9/11 Commission: U.S. Terror War has Stymied al Qaida

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Ashcroft
    Veteran
    • Jan 2004
    • 2127

    9/11 Commission: U.S. Terror War has Stymied al Qaida

    The Sept. 11 Commission has found that the Bush administration's war on terror has severely impaired al Qaida's ability to organize another spectacular attack against the U.S. homeland by capturing or killing the deadly terror group's key leaders, drying up their financial resources and severely limiting their ability to "strategize, plan attacks, and dispatch operatives worldwide."

    The bombshell finding, buried at the end of the Commission's Staff Statement No. 15, should have been hailed in the press as evidence that we've at least turned the corner in the war on terror - and may indeed have the enemy on the run. Instead, reporters have ignored this particular Commission finding since its release on June 16.

    Here's the part of Staff Statement 15 that the press decided Americans didn't need to hear about, as reported by the Commission under the heading "Al Qaeda* Today."
    "Since the September 11 attacks and the defeat of the Taliban, as Qaeda's funding has decreased significantly. The arrests or deaths of several important financial facilitators have decreased the amount of money al Qaeda has raised and increased the costs and difficulty of raising and moving that money.

    "Some entirely corrupt charities are now out of business, with many of their principals killed or captured, although some charities may still be providing support to al Qaeda.

    "Moreover, it appears that the al Qaeda attacks within Saudi Arabia in May and November 2003 have reduced - perhaps drastically - at Qaeda's ability to raise funds from Saudi sources. Both an increase in Saudi enforcement and a more negative perception of al Qaeda by potential donors have cut its income."


    And the good news for America - not to mention the Bush administration - doesn't end there. In the same section, Staff Statement 15 notes:

    "Prior to 9/11, al Qaeda was a centralized organization which used Afghanistan as a war room to strategize, plan attacks, and dispatch operatives worldwide." But now, says the Commission, "Bin Ladin's* seclusion [has] forced operational commanders and cell leaders to assume greater authority; they are now making the command decisions previously made by him."

    In other words, whether dead or alive, the prime mover behind the Sept. 11 attacks has been taken out of commission, with operational authority handed over to allies of convenience like Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

    And while Zarqawi has mounted dozens of operations throughout the Middle East in recent months, including a deadly chem-bomb plot foiled by Jordanian authorities in April, his focus these days seems to be pretty much on Iraq - not America.

    And even there, Zarqawi seems to be feeling the heat lately. According to the recent communique he sent to bin Laden, published on Islamic web sites earlier this month, he complained about being "squeezed" by U.S. forces.

    "The space of movement is starting to get smaller," he told the 9/11 chief. "The [U.S.] grip is starting to be tightened on the holy warriors' necks and, with the spread of soldiers and police, the future [for our side] is becoming frightening."

    Your damned right!

    To be sure, the 9/11 Commission did not attribute any success in the terror war to the president by name, though as its leader and chief strategist, that conclusion is inescapable.

    And neither does Staff Statement 15 say that al Qaeda has been completely vanquished, warning instead that the bin Laden network is still able to execute smaller operations and is "striving to attack the U.S. and inflict mass casualties" - using nuclear weapons if possible.

    Still, when the 9/11 Commission reports: "Al Qaeda today is more a loose collection of regional networks with a greatly weakened central organization," it's hard not to conclude President Bush's war on terror is making significant progress.

    Unless you're a journalist.

    Link: More bad news for Dems
  • Pink Spider
    Sniper
    • Jan 2004
    • 867

    #2
    So, the war on terror has prevented more terrrorism, right?



    The Associated Press
    Updated: 8:59 p.m. ET June 22, 2004

    WASHINGTON - Correcting an inaccurate report, the State Department announced Tuesday that acts of terror worldwide increased slightly last year and the number of people wounded rose dramatically.

    The department also reported a decline in the number of people killed — to 625 from 725 during 2002. But in April, the department reported 307 people had been killed last year — a much bigger decline.

    “The numbers were off,” Secretary of State Colin Powell said, and “we have identified how we have to do this in the future.” He also said the initial report was not designed “to make our efforts look better or worse.”

    The findings had been used by senior Bush administration officials to bolster President Bush’s claim of success in countering terrorism.

    Responding to the corrected version, Phil Singer, spokesman for Sen. John Kerry’s presidential campaign, said it was “just the latest example of an administration playing fast and loose with the truth when it comes to the war on terror.” The administration “has now been caught trying to inflate its success on terrorism,” he said.

    Initially, 190 acts of terror were reported in 2003, a slight decrease from the 198 attacks reported for 2002. On Tuesday, the State Department said there were 208 acts of terror last year, a slight increase from 2002.

    Thirty-five U.S. citizens died in international terror attacks last year. The deadliest incident was a suicide bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in May in which nine Americans were killed.

    The report did not include U.S. troops killed or wounded in Iraq, or the incidents there, in its report “because they were directed at combatants.” Attacks against civilians and unarmed military personnel were included.

    A total of 3,646 people were wounded worldwide in terror attacks last year, the report said. This represented a sharp increase from the 2,013 wounded in 2002.

    In April, the department had said that 1,593 people were wounded in 2003, a sharp decline from the previous year.

    The initial report was issued April 28. On June 10, the State Department acknowledged the findings were inaccurate. Powell attributed the errors partly to a new data system and said there was no attempt to manipulate the figures to buttress Bush’s argument.



    When the report was issued, senior administration officials claimed that it showed Bush’s counter-terror campaign was a success.

    State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the report was based “on the facts as we had them at the time. The facts that we had were wrong.”

    The April report said attacks had declined last year to 190, down from 198 in 2002 and 346 in 2001. The 2003 figure would have been the lowest level in 34 years and a 45 percent drop since 2001, Bush’s first year as president. The department is now working to determine the correct figures.

