PDA

View Full Version : BushCO Dept. of Justice. The most corrupt, idiotic since Nixon's?



LoungeMachine
01-13-2009, 07:02 PM
Report critical of former Justice Dept. official

By DEVLIN BARRETT – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — A former top Justice Department official made false statements to Congress and violated federal law in overseeing the agency's civil rights division, investigators say.

The accusations against Bradley Schlozman, the former acting head of the civil rights division, are included in a new report by the department's inspector general, Glenn Fine.

Tuesday's report is the latest of several inquiries that found senior Justice Department officials violated civil service laws under the tenure of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Gonzales has denied knowledge of the conduct by his deputies, but the series of reports paints a disturbing portrait of the nation's top law enforcement agency being pulled in a sharply political direction during the Bush administration.

The report says Schlozman politicized and mistreated his staff and tried to punish agency employees he believed were too liberal. The report cited an e-mail in which Schlozman noted it had been awhile since he'd had to "scream with a bloodcurdling cry at some commie."

In the same 2003 missive, Schlozman used derogatory language to describe his pleasure in punishing career staffers, writing that "bitchslapping a bunch of (division) attorneys really did get the blood pumping and was even enjoyable once in a while."

At other times, the report said, Schlozman urged the hiring of "real Americans," apparently meaning conservatives, as opposed to liberals, whom he referred to as "libs" and "pinkos."

Schlozman resigned from the Justice Department in 2007 and is now an attorney in private practice in Wichita, Kan.

The report also faults the managers above Schlozman who, it said, received warning signs of inappropriate conduct but did not stop him or rein him in.

Investigators referred the case to federal prosecutors last spring, but they decided last week not to file charges against Schlozman.

Patricia Riley, special counsel to the U.S. Attorney for Washington, said the office conducted "a thorough and exhaustive review of the issue" of whether Schlozman lied to Congress. She declined to say exactly why the office chose not to file charges, but added the inquiry was conducted by six veteran prosecutors.

Investigators said Schlozman should not be considered suitable for government employment in the future, and they are forwarding the findings to the relevant bar associations.

Schlozman's lawyer, William Jordan, denied the allegations, saying his client had passed a lie-detector test.

"The report released today is inaccurate, incomplete, biased, unsupported by the law, and contrary to the facts," said Jordan, who accused the investigators themselves of "extraordinary bias and lack of ethical and legal standards."

The investigation, conducted with the agency's Office of Professional Responsibility, found that Schlozman did not tell the truth to Congress when he told Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., in a June 2007 hearing that he did not consider political affiliations in hiring.

Citing the "troubling conduct" described in the report, Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said the agency has since reformed its hiring practices. "We are confident that the institutional problems identified in today's report no longer exist and will not recur," Carr said.

The Justice Department controversies — in particular the firing of nine U.S. attorneys — led to Gonzales' resignation in 2007 amid charges that White House officials under President George W. Bush had influenced decisions at the normally independent Justice Department.

Earlier inquiries by Fine's office concluded that top Gonzales advisers discriminated against applicants for career jobs who weren't Republican or conservative loyalists.

The federal government makes a distinction between "career" and "political" appointees, and it is a violation of civil service laws and Justice Department policy to hire career employees on the basis of political affiliation or allegiance.

Yet Monica Goodling, who served as Gonzales' counselor and White House liaison, routinely asked career job applicants about their politics, a previous report concluded.

Investigators also concluded that the White House political affairs office recommended a majority of the immigration judge candidates whom the department considered hiring, including one name forwarded by then-top Bush adviser Karl Rove.

On the Net:
Justice Department IG's report: http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0901/final.pdf


Go to Google News©2009 Google - Map data ©2009 Tele Atlas - Terms of UseReport critical of former Justice Dept. official
By DEVLIN BARRETT – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — A former top Justice Department official made false statements to Congress and violated federal law in overseeing the agency's civil rights division, investigators say.

The accusations against Bradley Schlozman, the former acting head of the civil rights division, are included in a new report by the department's inspector general, Glenn Fine.

Tuesday's report is the latest of several inquiries that found senior Justice Department officials violated civil service laws under the tenure of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Gonzales has denied knowledge of the conduct by his deputies, but the series of reports paints a disturbing portrait of the nation's top law enforcement agency being pulled in a sharply political direction during the Bush administration.

The report says Schlozman politicized and mistreated his staff and tried to punish agency employees he believed were too liberal. The report cited an e-mail in which Schlozman noted it had been awhile since he'd had to "scream with a bloodcurdling cry at some commie."

