Barrack Obama's greatest accomplishment.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nitro Express
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Aug 2004
    • 32798

    Barrack Obama's greatest accomplishment.

    In just two short years, Barrack Obama and the Democratic congress managed to raise the national debt from $10 Trillion to $13 Trillion. No other President and congress in US history have burned through that much money that fast. It's a not only a new US record but a world record for the greatest amount of debt caused in the least amount of time.
    No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!
  • ELVIS
    Banned
    • Dec 2003
    • 44120

    #2
    Yeah, but the USA is too big to fail...

    Comment

    • Seshmeister
      ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

      • Oct 2003
      • 35192

      #3
      How can you not blame Bush, it's just silly?

      Comment

      • ELVIS
        Banned
        • Dec 2003
        • 44120

        #4
        Blaming any one president is silly...

        Comment

        • Jagermeister
          Full Member Status

          • Apr 2010
          • 4510

          #5
          Originally posted by ELVIS
          Blaming any one president is silly...
          I'll tell you what's silly. The amount of time it takes to read a post here let alone reply to one.

          Comment

          • knuckleboner
            Crazy Ass Mofo
            • Jan 2004
            • 2927

            #6
            Originally posted by Nitro Express
            In just two short years, Barrack Obama and the Democratic congress managed to raise the national debt from $10 Trillion to $13 Trillion. No other President and congress in US history have burned through that much money that fast. It's a not only a new US record but a world record for the greatest amount of debt caused in the least amount of time.
            sesh is right. you know that the day bush left office, the deficit for that year was $1.2 trillion, right? you know that since mccain would NOT have proposed a balanced budget that year, that mccain would've hit $13 trillion almost as fast...within a couple of months, right?

            look, the issue is not whether republicans are bad and democrats good. both sides are culpable. but anybody who seeks to blame just one party is ignoring reality. and believe me, the REAL problem is that too many people, including those in power, are ignoring reality.

            Comment

            • Nickdfresh
              SUPER MODERATOR

              • Oct 2004
              • 49204

              #7
              Originally posted by Seshmeister
              How can you not blame Bush, it's just silly?
              Because it's the same cliche jackoff argument dummycons make to avoid responsibility for electing jackoffs that spend more than any predecessor, foster a culture of complete corporate unaccountability, and then cut taxes for the wealthy....

              Comment

              • Nitro Express
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Aug 2004
                • 32798

                #8
                Originally posted by Seshmeister
                How can you not blame Bush, it's just silly?
                Bush didn't run up a $3 Trillion dollar debt in just two years. The current Democrats have spent way more money than even the Bush neo-cons did in eight and that is saying something. To be fair, the spendaholism started with Johnson and Nixon took us off the gold standard so we could spend more. So both parties are to blame and yeah both will suck the tit dry.

                My main question is what happens when nobody wants Dollars, Yen, Euros, or Pounds anymore because they all are worthless paper money and nobody can pay China for the loans? China just printed a bunch of paper junk and loaned it to other worthless countries so they could keep the illusion going. It seems to be the country with the most slave labor is the winner in the modern world.
                No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                Comment

                • Nitro Express
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 32798

                  #9
                  Originally posted by knuckleboner
                  sesh is right. you know that the day bush left office, the deficit for that year was $1.2 trillion, right? you know that since mccain would NOT have proposed a balanced budget that year, that mccain would've hit $13 trillion almost as fast...within a couple of months, right?

                  look, the issue is not whether republicans are bad and democrats good. both sides are culpable. but anybody who seeks to blame just one party is ignoring reality. and believe me, the REAL problem is that too many people, including those in power, are ignoring reality.
                  McCain could have produced pornos starring Sarah and Bristol Palin and put the proceeds back into the budget. They could have also had Alaskan hunting and fishing trips that including night time sex romps for extra money.
                  No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                  Comment

                  • Nitro Express
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 32798

                    #10
                    Obama has nothing. Who wants to see Jo Biden in a porno? McCain had the greater asset.
                    No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                    Comment

                    • Terry
                      TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 11957

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nitro Express
                      Bush didn't run up a $3 Trillion dollar debt in just two years. The current Democrats have spent way more money than even the Bush neo-cons did in eight and that is saying something. To be fair, the spendaholism started with Johnson and Nixon took us off the gold standard so we could spend more. So both parties are to blame and yeah both will suck the tit dry.

                      My main question is what happens when nobody wants Dollars, Yen, Euros, or Pounds anymore because they all are worthless paper money and nobody can pay China for the loans? China just printed a bunch of paper junk and loaned it to other worthless countries so they could keep the illusion going. It seems to be the country with the most slave labor is the winner in the modern world.
                      What's China gonna do if the US can't pay them back?

                      China better pray the US doesn't collapse. Otherwise, who else is gonna buy all the crap China makes on as large a scale as the US does?
                      Scramby eggs and bacon.

                      Comment

                      • Nitro Express
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 32798

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Terry
                        What's China gonna do if the US can't pay them back?

                        China better pray the US doesn't collapse. Otherwise, who else is gonna buy all the crap China makes on as large a scale as the US does?
                        I guess China will have to pay their slaves more money so they can buy their own shit.
                        No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                        Comment

                        • Seshmeister
                          ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                          • Oct 2003
                          • 35192

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nitro Express
                          Obama has nothing. Who wants to see Jo Biden in a porno?
                          Most evangelist preachers...

                          Comment

                          • GAR
                            Banned
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 10871

                            #14
                            November 3 = watch the news first thing in the morning and celebrate with me when the losers are OUT>

                            Comment

                            • Nitro Express
                              DIAMOND STATUS
                              • Aug 2004
                              • 32798

                              #15
                              Originally posted by GAR
                              November 3 = watch the news first thing in the morning and celebrate with me when the losers are OUT>
                              Yeah but I felt that way for years but nobody any better replaces the former losers. In fact it's just gotten worse and worse and now the government is gunning for our asses more than ever before, the economy, the currency, and the debt situation are to levels nobody knows how they will be solved. Time magazine even said a civil war is not out of the picture due to all the problems.

                              The most we can hope for right now is to get enough people in the US House of Representatives to cut off the funding for Obamacare and hopefully keep Cap and Trade and Amnesty from being passed. Then get rid of Obama in 2012 but then what do we replace him with? So far it looks like Mitt Romney, Newt Gengrich, Sarah Palin, and Hillary Clinton might be candidates so far. Not much to choose from there.
                              No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                              Comment

                              Working...