    Democratic Rep. Henry A. Waxman of California had challenged the initial findings. He said he was pleased that officials “have now recognized that they have a report that has been inaccurate, and based on the inaccurate information they tried to take self-serving political credit for the results that were wrong.”

    But Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., was sharply critical on Tuesday.

    “Funny things happened on the way to the printer,” he said. “Unfortunately, this is not the first, second, or third instance, for that matter, of a Bush Cabinet secretary having to rewrite a report from their own department.”

    Emanuel cited inaccurate reports on racial disparities in health care, misleading estimates of the Medicare prescription drug bill and the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed mercury emissions rules.

    “The first draft reflects the administration’s ideology and political objectives and the rewrite reflects the facts,” Emanuel said in a House speech.

    And Raphael Perl, a terrorism analyst for the Congressional Research Service, said “the numbers add up.”

    But, he said, “there is no doubt that the credibility has been damaged, but the administration has come out clean and hopefully has rehabilitated the report.”

    Among the mistakes, Boucher said, was that only part of 2003 was taken into account.

    Powell said, “I can assure you it had nothing to do with putting out anything but the most honest, accurate information we can.”

    “Errors crept in that, frankly, we did not catch here,” Powell said. The report showed both a drop in the number of attacks worldwide in 2003 and the virtual disappearance of attacks in which no one died.

    Comment

    • John Ashcroft
      Veteran
      • Jan 2004
      • 2127

      #3
      Yep, but how many attacks have we had on American property?

      And, I'm assuming you've got a point here somewhere... Oh yeah, that's right! You blame the Bush administration for terrorism, not the terrorists themselves. I almost forgot.

      Comment

      • VanJay011379
        Roadie
        • Jan 2004
        • 172

        #4
        Originally posted by John Ashcroft
        Yep, but how many attacks have we had on American property?

        And, I'm assuming you've got a point here somewhere... Oh yeah, that's right! You blame the Bush administration for terrorism, not the terrorists themselves. I almost forgot.
        Insert BCE accusation here.

        Comment

        • Pink Spider
          Sniper
          • Jan 2004
          • 867

          #5
          Originally posted by John Ashcroft
          And, I'm assuming you've got a point here somewhere... Oh yeah, that's right! You blame the Bush administration for terrorism, not the terrorists themselves. I almost forgot.
          Oh, but I do blame the terrorists. Just because they have a leader that's a former CIA asset, doesn't mean that I don't put at least part of the blame on them. And just because that leader has more connections than a switchboard to the Bush family doesn't mean I blame just Bush.

          We can't leave the feds out that get triple funding after every attack on US soil.

          There's lots of blame to go around.

          Comment

          • FORD
            ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

            • Jan 2004
            • 58754

            #6
            Originally posted by John Ashcroft
            Yep, but how many attacks have we had on American property?

            It's been just under three years. The last attack on US soil before that was the previous WTC bombing in 1993. Using the BCE's "logic", Clinton kept the country free from foreign terrorism a lot longer than Junior did. And unlike Junior, the Clinton administration successfully arrested, prosecuted, and convicted the guys who committed that crime.
            Eat Us And Smile

            Cenk For America 2024!!

            Justice Democrats


            "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

            Comment

            • VanJay011379
              Roadie
              • Jan 2004
              • 172

              #7
              Originally posted by FORD
              It's been just under three years. The last attack on US soil before that was the previous WTC bombing in 1993. Using the BCE's "logic", Clinton kept the country free from foreign terrorism a lot longer than Junior did. And unlike Junior, the Clinton administration successfully arrested, prosecuted, and convicted the guys who committed that crime.
              Basically Clinton gave Al-Queda a smack on the ass. A lot of good his "arrested, prosecuted, and convicted the guys" did.

              Comment

              • FORD
                ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                • Jan 2004
                • 58754

                #8
                Originally posted by VanJay011379
                Basically Clinton gave Al-Queda a smack on the ass. A lot of good his "arrested, prosecuted, and convicted the guys" did.
                And how many convictions does the BCE have from 9-11-01?

                **crickets chirping**
                Eat Us And Smile

                Cenk For America 2024!!

                Justice Democrats


                "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                Comment

                • Warham
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 14589

                  #9
                  Actually, how could they have convictions?

                  The fucking guys that blew up the buildings were killed with the other 3,000 innocent people. Alot easier to catch and convict somebody when they aren't dead.

                  Comment

                  • wraytw

                    #10
                    Sure, FORD. How convenient of you to leave out the fact that Clinton had three opportunities from Sudan to arrest bin Laden and extradite him to the U.S., but he turned them down all three times.

                    Comment

                    • John Ashcroft
                      Veteran
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 2127

                      #11
                      Now Ford, let's not pretend that you don't know that U.S. embassies are considered U.S. soil (as is a naval vessel).

                      Comment

                      • FORD
                        ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                        • Jan 2004
                        • 58754

                        #12
                        Eat Us And Smile

                        Cenk For America 2024!!

                        Justice Democrats


                        "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                        Comment

                        • John Ashcroft
                          Veteran
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 2127

                          #13
                          Heh heh heh... That's just about the stupidest thing I've ever read. "He kicks our asses and kills as many of us as possible... Therefore he must be reelected! Kerry's the one who really scares us! He always uses terms like "IIIIII Condeeeemmmmm thiiiiiiis teeeeerorist aaaaaact wiiiiith the strooooongest poooosible laaanguage"

                          Yep, that strikes fear into the hearts of many a terrorist!

                          Comment

                          • Wayne L.

                            #14
                            You know the 9/11 Comission is just for show & tell to begin with when it says the war on terror has slightly crippled Al Qaida which shouldn't be a shock to most people except the ignorant.

                            Comment

                            Working...