PDA

View Full Version : Hugo Chavez Shuts down tv station..



Unchainme
05-28-2007, 11:43 AM
May 27, 2007, 11:48PM
Venezuelan TV station shuts down

By IAN JAMES Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press

CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuela's oldest private television station went off the air just before midnight Sunday as thousands banged on pots and pans in protest against President Hugo Chavez's decision not to renew the license of the opposition-aligned channel.

Fireworks exploded across Caracas as crowds of Chavez's supporters celebrated the expiration of Radio Caracas Television's license and the birth of a new public service station.

The studios of RCTV — the sole opposition-aligned TV station with nationwide reach — were filled with teary-eyed people who applauded, embraced and shouted "freedom!" in the final minutes on the air.

They bowed their heads in prayer, and a presenter declared: "Long live Venezuela! We will return soon." Then the national anthem was played and the screen turned black. Within seconds, it was replaced with the insignia of TVES, the new state-funded channel assigned to the frequency.

Chavez says he is democratizing the airwaves by turning a "coup-mongering" network's signal over for public use. His opponents condemned the shutdown of RCTV as an assault on free speech and a blow to democracy.

Police broke up one opposition protest using a water cannon and tear gas, and later clashed with protesters who set afire trash heaps in affluent eastern Caracas. Police said some protesters fired shots, and others threw rocks and bottles. Police said 11 officers were injured.

Television stars at RCTV hosted an emotional on-air goodbye mixed with denunciations of Chavez's government.

"We are living an injustice," said Eyla Adrian, a 35-year-old presenter, her eyes welling with tears.

RCTV's top executive, Marcel Granier, said Chavez's decision "marks a turn toward totalitarianism."

The socialist president and his supporters accuse RCTV of supporting a failed 2002 coup, violating broadcast laws and regularly showing programs with excessive violence and sexual content.

In 2002, RCTV and other private channels broadcast opposition calls for protests to overthrow Chavez while giving scant coverage to Chavez's return to power amid protests by his supporters.

Andres Izarra, who now heads the state-financed channel Telesur, said he quit his job as a newsroom manager at RCTV because he was disgusted with the way "everything was censored" during the coup.

"The order was 'zero Chavismo on the screen.' Nothing related to Chavez, his allies, his congressmen, members of his party," Izarra said. "When I hear the owners of RCTV talk about freedom of expression, it seems to me a great hypocrisy."

While fireworks crackled, thousands of red-clad government supporters gathered around giant screens set up in a Caracas plaza to watch the new channel's first transmission. Some danced to the classic salsa tune "Todo tiene su final" — "Everything Has Its End."

Briceida Rivas, 28, said the new public service channel is cause for celebration, calling RCTV's programs "bad for children."

The new channel, TVES, began its transmission with an orchestra playing the national anthem. Officials said that was to be followed with a live program including musical performances, and then a state-financed film about independence hero Simon Bolivar.

RCTV, founded in 1953, was Venezuela's oldest private TV station and was regularly the top channel in viewer ratings. But Chavez called its soap operas "pure poison" that promote capitalism.

Granier called his station's shutdown a flagrant abuse of power by Chavez.

"He's losing more than he thinks he's gaining. He's losing international recognition and he's losing the respect of his people," Granier said, while hundreds of protesters massed outside the station chanting, "No to the shutdown!"

Venezuela's Supreme Court has ruled that the replacement station can use RCTV's broadcasting equipment and told the military to guard it.

Most Venezuelan news media are in private hands, including many newspapers and radio stations that remain staunchly critical of Chavez. But the only other major opposition-sided TV channel is Globovision, which is not seen in all parts of the country.

Rafael Molina, president of the Miami-based Inter American Press Association, said "the concession of broadcast frequencies should not serve to reward or punish media outlets for their editorial line."

Information Minister Willian Lara argued that RCTV was rejected because "it systematically violates the constitution. It is strictly a legal case."

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4840885.html

Eddie's Booze
05-28-2007, 02:57 PM
HAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

:D

Fuck that place!