In the same 2003 missive, Schlozman used derogatory language to describe his pleasure in punishing career staffers, writing that "bitchslapping a bunch of (division) attorneys really did get the blood pumping and was even enjoyable once in a while."

At other times, the report said, Schlozman urged the hiring of "real Americans," apparently meaning conservatives, as opposed to liberals, whom he referred to as "libs" and "pinkos."

Schlozman resigned from the Justice Department in 2007 and is now an attorney in private practice in Wichita, Kan.

The report also faults the managers above Schlozman who, it said, received warning signs of inappropriate conduct but did not stop him or rein him in.

Investigators referred the case to federal prosecutors last spring, but they decided last week not to file charges against Schlozman.

Patricia Riley, special counsel to the U.S. Attorney for Washington, said the office conducted "a thorough and exhaustive review of the issue" of whether Schlozman lied to Congress. She declined to say exactly why the office chose not to file charges, but added the inquiry was conducted by six veteran prosecutors.

Investigators said Schlozman should not be considered suitable for government employment in the future, and they are forwarding the findings to the relevant bar associations.

Schlozman's lawyer, William Jordan, denied the allegations, saying his client had passed a lie-detector test.

"The report released today is inaccurate, incomplete, biased, unsupported by the law, and contrary to the facts," said Jordan, who accused the investigators themselves of "extraordinary bias and lack of ethical and legal standards."

The investigation, conducted with the agency's Office of Professional Responsibility, found that Schlozman did not tell the truth to Congress when he told Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., in a June 2007 hearing that he did not consider political affiliations in hiring.

Citing the "troubling conduct" described in the report, Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said the agency has since reformed its hiring practices. "We are confident that the institutional problems identified in today's report no longer exist and will not recur," Carr said.

The Justice Department controversies — in particular the firing of nine U.S. attorneys — led to Gonzales' resignation in 2007 amid charges that White House officials under President George W. Bush had influenced decisions at the normally independent Justice Department.

Earlier inquiries by Fine's office concluded that top Gonzales advisers discriminated against applicants for career jobs who weren't Republican or conservative loyalists.

The federal government makes a distinction between "career" and "political" appointees, and it is a violation of civil service laws and Justice Department policy to hire career employees on the basis of political affiliation or allegiance.

Yet Monica Goodling, who served as Gonzales' counselor and White House liaison, routinely asked career job applicants about their politics, a previous report concluded.

Investigators also concluded that the White House political affairs office recommended a majority of the immigration judge candidates whom the department considered hiring, including one name forwarded by then-top Bush adviser Karl Rove.

On the Net:
Justice Department IG's report: http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0901/final.pdf
Hosted by Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

kwame k
01-13-2009, 10:36 PM
WASHINGTON – The incoming Obama administration should launch a criminal investigation of Bush administration officials to see whether they broke the law in the name of national security, a House Democratic report said Tuesday. President-elect Barack Obama has been more cautious on the issue and has not endorsed such a recommendation.

Along with the criminal probe, the report called for a Sept. 11-style commission with subpoena power, to gather facts and make recommendations on preventing misuse of power, according to the report by the Democratic staff of the House Judiciary Committee.

The report covers Bush administration policies that Democrats have protested for some time. Among them: interrogation of foreign detainees, warrantless wiretaps, retribution against critics, manipulation of intelligence and political dismissals of U.S. attorneys.

The White House was asked for comment on the report Tuesday, but did not immediately respond.

However, in an interview this month with The Associated Press, Vice President Dick Cheney said, "I can't speak for everybody in the administration, but my view would be that the people who carried out that program — intelligence surveillance program, the enhanced interrogation program, with respect to al Qaeda captives — in fact were authorized to do what they did ... ."

Cheney said legal opinions supported the officials.

"And I believe they followed those legal opinions and I don't have any reason to believe that they did anything wrong or inappropriate," the vice president said.

Obama said last week in a television interview, "We're still evaluating how we're going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions and so forth. And obviously we're going to be looking at past practices and I don't believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand I also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards."

Obama said intelligence officials were "extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don't want them to suddenly feel like they've got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering."

Obama said he has not made a final decision about a Sept. 11-type commission.

The criminal probe may need a special prosecutor named by the attorney general, the report said.

An alternative would be expansion of an existing investigation into the CIA's alleged destruction of a tape or tapes showing harsh interrogation methods against a prisoner.

The criminal investigation would include issues apart from national security, such as whether laws were violated in the politically inspired firing of U.S. attorneys.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said his staff has met with the Obama transition officials on the report. The president-elect's transition team has not endorsed it.

