a factor among many other factors, including violence, sexual situations and language, in the rating of films," he said.

    "Clearly, smoking is increasingly an unacceptable behavior in our society," Glickman said. "There is broad awareness of smoking as a unique public health concern due to nicotine's highly addictive nature, and no parent wants their child to take up the habit. The appropriate response of the rating system is to give more information to parents on this issue."

    Glickman described the move as an extension of the MPAA's practice of factoring underage smoking into the rating of films. The ratings board will ask three questions, he said:

    = Is the smoking pervasive?

    = Does the film glamorize smoking?

    = Is there a historic or other mitigating context?

    Also, when a film's rating is affected by the depiction of smoking, the rating will include such phrases as "glamorized smoking" or "pervasive smoking."

    "Some have called for a mandatory R rating on all films that contain any smoking," Glickman said. "We do not believe such a step would further the specific goal of providing information to parents on this issue. Unfortunately, the debate on this extreme proposal has become heavily politicized, and many inaccurate statements have been made. While those pushing this proposal are no doubt well-intentioned, it is important that there is an accurate understanding of the declining prevalence of smoking in non-R-rated films."

    From July 2004-July 2006, the percentage of films that included "even a fleeting glimpse of smoking" dropped from 60% to 52%, and 75% of those fetched an R rating for other factors, he said.

    The Directors Guild of America was among several organizations issuing statements of support for the MPAA moves.

    "The DGA supports the MPAA's announced enhancements to the ratings system and applauds their effort to provide parents with increased information on the depiction of smoking in movies," the guild said. "We appreciate that they, like us, are working to find the delicate balance between addressing important health concerns and safeguarding free expression."

    The Screen Actors Guild also gave a statement of support.

    "As advocates for both creative rights and child-protection legislation, we believe this is a reasonable approach to deal with a serious health issue," SAG deputy national executive director Pamm Fair said.

    American Cancer Society CEO John Seffrin said he was pleased by the MPAA's "substantive effort to eliminate tobacco use as a cause of death and disability."

    Seffrin cited "evidence that children and youth are particularly vulnerable to the images of tobacco use on movie screens."

    But not all the reaction was rosy.

    American Legacy Foundation said the new MPAA ratings policy "falls short and fails to implement the meaningful recommendations set forth by numerous organizations." Washington-based ALF states its mission as being "dedicated to a world where young people reject tobacco and anyone can quit."

    Hollywood has been under increasing pressure to take steps to ease the purported effect of entertainment content in several areas, from smoking to child obesity. Next week on Capitol Hill, the Senate Commerce Committee begins its examination of the effect violent content has on children.

    Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., is expected to introduce legislation giving the FCC the power to regulate such content -- much as it does indecent content on television. In April, the FCC approved a report on TV violence that asked lawmakers for the requisite enforcement powers.

    A Senate-FCC industry task force has been convened to identify ways of forcing content producers to encourage children to eat healthy foods.

    Roth Army Militia
  • Ally_Kat
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    • Jan 2004
    • 7608

    #2
    So you can unload a couple of cusses (and even venture into sex) and still be PG-13, but smoke too much and you can be getting an R.

    WTF?
    Roth Army Militia

    Comment

    • Coyote
      ROTH ARMY SUPREME
      • Jan 2004
      • 8185

      #3
      Apparently, the MPAA are bored.
      Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

      Originally posted by Seshmeister
      It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

      Comment

      • FORD
        ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

        • Jan 2004
        • 58755

        #4
        As a rule, I despise the MPAA, like the RIAA for their corporate fascism and ridiculous claims that they OWN something that you have already paid for.

        But something DOES have to be done about smoking in movies. I've seen dozens of movies where it's obvious advertising and product placement, nothing more.

        And they do it because they can't get away with it on TV. Though the standards seem to be slipping there in recent years as well.

        There are really very few justifications for including it in a movie, unless there's something significant about the addiction (i.e. the movie about Edward R. Murrow couldn't have been made without acknowledging that he was a chain smoker)

        Not sure if it deserves it's own rating. I'd prefer the MPAA banned the advertising of tobacco altogether, unless it can be proven to be required for the storyline.
        Eat Us And Smile

        Cenk For America 2024!!

        Justice Democrats


        "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

        Comment

        • Coyote
          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
          • Jan 2004
          • 8185

          #5
          A lot of detective-movies would suck without cigs, IMO...
          Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

          Originally posted by Seshmeister
          It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

          Comment

          • FORD
            ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

            • Jan 2004
            • 58755

            #6
            Like I said, if you can make a relevant case for it as a plot device, maybe.....

            But that's not the case with most of these movies, most of them aimed directly at a teenage audience, where it's one long fucking Phillip Morris commercial for 2 hours, with absolutely no relevance to the plot.

            How many times did the "Marlboro" logo appear in the movie "Superman II"?? And that movie is now shown on TV regularly, which means they get away with breaking the law against TV advertising of tobacco products.
            Eat Us And Smile

            Cenk For America 2024!!

            Justice Democrats


            "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

            Comment

            • Cult of Roth
              Roadie
              • Mar 2004
              • 144

              #7
              Originally posted by FORD
              Like I said, if you can make a relevant case for it as a plot device, maybe.....

              But that's not the case with most of these movies, most of them aimed directly at a teenage audience, where it's one long fucking Phillip Morris commercial for 2 hours, with absolutely no relevance to the plot.

              How many times did the "Marlboro" logo appear in the movie "Superman II"?? And that movie is now shown on TV regularly, which means they get away with breaking the law against TV advertising of tobacco products.
              Can't they digitally edit that stuff out now, if they want to?

              I was watching the 5th Element on TV the other day, and there's this scene where Bruce Willis loses the cops, causing them to smash into a McDonalds trailer, at least at the theater it was a McDonalds trailer. On TV all the McDs logos had been erased, so all you could see were a bunch of red french fry boxes.

              Not really the point here, I know, but if smoking does become R rated they have a way to still make those older movies compliant...
              Roth EUAS Militia

              Comment

              • Coyote
                ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                • Jan 2004
                • 8185

                #8
                Of course, one could bring back the old cliché of "the badguys smoke"...

                But that would be retardation.
                Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

                Originally posted by Seshmeister
                It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

                Comment

                • Ally_Kat
                  ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 7608

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FORD


                  How many times did the "Marlboro" logo appear in the movie "Superman II"??
                  I've watched that movie several times and I haven't even noticed that. But then again, being familiar with the surroundings, I tend to block out the white noise.
                  Roth Army Militia

                  Comment

                  Working...