Palin: American Law Should Be 'Based On The God Of The Bible And The Ten Commandments

[Va Beach VH Fan]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/10/sarah-palin-american-law_n_569922.html

Sarah Palin joined Fox News's Bill O'Reilly recently to condemn the critics of the National Day of Prayer, saying that the Judeo-Christian belief was the basis for American law and should continue to be used as a guiding force for creating future legislation.

According to Palin, the recent backlash against the National Day of Prayer is proof that some people are trying to enact a "fundamental transformation of America" and to "revisit and rewrite history" in order to shift the Christian nation away from its spiritual roots.

Palins's advice: "Go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant -- they're quite clear -- that we would create law based on the God of the bible and the ten commandments.

"What in hell scares people about talking about America's foundation of faith?" Palin continued. "It is that world view that involves some people being afraid of being able to discuss our foundation, being able to discuss God in the public square, that's the only thing I can attribute it to."

Palin had also recently criticized the decision to dis-invite the Rev. Franklin Graham from a Pentagon prayer service over concerns about his past inflammatory rhetoric about Islam, saying it was driven by a desire to be overly politically correct.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W4KSAW9RkzY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_ US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/W4KSAW9RkzY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_ US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

[jhale667]

Palin should re-read the "separation of church and state" bit and STFU.



Stupid zealot cow.

[Jesus Christ]

My response to Sarah......

[Va Beach VH Fan]

Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] ... it is declared ... that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries....
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation."
-- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams (the original language is by Joel Barlow, US Consul)

Strongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Govt in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history.
-- James Madison, "Monopolies. Perpetuities. Corporations. Ecclesiastical Endowments," in Elizabeth Fleet, "Madison's Detatched Memoranda," William & Mary Quarterly, Third series: Vol. III, No. 4 (October, 1946) p. 555. The parenthetical note at the end, which lacks a closed parenthesis in Fleet, was apparently a note Madison made to himself regarding examples of improper encroachment to use when the "Detatched Memoranda" were edited and published, and seems to imply clearly that Madison supported taxing churches. Quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church."

[binnie]

Mmmmm.......

So, the past is some sort of template for the present - in such a model, history restricts the present rather than informing it.

Good going Sarah.

What about the 'freedom' bit - if people want to participate in a 'National Day of Prayer', they can; if they rather spend all day watching porn and listening to AC/DC, so be it.....

[Seshmeister]

Given all the hurricanes in recent years it would be better to base American law on Zeus the god of weather and storms. Or maybe Poseidon could help with this oil spill thing...

[knuckleboner]

you know, sarah has a legitimate point.

after all, i don't think women are really supposed to talk much in the bible...

[kwame k]

[BITEYOASS]

Hopefully her mute hubby Todd will put his dick in the right hole this time and get her to shut the fuck up!

[bueno bob]

Sarah Palin is a history revisionist....

...and we're surprised because...?

[VanHalenFan5150]

She's an idiot. Didn't watch the video but i'm sure Bill O Reilly owned her.

[MAX]

She's an idiot. Didn't watch the video but i'm sure Bill O Reilly owned her.

Have you tried jerking off to her yet?

[Seshmeister]

Sarah Palin is a history revisionist....

...and we're surprised because...?

It's not just history.

She's a fantasist. I'm not sure she is quite as malicious as a lot of people think, I think she actually has some mental issues.

[hambon4lif]

She's an idiot. Didn't watch the video but i'm sure Bill O Reilly owned her.

I wouldn't bet money on it.
On the video in question, she pretty much owned Bill O'Really.

When she licks her lips @ 1:52, she pretty much owned me, and any other pervert that bothered to watch. My imagination, even as I post, is still in high gear.....I'm on heightened alert over here........
I lift her hair up....run my tongue up the back of her neck...it excites her....she arches her back and grinds her sexy-ass up against my junk.....I lay her down gently....dis-robe her.....and the rest of this you can see on Animal Planet...yada yada yada.

My fantasies of her notwithstanding.....she does have that certain something that absolutely irritates the cute little libs into wanting to bash her mercilessly......which prompts me to ask...

What is it exactly that you don't like about her? Does she irritate with her answers? or her mere presence?
In all fairness, I've asked alot of people around me, and they take more time trying to answer this question than I want to spend waiting around for the answer.

Does she really pose that much of a threat?? Really??

[BigBadBrian]

What is it exactly that you don't like about her? Does she irritate with her answers? or her mere presence?
In all fairness, I've asked alot of people around me, and they take more time trying to answer this question than I want to spend waiting around for the answer.

Does she really pose that much of a threat?? Really??

She's "not on their side." It's that simple. Try to get someone who has said she's stupid to say how from one of her speeches, TV appearances, or quotes. They won't...or can't.