Wallyg
05-29-2007, 09:19 AM
The Venezuelan people deserve better. But really, what did they expect--that he would be the one tyrannical Marxist on Earth to leave television alone? Mass communication is the biggest threat to fascists. Why do you think politicians are obsessed with shutting down talk radio and "regulating" the internet? Why do you think the Democrat party want to demonize Fox News? Why do Republicans despise CNN? Because they know information and a free discussion is the antidote to...them. Let's see if the Venezuelans will cut this maniac off at the knees before they are completely and irreversibly oppressed.

hideyoursheep
05-29-2007, 11:09 AM
When do we go in and rid the world of this evil dictator?:lol:

Guitar Shark
05-29-2007, 03:27 PM
If he could somehow shut down Fox News, the world would be a better place.

Sgt Schultz
05-29-2007, 03:50 PM
That's OK - Chavez hates Bush, so he can do no wrong.

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20070528/capt.77a0ccbfdf4e450a936958c132374b18.venezuela_ch avez_vs_tv_car119.jpg?x=380&y=272&sig=cyEq7U2fC0Y_oRb1NqUiZA--

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20070528/capt.ac809331bf40472083de531ee53907ac.aptopix_vene zuela_chavez_vs_tv_car125.jpg?x=380&y=258&sig=iqvO7gYs4FDXcftp5adgMg--

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20070528/capt.sge.hqx39.280507192332.photo01.photo.default-512x346.jpg?x=380&y=256&sig=bm0SDBozbwu53Jval1YTrg--

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20070528/capt.sge.hqx39.280507192332.photo03.photo.default-512x339.jpg?x=380&y=251&sig=7DasURcFmHJ1FPKzVMS2fA--

Nickdfresh
05-29-2007, 05:40 PM
Which is why he's a "bad dictator," unlike all those "good dictators" that sell us oil and torture people for us...

Big Train
05-29-2007, 10:55 PM
Danny Glover better hope he makes a movie Chavez likes. If he does, he has a TV station to play it non-stop.

Wonder what his points are on that deal...

ELVIS
05-29-2007, 10:59 PM
So, Nick, Chavez isn't in the oil business ??

WACF
05-29-2007, 11:02 PM
Originally posted by ELVIS
So, Nick, Chavez isn't in the oil business ??

With all the foreign investment and experience to get the wells going he now is...

Guitar Shark
05-31-2007, 04:24 PM
In all seriousness...

FORD, what are your thoughts regarding Chavez shutting down this television station?

FORD
05-31-2007, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
In all seriousness...

FORD, what are your thoughts regarding Chavez shutting down this television station?

In all seriousness......

It sounds like RCTV is a foreign owned station which openly advocates the overthrow of the elected Venezeulan government.

Sounds a little like FAUX News in the 1990's, don't you think?? ;)



Should Chavez interfere with a TV network? Well, consider the following examples....

I'd say it ranks right up there with firing Dan Rather for questioning Chimpy's National Guard record, based on false evidence planted by right wing bloggers.

Or targeting Rosie O'Donnell because she dared to question the sacred holy myth of "9-11" in front of a live TV audience.

Or trying to paint Scott Ritter as a "pedophile" because he knew for a FACT that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and was trying to bring that fact to the American people to prevent this tragic clusterfuck of an illegal occupation.

Or even a supposedly "liberal" network like Air America silencing the radio hosts who live up to the name and replacing them with corporatist AIPAC shills.

Or Clear Channel being formed in the first place with BCE money just in time to promote candidate Chimpy, and now being sold to BAIN Capital (owned by Mitt Romney) just in time to help the candidacy of .....

...drum roll please.....

MITT ROMNEY.

(Who, not coincidentally, is being backed by certain factions of the BCE)

Bottom line: Government interference in media blows no matter what country you're in, but let's not pretend that Chavez is any worse than Team BCE in this regard.

Guitar Shark
06-01-2007, 11:45 AM
Originally posted by FORD
In all seriousness......

It sounds like RCTV is a foreign owned station which openly advocates the overthrow of the elected Venezeulan government.

Sounds a little like FAUX News in the 1990's, don't you think?? ;)



Should Chavez interfere with a TV network? Well, consider the following examples....