The congressionally appointed commission should have subpoena power, the report said. It suggested the new president order "full cooperation by all present and past federal employees with requests for information."

Conyers already has introduced legislation to form the commission.


Link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090113/ap_on_go_pr_wh/democrats_bush)

kwame k
01-13-2009, 10:40 PM
We should really start a thread of Bush, Inc's greatest hits.......sort of a parting gift for these soulless cocksuckers.......at least they are men of faith and pray before every meeting........too bad the meetings were on torture and killing people.

LoungeMachine
01-13-2009, 10:48 PM
I've started a few of those, we should dig them up.

My fave was the "Hey Repukes, name your Favorite Bush Accomplishment"

:crickets:

kwame k
01-13-2009, 11:00 PM
Yeah, I want to get David Addinton and John Yu(?) the two fuck nuts at OLC some up front coverage.....They're the ones who told Bush it was legal and Constitutional to abuse his Presidential powers the way he did.....or should I say, they way Cheney allowed him to.

FORD
01-13-2009, 11:16 PM
Saw Keith Olbermann's report on this Schlozzman clown. What a piece of shit he is. Maybe they should leave Gitmo open, just for treasonous fucks like him?

bueno bob
01-14-2009, 12:45 AM
What I'm wondering about, honestly, is whether or not Obama's going to have the balls to seriously persue criminal action against BushCo for crimes against humanity, or whether he's going to take the safe route and issue him a Presidential pardon WHEN the investigations begin.

And I say WHEN, not IF, because I don't think America as a country is going to be so fucking stupid as to let the REST of the free world begin investigations and trials against the BCE while we're sitting on our asses, ESPECIALLY when one of Obama's primary objectives is going to have to be refocusing on establishing our reputation throughout the world.

If he gives him and the other elite BCE'ers a pass on it, that'll be his first fuckup - and it's going to be a doozy.

Of course, it's pretty much at the point now that once Bush is out of office, his days of travelling overseas are pretty much over...I think that's pretty much a given to anybody with an IQ over 80...

kwame k
01-14-2009, 08:59 AM
We still haven't seen if Bush will stay true to the "Doctrine of Preemption".........you know, preemptive pardons for himself and all his buddies before he leaves office.

chefcraig
01-14-2009, 09:32 AM
So once again, the core of a situation regarding an employee's status within the administration is affected for his/her stance of being liberal. I don't get it. Apparently, sometime during my lifetime (more than likely in the nebulously remembered eighties) the term liberal underwent a drastic shift in definition. At that point, the word meant a person who was not only willing to adapt to change, they were actively seeking it out. An at times tough minded, free-thinking individual that was open minded enough to realize that change was not only a constant, it was inevitable.

So where and when did this spirit of adaptability become a liability? It's weird. Somewhere along the line, a liberal has come to mean a careless, irresponsible person. The word also has become a slur used when describing a person of homosexual tendencies. (And more often than not, the people that use the term as in the latter example are the very same types that end up in men's room stalls tapping their feet, the type that prefer their pages bent over, if you get my drift.)

Around the same time, the concept of voicing dissent with the various policies offered by our government became an act of treason. Huh? It's one thing to respect and support your country and it's leaders, it's quite another to follow along so blindly that like a line of lemmings, you tend to have your nose so deeply buried in belief that you fail to notice you've just stepped off the edge of a very steep cliff. Look, just because every bozo in the IHOP is dumping ketchup on their eggs that morning does not mean that you have to do so as well, let alone claim to enjoy it when you don't.

Being faithful to one's country is an honorable thing. Yet mindlessly parroting the ruling power's dogma while throwing rocks (or worse) at those that may question it is somewhat futile, as it does not rightfully serve the public. Unfortunately, it also allows you to wrap yourself in the flag and piss all over people in the name of freedom if taken to it's most extreme. Come on, the idea is nothing new, when you think about it. In a debate, when a person is bankrupt of ideas, the next step is to start attacking your opponent's credibility. So instead of working toward solutions across party lines, you basically end up with a mean spirited pissing contest across the aisle. No, not exactly an expedient manner of government, to say the least.

Perhaps the rancor and disillusionment brought on in the past decade or so will be wiped clean from the slate in the near future. Maybe some of the more tainted souls in this administration will get their rightful comeuppance. It's possible, yet I doubt it. You see, that belief would require a spirit of cautious optimism. Sort of what used to be part of not only being a liberal, yet a part of all political parties, no matter which side of the aisle you happened to sit.