Tweet
Report: Health care 'value gap' hurts U.S.
Americans spend a lot more than top countries, but aren’t as healthy
The Associated Press
Thurs., March. 12, 2009
WASHINGTON - If the global economy were a 100-yard dash, the U.S. would start 23 yards behind its closest competitors because of health care that costs too much and delivers too little, a business group says in a report to be released Thursday.
The report from the Business Roundtable, which represents CEOs of major companies, says America's health care system has become a liability in a global economy.
Concern about high U.S. costs has existed for years, and business executives — whose companies provide health coverage for workers — have long called for getting costs under control. Now President Barack Obama says the costs have become unsustainable and the system must be overhauled.
Americans spend $2.4 trillion a year on health care. The Business Roundtable report says Americans in 2006 spent $1,928 per capita on health care, at least two-and-a-half times more per person than any other advanced country.
In a different twist, the report took those costs and factored benefits into the equation.
It compares statistics on life expectancy, death rates and even cholesterol readings and blood pressures. The health measures are factored together with costs into a 100-point "value" scale. That hasn't been done before, the authors said.
The results are not encouraging.
The United States is 23 points behind five leading economic competitors: Canada, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom and France. The five nations cover all their citizens, and though their systems differ, in each country the government plays a much larger role than in the U.S.
The cost-benefit disparity is even wider — 46 points — when the U.S. is compared with emerging competitors: China, Brazil and India.
"What's important is that we measure and compare actual value — not just how much we spend on health care, but the performance we get back in return," said H. Edward Hanway, CEO of the insurance company Cigna. "That's what this study does, and the results are quite eye-opening."
Higher U.S. spending funnels away resources that could be invested elsewhere in the economy, but fails to deliver a healthier work force, the report said.
"Spending more would not be a problem if our health scores were proportionately higher," Dr. Arnold Milstein, one of the authors of the study, said in an interview. "But what this study shows is that the U.S. is not getting higher levels of health and quality of care."
Other countries spend less on health care and their workers are relatively healthier, the report said.
Medical costs have long been a problem for U.S. auto companies. General Motors spends more per car on health care than it does on steel. But as more American companies face global competition, the "value gap" is being felt by more CEOs — and their hard pressed workers.
One thing the report does not do is endorse the same solution that countries like Canada have adopted: a government-run health care system.
The CEOs of the Business Roundtable believe health care for U.S. workers and their families should stay in private hands, with a government-funded safety net for low-income people.
© 2009 The Associated Press on Google. All rights reserved.
Americans spend a lot more than top countries, but aren’t as healthy
The Associated Press
Thurs., March. 12, 2009
WASHINGTON - If the global economy were a 100-yard dash, the U.S. would start 23 yards behind its closest competitors because of health care that costs too much and delivers too little, a business group says in a report to be released Thursday.
The report from the Business Roundtable, which represents CEOs of major companies, says America's health care system has become a liability in a global economy.
Concern about high U.S. costs has existed for years, and business executives — whose companies provide health coverage for workers — have long called for getting costs under control. Now President Barack Obama says the costs have become unsustainable and the system must be overhauled.
Americans spend $2.4 trillion a year on health care. The Business Roundtable report says Americans in 2006 spent $1,928 per capita on health care, at least two-and-a-half times more per person than any other advanced country.
In a different twist, the report took those costs and factored benefits into the equation.
It compares statistics on life expectancy, death rates and even cholesterol readings and blood pressures. The health measures are factored together with costs into a 100-point "value" scale. That hasn't been done before, the authors said.
The results are not encouraging.
The United States is 23 points behind five leading economic competitors: Canada, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom and France. The five nations cover all their citizens, and though their systems differ, in each country the government plays a much larger role than in the U.S.
The cost-benefit disparity is even wider — 46 points — when the U.S. is compared with emerging competitors: China, Brazil and India.