I'd say it ranks right up there with firing Dan Rather for questioning Chimpy's National Guard record, based on false evidence planted by right wing bloggers.

Or targeting Rosie O'Donnell because she dared to question the sacred holy myth of "9-11" in front of a live TV audience.

Or trying to paint Scott Ritter as a "pedophile" because he knew for a FACT that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and was trying to bring that fact to the American people to prevent this tragic clusterfuck of an illegal occupation.

Or even a supposedly "liberal" network like Air America silencing the radio hosts who live up to the name and replacing them with corporatist AIPAC shills.

Or Clear Channel being formed in the first place with BCE money just in time to promote candidate Chimpy, and now being sold to BAIN Capital (owned by Mitt Romney) just in time to help the candidacy of .....

...drum roll please.....

MITT ROMNEY.

(Who, not coincidentally, is being backed by certain factions of the BCE)

Bottom line: Government interference in media blows no matter what country you're in, but let's not pretend that Chavez is any worse than Team BCE in this regard.

I'd say it's worse in this case. Chavez refused to renew a license for a television station that provided opposing viewpoints. When has "Team BCE" (as you like to call it) ever actually denied a broadcasting license for any of the networks or individuals mentioned in your post?

FORD
06-01-2007, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
I'd say it's worse in this case. Chavez refused to renew a license for a television station that provided opposing viewpoints. When has "Team BCE" (as you like to call it) ever actually denied a broadcasting license for any of the networks or individuals mentioned in your post?

Team BCE doesn't have to pull licenses because there are NO opposition networks :(

The question is, how would they react if a Liberal television network went on the air tomorrow. Let alone one owned by foreigners (other than Rupert Murdoch)

Guitar Shark
06-01-2007, 12:29 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Team BCE doesn't have to pull licenses because there are NO opposition networks :(

The question is, how would they react if a Liberal television network went on the air tomorrow. Let alone one owned by foreigners (other than Rupert Murdoch)

Translation: Never. ;)

FORD
06-01-2007, 12:57 PM
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Translation: Never. ;)

No....

Translation: Why pull the licenses on stations when it's easier to just have your "defense" contractors and other corporatist pigs buy them all?

WACF
06-01-2007, 01:44 PM
Thing is with the far left they are true believers in the nanny state.

Our NDP are the same.

They want to nationalize all resources and media...phone, cable, internet...everything.

No competetion...no investment...just tax payer funded services for tax payers....which we stil have to pay for when we want them....nothing like paying twice for one thing.

Full complete control over everything we have and do.

While I fully embrace their social conscience and concerns for labour...they worry me.

I think Hugo is going to show us Socialism taken too far....

FORD
06-01-2007, 02:23 PM
Nationalizing resources is actually looking pretty good right now.

Would I prefer a free enterprise system in which true competition keeps prices low and quality high? Absolutely.

But that no longer exists. At least not on this side of the 49th parallel. If you guys still have such a thing in Canada, hold on to it as long as you can.

But 3 or 4 huge companies controlling an industry (and fixing prices) doesn't equal competition. And when those companies control the government - as the oil industry, the pharmaceuticals, and the "defense" contractors do in the US, it then becomes fascism, as Mussolini himself defined it (corporatist state)

And given the worldwide results of fascism (and I mean THIS decade, not the 1940's) maybe socialism wouldn't be so bad, by comparison?

WACF
06-01-2007, 02:47 PM
The only problem I have with Nationalizing natural resources is that you can not stifel investment...which in alot of cases is foreign.

You need to have royalty taxes in place to ensure that at least you get to keep some money before all the profits...other than wages, Utilities and taxes leave the country.

The Potash Mine I work at is owned my Mosaic...which is part of Cargil...a huge US company.
Our sales for finished product are much stronger and we are looking at expansion...mainly because of Cargil's sales team, port and ships.

So...I benefit from foreign investment.

On the down swing though...there is a real "don't give a fuck" attitude towards us as employees from the decision makers down south.
Something that really stuck us as odd after being owned by a Canadian company...we did not expect any change.

