Obama supports the Patriot Act.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blackflag
    Banned
    • Apr 2006
    • 3406

    Obama supports the Patriot Act.

    Obama supports extending Patriot Act provisions - Yahoo! News

    "The Obama administration supports extending three key provisions of the Patriot Act that are due to expire at the end of the year, the Justice Department told Congress in a letter made public Tuesday."
  • ELVIS
    Banned
    • Dec 2003
    • 44120

    #2
    Lmao!

    Comment

    • Nickdfresh
      SUPER MODERATOR

      • Oct 2004
      • 49125

      #3
      Gee Blackflag, what exactly are those "provisions?"

      ...
      Michelle Richardson of the American Civil Liberties Union called the administration's position "a mixed bag," and said that the group hopes the next version of the Patriot Act will have important safeguards on other issues, particularly the collecting of international communications, and a specific bar on surveillance of protected First Amendment activities like peaceful protests or religious assembly.

      "We're heartened they're saying they're willing to work with Congress," Richardson said, adding that is "definitely a sea change from what we've seen in the past."
      Last edited by Nickdfresh; 09-15-2009, 07:56 PM.

      Comment

      • Blackflag
        Banned
        • Apr 2006
        • 3406

        #4
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Gee Blackflag, what exactly are those "provisions?"
        I don't understand what you're driving at.

        Answer: "the business records provision," the "lone wolf provision," and "the roving wiretaps provision."

        Comment

        • Nitro Express
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Aug 2004
          • 32798

          #5
          Yeah. I wonder when Obama will be buddy, buddy with the Bush family like Clinton.
          No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

          Comment

          • ELVIS
            Banned
            • Dec 2003
            • 44120

            #6
            Three years from now...

            Comment

            • standin
              Veteran
              • Apr 2009
              • 2274

              #7
              A roving wiretap is a wiretap specific to the United States that follows the surveillance target. For instance, if a target attempts to defeat surveillance by throwing away a phone and acquiring a new one, by moving, or by any other methods, another surveillance order would usually need to be applied for. However, a "roving" wiretap follows the target, and defeats the target's attempts at breaking the surveillance by changing location or their communications technology. It is allowed under amendments made to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (the "Wiretap Statute") in 1988 by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and was later expanded by section 604 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999.
              Roving wiretap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


              C. The "Lone Wolf' Provision
              In addition to the US A PATRIOT Act provisions scheduled to sunset at the end of this year, the "lone wolr' provision of the Intelligeme Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 Is also scheduled to sunset. Before paaage of this proviion, FISA prevented tlr: FBI from obtaining asurveillame order of an intermtioml terrorist unlea it could establish a connection to a foreign power. However, a lone wolf terrorist seeking to attack the United States may not be connected to a foreign power, or his connection to a foreign power may not be known. This provision applies only to non-U.S. persons engaging or preparing to engage in international terrorism and FISA Court authorizationis still required to monitor lone wolf terrorists.


              A lone wolf or lone-wolf fighter is someone who commits violent and/or non-violent acts in support of some group, movement, or ideology, but does so alone, outside of any command structure.

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_wolf_(terrorism)


              Theodore (Ted) Kaczynski - Lone wolf terrorist.



              The "business records provision" is vague Which "provision" exactly are you speaking of?


              The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Page 2
              Applications for Access to Certain Business Records (Including the Production of Tangible Things) Made During Calendar Year 2008 (50 U.S.C. § 1862(c)(1))
              During calendar year 2008, the Government filed and the FISC approved thirteen applications for access to certain business records (including the production of tangible things) for foreign intelligence purposes. The FISC did not deny, in whole or in part, any such application filed by the Government during calendar year 2008.l




              13 in one year is very slim.
              Matter fact, I am saddened after researching, to find out how very little the Act will assist me in fighting every day corruption. I was under the belief it was a big asset in obtaining records. I don't even think the Act was useful in busting that law maker in LA who kept his bribes in his freezer and tried to say he was immune to searches by his law maker status.
              William J. Jefferson
              William J. Jefferson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

              Patriot act was not useful
              To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
              MICHAEL G. MULLEN

              Comment

              • Nickdfresh
                SUPER MODERATOR

                • Oct 2004
                • 49125

                #8
                None of which I have a problem with as long as he 'works with congress' to insure civil liberties are protected and that protections are added.

                Comment

                • Blackflag
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 3406

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                  None of which I have a problem with as long as he 'works with congress' to insure civil liberties are protected and that protections are added.


                  Nick, I'm pretty sure they said the same thing when they wrote it the first time.

                  They only say that to placate the simple people. It's like saying, 'don't worry - I'll use some lube first.'

                  Comment

                  • Blackflag
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 3406

                    #10
                    From the 2005 renewal:

                    "the PATRIOT Act contains safeguards that protect civil liberties,"

                    "while at the same time preserving citizens’ constitutional rights and civil liberties. "

                    House Approves Renewal of Patriot Act Protections against Terrorists

                    And I know they dropped the same mindless sound bytes in 2001. But because it's Obama, you believe it this time? Here's a clue for you: it's hard to do something flat-out unconstitutional while still "preserving civil liberties."

                    Last edited by Blackflag; 09-16-2009, 12:09 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Blackflag
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 3406

                      #11
                      "Protections!'

                      "Safeguards!"

                      "Civil liberties!"



                      Comment

                      • THEDOCTOR
                        ROTH ARMY ELITE
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 6562

                        #12
                        Hey whats wrong with you communists. Can't you READ ? It the PATRIOT act! If you don't agree with a title like that, you must not love America. If you don't love it, leave you Nazi bastards!
                        Remember....you are either with us....or against us. So choose your sides detractors! Long live the loss of personal freedom and civil liberies in the name of "the war on terrah"!!!!
                        (sarcasm now off)

                        Comment

                        • Nitro Express
                          DIAMOND STATUS
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 32798

                          #13
                          Whatever. Power does what it wants anyways. Drugs are illegal but the CIA is one of the world's largest drug suppliers. If they want to listen on you, the NSA can just do that through your cell phone, On Star in your car, your laptop computer. That's what all those international standards are about on electronics. They just do it because they can.
                          No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                          Comment

                          • Nitro Express
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 32798

                            #14
                            Nobody is going to give up their cell phone, computer, blackberry, and view On Star as a bonus on their car. If the FBI got caught putting a bug in their home they would be furious but it's already bugged and traceable back to you through you account. In other words, they rape us by making us think they are doing us a favor.
                            No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49125

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Blackflag


                              Nick, I'm pretty sure they said the same thing when they wrote it the first time.
                              Not really. I'm pretty sure the blanket Nat'l Security Letters were anything but. And I rarely recall hearing of civil liberties in the lexicon.

                              They only say that to placate the simple people. It's like saying, 'don't worry - I'll use some lube first.'
                              Not if they institute tangible checks and balances and judicial review...

                              And yes, the unPatriot Act and the Warrantless wiretapping violating FISA were not just un-Constitutional, they were stupid and only clog up the works and distract from real priority targets...

                              Comment

                              Working...