PDA

View Full Version : Democratic Rep: Amend Constitution to Restrict Freedom of Speech



BigBadBrian
11-29-2012, 02:27 PM
Dem Rep: Amend Constitution to Restrict Freedom of Speech


Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) says, “corporations control the patterns of thinking” in the United States and that the Bill of Rights to the Constitution should be amended so that the government is given the power to restrict freedom of speech.

"We need a constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to control the so-called free speech rights of corporations," said Johnson.



“These corporations, along with the people they support, other millionaires who they’re putting into office, are stealing your government. They’re stealing the government and the U.S. Supreme Court was a big enabler with the Citizens United case,” Johnson said at the Annesbrooks HOA candidate Forum in Georgia in October.

“They control the patterns of thinking," said Johnson. "They control the media. They control the messages that you get. So, you are being taught to hate your government--don’t want government, but keep your hands off of my Medicare by the way. I mean, we are all confused people and we’re poking fingers at each other saying, well you’re black, you’re Hispanic, immigration, homosexuals. You know, we’re lost on the social issues, abortion, contraception.

“And these folks," Johnson said, "are setting up a scenario where they’re privatizing every aspect of our lives as we know it. So, wake up! Wake up! Let’s look at what’s happening. We need a constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to control the so-called free speech rights of corporations.”

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission is that corporations have a right to freedom of speech, including the right to speak about politicians and federal officeholders during an election year.
link (http://cnsnews.com/news/article/dem-rep-hank-johnson-amend-constitution-restrict-freedom-speech)

FORD
11-29-2012, 02:31 PM
Corporations are not people.
Money is not speech.
Ayn Rand was not a prophet.
Shittizens United is unconstitutional.
CNS is not news.

BigBadBrian
11-29-2012, 02:37 PM
CNS is not news.

Sure it is. You just don't like their message.

If Corporations shouldn't have Free Speech, neither should the Unions. And to be honest, NEITHER ONE should be allowed to make political donations.

Nickdfresh
11-29-2012, 04:25 PM
Sure it is. You just don't like their message.

If Corporations shouldn't have Free Speech, neither should the Unions. And to be honest, NEITHER ONE should be allowed to make political donations.

No shit! Who's arguing that either shouldn't have their donations restricted?

SunisinuS
11-29-2012, 09:19 PM
Sure it is. You just don't like their message.

If Corporations shouldn't have Free Speech, neither should the Unions. And to be honest, NEITHER ONE should be allowed to make political donations.

All all that money free speech still could not beat simple honest ideas.

Satan
11-29-2012, 11:29 PM
Sure it is. You just don't like their message.

If Corporations shouldn't have Free Speech, neither should the Unions. And to be honest, NEITHER ONE should be allowed to make political donations.

Brent BOZO (the Pat Robertson puppet/KKKoch shill who runs CNS) is currently trying to be another Grover Norquist and threaten any Repuke who doesn't protect billionaires "right" to dodge taxes. Saying that this asshole is a news reporter is like saying I'm still an angel.