Talibangelist nutcase begs God for a military fascist takeover of the USA

[FORD]

[VHscraps]

Well, a few seconds of that was enough to confirm that this was no relation to the UK media organ, the Morning Star* ...

* long-standing newspaper of the British Communist Party, or the Communist Party of Great Britain - or, wait a minute, was it the Communist Party of Britain (Marxist-Leninist) ...??

[ELVIS]

He's not too far off...

But why cut him off and out of context ??

[ELVIS]

This clip is much more idiotic...

<embed src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" background="#333333" width="425" height="279" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" FlashVars="si=254&contentValue=50156297&shareUrl=h ttp://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57605670/intel-chief-shutdown-threatens-national-security/" />

[FORD]

What possible "context" could you apply to that insanity that would make it sound any better?

He clearly wants the constitutionally elected government of this nation overthrown by a military dictatorship with martial law.

How the fuck can you spin that to ANY sort of "positive"??

Isn't this the very thing that Alex Jones has been so paranoid about for several years?

[ELVIS]

What possible "context" could you apply to that insanity that would make it sound any better?

He clearly wants the constitutionally elected government of this nation overthrown by a military dictatorship with martial law.

How the fuck can you spin that to ANY sort of "positive"??

Isn't this the very thing that Alex Jones has been so paranoid about for several years?

Show me the entire message...

[FORD]

If you want to hear this asshat Joyner explain himself tune into Thom Hartmann right now, as he's going to be on the show in about 4 minutes.

Click on the Progressive Voices link in my signature (or "check your local listings")

[FORD]

Well... Joyner pretty much denied having said what he said, and then when Thom played the audio again, he dodged the question, and went off on his vague critique of "everything since 1987". (Ummm... your're about 6 years late on that, Ricky).

I'll post it later if Thom puts it up on YouTube (as he does with a lot of his radio interviews)

[FORD]