How a fake doctor made millions from ‘the Dr. Oz Effect’ and a bogus weight-loss supp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Seshmeister
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    • Oct 2003
    • 35163

    How a fake doctor made millions from ‘the Dr. Oz Effect’ and a bogus weight-loss supp




    By Abby Phillip January 28


    When Lindsey Duncan appeared on “The Dr. Oz Show” in 2012, he was introduced as a “naturopathic doctor” and a certified nutritionist. Lindsey prefers to use the term “celebrity nutritionist,” but that didn’t really matter, because he was there to tout the green coffee bean extract, a “new” supplement that, he claimed, “the medical community, the weight-loss community” was all buzzing about.

    But Duncan wouldn’t necessarily know anything about the chatter in the medical community, because he is no doctor.

    In announcing a $9 million settlement with Duncan this week, the Federal Trade Commission more accurately labeled him a “marketer” who skillfully manipulated the so-called “Oz Effect” to sell a bogus product that he claimed resulted in unbelievable weight loss results.

    The settlement comes just a few months after the Texas attorney general charged Duncan with deceiving the public for purporting to be a naturopathic doctor. Duncan, the state charged, used a degree from a now-defunct and uncredited “distance-learning” natural health college whose degrees are illegal to use in Texas.

    In reality, Duncan was a marketing executive of two companies, Genesis Today and Pure Health, which advertised and sold green coffee bean extract. Their moneymaking scheme, however, was only possible with the help of Mehmet Oz’s increasingly maligned self-help show.


    Dr. Oz’s medical advice show helped one Texas quack make millions (Brian Ach/Getty Images for iHeartMedia)
    “We are working on a segment about the weight loss benefits of green coffee bean and I was hoping that Lindsey Duncan might be available to be our expert,” wrote one of Oz’s producers in an April 12 e-mail to Duncan’s staff. “Has he studied green coffee bean at all? Would he be able to talk about how it works?”

    In fact, Duncan didn’t know anything about green coffee bean extract prior to receiving the e-mail, but a member of his team eagerly agreed that he would appear on the show. “Awesome! Thanks for reaching out, Dr. Lindsey does have knowledge of the Green Coffee Bean. He loves it!” came the reply a few hours later, according to court documents in the case.

    The operation then sprang into action. That same day, Duncan’s staff contacted the manufacturer and placed a wholesale order for green coffee bean extract so that they could begin producing and selling the product.

    [Dr. Oz solicits health questions on Twitter, gets attacked by trolls instead]


    As Duncan prepared for the show’s taping, his staff made sure to insert lines in the script specifying exactly how much of the extract people should take in order to lose weight. They also inserted lines instructing viewers to find the extract online by searching for “Pure Green Coffee Bean Capsules” – a search term they would later use to direct people to Web sites where they sold the extract, according to documents.

    During the taping, Dr. Oz nodded along with Duncan’s pseudoscience gibberish, according to a transcript that was included in court documents.
    Dr. Oz: So, how does it work?

    Duncan: Well, it’s amazing. It’s what we call the triple threat. Okay, and it’s the chlorogenic acid that causes the effect, and it works three ways. The first way is it goes in and it causes the body to burn glucose or sugar and burn fat, mainly in the liver. The second way, and the most important way, is it slows the release of sugar into the bloodstream, so when you don’t have sugar building up in the bloodstream you don’t have fat building up because sugar turns to fat. And everybody must remember that.

    Dr. Oz: Right.
    Wrong.

    There was then, and there is now, no scientific evidence that green coffee bean extract promotes weight loss.

    The FTC has been on the trail of the weight-loss scam for months. The agency’s actions have so far has resulted in the retraction of a bogus scientific study claiming that green coffee bean extract promotes unbelievable weight loss results with no diet and exercise, and a $3.5 million settlement against the company that manufactured the supplement.

    Now comes the biggest settlement of all: The $9 million case against Duncan and his companies, which the FTC said made “millions” off green coffee bean extract thanks to a steroid shot of publicity from Dr. Oz.

    Between the taping and the time the show aired, Oz’s producers e-mailed Duncan to ask whether he had a preferred green coffee extract supplier.

    Why yes, in fact, he did!

    “This is either a set up or manna from the heavens,” Duncan e-mailed to his staff, which attempted to conceal his connection to the company from consumers and from the Oz show, according to documents. “Please get Green Coffee Bean up on our site immediately!!!”