My province' Uranium industry is heavy in French investment.


Much like Hugo's oil wells...it took foregin investment and expertise to get that oil flowing.


Unfortunatley....when big companies keep buying out small companies we lose comptetion.
Everyone has their price....and our costs as consumers are going up.

We have not slipped as far as you guys have...It is hard to have free trade agreements than start with protectionism.
But...we do need to ensure all does not get lost...some controls need to be put in place.

I just do not like the idea of the nanny state.

EAT MY ASSHOLE
06-01-2007, 05:42 PM
Originally posted by FORD
No....

Translation: Why pull the licenses on stations when it's easier to just have your "defense" contractors and other corporatist pigs buy them all?

That explains Keith Olberman's current employment, of course...

Guitar Shark
06-01-2007, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
That explains Keith Olberman's current employment, of course...

Yes, because clearly he espouses the neofacsist ideology held by everyone at "MSRNC," as our favorite conspiracy theorist likes to call it... ;)

FORD
06-01-2007, 06:37 PM
To the contrary..... by keeping Keith Olberman on the air, they can claim to be "unbiased". Even though everyone else on the network is a Busheep.

Still at least they have ONE. CNN meanwhile gives prime time air to a raving Nazi lunatic like Glenn BecKKK, and FAUX....well, do I even need to say it?

EAT MY ASSHOLE
06-01-2007, 08:06 PM
Originally posted by FORD
To the contrary..... by keeping Keith Olberman on the air, they can claim to be "unbiased". Even though everyone else on the network is a Busheep.

Still at least they have ONE. CNN meanwhile gives prime time air to a raving Nazi lunatic like Glenn BecKKK, and FAUX....well, do I even need to say it?

Oh, cut the crap!!! If they wanted a "Token Lib" they could have gotten far less insightful/credible. And they would NOT give him the 8pm timeslot!!! Meanwhile, what say you to Chris Matthews? If it weren't for his criticisms of the administration, the whole leak case debacle may never have happened!!!

And as for the likes of Beckkk, i'm convinced the one reason he's on the air at all is b/c execs at CNN wants to expose the far-right for the crazy uneducated lunatics for what they are!!!

FORD
06-01-2007, 08:50 PM
Tweety Matthews ain't no Liberal. I don't care WHO he used to work for.

I wish I could find the quote where he's having a gay crush on Chimpy right on the air during the "Mission Accomplished" fiasco. It made it pretty obvious what side he was on (and I don't mean sexually)

As for your theory about BecKKK and CNN, I might have bought that idea if Ted Turner were still running the network. But under AOL ownership, CNN has become FAUX II. They just conceal it better.

Nickdfresh
06-01-2007, 10:05 PM
Originally posted by ELVIS
So, Nick, Chavez isn't in the oil business ??

When did I say he wasn't?

Of course he is, or his nation is. Your neighborhood CITGO stations sells "his" oil here and contributes a significant amount of product to the US market...

My point is: why is he worse than any other supposed dictator? Chavez was democratically elected and maintains a sizable majority of support in Venezuela.

Do I like him? Not really. I think he's become a bombastic, meglomanical cunt that's turning into everything he claims to hate.

But the double standard of left wing bastards versus reactionary bastards is a bit appalling here. The attempt at some judgemental moralistic aspersion is so putrid and hypocritically gauling it's not funny...

GO-SPURS-GO
06-10-2007, 04:35 AM
Originally posted by FORD


Still at least they have ONE. CNN meanwhile gives prime time air to a raving Nazi lunatic like Glenn BecKKK, and FAUX....well, do I even need to say it?

Hey Ford, I'm just curious as to why you don't like Glenn BecKKK?

Nickdfresh
06-10-2007, 09:12 AM
Originally posted by WACF
...
Unfortunatley....when big companies keep buying out small companies we lose comptetion.
Everyone has their price....and our costs as consumers are going up.

...

And jobs are lost through the streamlining process and eliminations of redundancy (which happened to my brother-in-law), leading to increasing social problems of underemployment, the Wal-Martization of America (lower wages with no or few benefits), and unemployment...

Excellent post WACF...