"What's important is that we measure and compare actual value — not just how much we spend on health care, but the performance we get back in return," said H. Edward Hanway, CEO of the insurance company Cigna. "That's what this study does, and the results are quite eye-opening."
Higher U.S. spending funnels away resources that could be invested elsewhere in the economy, but fails to deliver a healthier work force, the report said.
"Spending more would not be a problem if our health scores were proportionately higher," Dr. Arnold Milstein, one of the authors of the study, said in an interview. "But what this study shows is that the U.S. is not getting higher levels of health and quality of care."
Other countries spend less on health care and their workers are relatively healthier, the report said.
Medical costs have long been a problem for U.S. auto companies. General Motors spends more per car on health care than it does on steel. But as more American companies face global competition, the "value gap" is being felt by more CEOs — and their hard pressed workers.
One thing the report does not do is endorse the same solution that countries like Canada have adopted: a government-run health care system.
The CEOs of the Business Roundtable believe health care for U.S. workers and their families should stay in private hands, with a government-funded safety net for low-income people.
© 2009 The Associated Press on Google. All rights reserved.
eath, gastrointestinal hemorrhages, stomach bleeding, cardiovascular problems, kidney and liver damage, ulcers, indigestion, diarrhea, abdominal pain, allergic reactionsOFFICIAL:"Important Safety InformationPrescription CELEBREX is not for everyone. People with aspirin-sensitive asthma or allergic reactions due to aspirin or other arthritis medicines or certain drugs called sulfonamides should not take CELEBREX. IN rare cases, serious stomach problems such as bleeding can occur without warning. The most common side effects in clinical trials wer indigestion, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. CELEBREX should not be taken in late pregnancy. Tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems. If you think you are having an allergic reaction, or if you have other severe or unusual symptoms while taking CELEBREX, call your doctor, or other healthcare professional immediately." Pfizer arthritisand "off-label" uses 
presented as a graphic only on the Procrit website, so search engines CANNOT read it)The following is from the National Institute of Health -"What side effects can this medication cause? Epoetin may cause side effects. Tell your doctor if any of these symptoms are severe or do not go away: * redness, swelling, stinging, bruising, itching, or a lump at the place where you injected epoetin * headache* joint or muscle pain* upset stomach* vomiting* indigestion or "heartburn"* stomach pain* diarrhea* constipation* runny nose* sneezing* difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep Some side effects can be serious. The following symptoms are uncommon, but if you experience any of them, call your doctor immediately:* leg pain or swelling* shortness of breath* coughing up blood* cough that doesn't go away* blue-grey color or darkening around mouth or nails* dizziness* fainting* blurred vision* temporary confusion* slow or difficult speech* loss of memory or ability to concentrate* hallucinating (seeing things or hearing voices that do not exist)* extreme tiredness* seizures* weakness, numbness, heaviness, or tingling in arms or legs* floppiness or loss of muscle tone* lack of energy* increased or rapid heart beat* irregular heart beat* chest pain or tightness* excessive sweating* fever, sore throat, chills, cough, and other signs of infection* rash* hives* itching* swelling of the face, throat, tongue, lips, eyes, hands, feet, or ankles* wheezing* difficulty breathing or swallowing* hoarseness You should know epoetin and other erythropoiesis stimulating medications may increase the risk of cardiovascular problems, including death, especially in patients with heart disease. It is important for your doctor to check your hemoglobin while you are taking epoetin. If your hemoglobin rises too high or too fast while using epoetin, serious problems may occur, including edema (swelling of the hands, feet, ankles, or lower legs), heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, seizures, stroke, and blood clots in your heart, legs, or lungs. This increased risk for high blood pressure, seizures, and blood clots reported with epoetin appears to be less in people with HIV using zidovudine and epoetin, and less in people with cancer using epoetin, than in people with serious kidney disease using epoetin. Talk to your doctor about the risks of using epoetin. Epoetin may cause other side effects. Call your doctor if you have any unusual problems while taking this medication." Ortho Biotech anemia 
Comment