    The staff pointed Oz’s producers to www.purehealth100.com, a site they had created to sell the green coffee bean extract product they had just started to manufacture. They quickly executed a strategy to pump up the search value for their site by purchasing Google Adwords and setting up “fake” sites that led consumers back to their company.


    Then, touting the supplement’s appearance on “The Dr. Oz Show,” Duncan’s companies began pitching the product to retailers including Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club.

    “We just left a taping at the Dr. Oz show today, and Dr. Lindsey unveiled a new supplement that millions of Americans are going to want when this show airs in 2 weeks, and we have a product developed and ready to produce for Dept. 82 at Walmart,” one of Duncan’s employees e-mailed to a Wal-Mart representative. “You are probably aware of the ‘Oz Effect,’ this will be the Oz Effect on steroids!”

    The accusations go on and on.

    [Half of Dr. Oz’s medical advice is baseless or wrong, study says]

    As the last several months of FTC actions and this most recent cache of documents have revealed a cottage industry that grew and thrived thanks to Oz’s dubious endorsements.

    “Lindsey Duncan and his companies made millions by falsely claiming that green coffee bean supplements cause significant and rapid weight loss,” Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. “This case shows that the Federal Trade Commission will continue to fight deceptive marketers’ attempts to prey on consumers trying to improve their health.”

    Duncan and his companies have been ordered to pay $5 million within two weeks of the court’s approval. The order also requires Duncan and his companies to substantiate any weight-loss claims in the future with at least two “well-controlled” human clinical trials — and it bans them from making false claims about the benefits of a product by claiming that they are scientifically proven when, in fact, they are not.

    Meanwhile, “The Dr. Oz Show” is still on the air, despite his association with numerous debunked weight-loss products. A recent study found that half of the medical advice he dispenses is baseless or wrong.




    And Oz has recently began clearing some of the biggest offenders — including green coffee bean extract — from his Web site, in the midst of the glut of negative attention.


    Yet instead of issuing an apology to his viewers, Oz has attributed to the dust-up to the whims of “science.”

    “In prior seasons, we covered Green Coffee Extract and its potential as a useful tool for weight loss,” a statement on Oz’s site reads. “Recently the authors of the peer reviewed research paper on which our coverage had been partially based formally retracted their study. While this sometimes happens in scientific research, it indicates that further study is needed regarding any potential benefits of Green Coffee Extract.”
    Last edited by Seshmeister; 02-01-2015, 05:42 PM.
  • twonabomber
    formerly F A T
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    • Jan 2004
    • 11191

    #2
    Oprah is responsible for bringing us two frauds, "Dr's" Phil and Oz, and she should be punished.
    Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

    Comment

    • Nickdfresh
      SUPER MODERATOR

      • Oct 2004
      • 49137

      #3
      Go ahead and ask Dr. Oz a question on Twitter.


      Freddie Fit @evilcybercom
      Follow

      Dear Dr. Oz, at what point today did you realize that the Twitter demographic is different from your show's regular audience? #OzsInbox
      8:19 PM - 12 Nov 2014
      65 Retweets 148 favorites
      Last edited by Nickdfresh; 02-01-2015, 09:08 PM.

      Comment

      • Kristy
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Aug 2004
        • 16338

        #4
        Thanks again, Professor WikiNick:

        Comment

        • dazzlindino
          Head Fluffer
          • Jul 2009
          • 311

          #5
          Originally posted by twonabomber
          Oprah is responsible for bringing us two frauds, "Dr's" Phil and Oz, and she should be punished.
          Seems sharpton should be all over this white dr thingy.....what...opah cant find no black drs'...
          I want my music waking up the dead.....dont tell me to turn it down

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49137

            #6
            Originally posted by Kristy
            Thanks again, Professor WikiNick:
            Who pissed in your kale and green coffee this morning?

            Comment

            • FORD
              ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

              • Jan 2004
              • 58760

              #7
              Originally posted by twonabomber
              Oprah is responsible for bringing us two frauds, "Dr's" Phil and Oz, and she should be punished.
              Well, to be fair, Oz is a real doctor. Actually he's a cardiac surgeon. But nobody who watches daytime TV is going to watch a guy cutting somebody's chest open for an hour every day, so he had to come up with something else to talk about.
              Eat Us And Smile

              Cenk For America 2024!!

              Justice Democrats


              "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

              Comment

              • Kristy
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Aug 2004
                • 16338

                #8
                Nick Wiki's insults. Sad.

                Comment

                • Seshmeister
                  ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                  • Oct 2003
                  • 35163

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FORD
                  Well, to be fair, Oz is a real doctor. Actually he's a cardiac surgeon.
                  That makes it worse for me. That means he knows he's fucking conning people.

                  Comment

                  • twonabomber
                    formerly F A T
                    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                    • Jan 2004
                    • 11191

                    #10
                    Originally posted by FORD
                    Well, to be fair, Oz is a real doctor. Actually he's a cardiac surgeon. But nobody who watches daytime TV is going to watch a guy cutting somebody's chest open for an hour every day, so he had to come up with something else to talk about.
                    and

                    [Half of Dr. Oz’s medical advice is baseless or wrong, study says]
                    Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

                    Comment

                    • Seshmeister
                      ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                      • Oct 2003
                      • 35163

                      #11
                      They set the bar low too, here's the link to the research paper in the British Medical Journal.

                      Objective To determine the quality of health recommendations and claims made on popular medical talk shows. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Mainstream television media. Sources Internationally syndicated medical television talk shows that air daily ( The Dr Oz Show and The Doctors ). Interventions Investigators randomly selected 40 episodes of each of The Dr Oz Show and The Doctors from early 2013 and identified and evaluated all recommendations made on each program. A group of experienced evidence reviewers independently searched for, and evaluated as a team, evidence to support 80 randomly selected recommendations from each show. Main outcomes measures Percentage of recommendations that are supported by evidence as determined by a team of experienced evidence reviewers. Secondary outcomes included topics discussed, the number of recommendations made on the shows, and the types and details of recommendations that were made. Results We could find at least a case study or better evidence to support 54% (95% confidence interval 47% to 62%) of the 160 recommendations (80 from each show). For recommendations in The Dr Oz Show , evidence supported 46%, contradicted 15%, and was not found for 39%. For recommendations in The Doctors , evidence supported 63%, contradicted 14%, and was not found for 24%. Believable or somewhat believable evidence supported 33% of the recommendations on The Dr Oz Show and 53% on The Doctors . On average, The Dr Oz Show had 12 recommendations per episode and The Doctors 11. The most common recommendation category on The Dr Oz Show was dietary advice (39%) and on The Doctors was to consult a healthcare provider (18%). A specific benefit was described for 43% and 41% of the recommendations made on the shows respectively. The magnitude of benefit was described for 17% of the recommendations on The Dr Oz Show and 11% on The Doctors . Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest accompanied 0.4% of recommendations. Conclusions Recommendations made on medical talk shows often lack adequate information on specific benefits or the magnitude of the effects of these benefits. Approximately half of the recommendations have either no evidence or are contradicted by the best available evidence. Potential conflicts of interest are rarely addressed. The public should be skeptical about recommendations made on medical talk shows. Additional details of methods used and changes made to study protocol



                      For recommendations in The Dr Oz Show, evidence supported 46%, contradicted 15%, and was not found for 39%. Believable or somewhat believable evidence supported 33% of the recommendations on The Dr Oz Show.
                      I wouldn't base my medical decisions on only 'somewhat believable' evidence.

                      Comment

                      • ELVIS
                        Banned
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 44120

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Seshmeister
                        That means he knows he's fucking conning people.
                        Takes one to know one...

                        Comment

                        • Kristy
                          DIAMOND STATUS
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 16338

                          #13
                          Astonishing! A topic about doctors who bullshit. Oz(one) and his dismal show appeal to the masses via bullshit. So green coffee beans don't make one lose wight but rather gain it in terms of bank about augments. Anyone, and I mean anyone who tries to push herbal supplements or some fucked up derivative of is a carnival barker looking for fools. Problem with that shit is the lack of empirical scientific study and residual harm they may bring in terms of nephrotoxity, hepatoxity, carcinogenicity and behavioral changes.

                          Oh, but what's that that you say? Wouldn't that be more "governmental intrusion" on what I can do with my body?

                          1. Fuck you

                          and

                          2. Yes.


                          I'll tell you takers of this shit what: keep your religion, misogyny, and "men's rights" out of my womb and I'll politely shut the fuck up about those being complete fucking idiots who pop supplements like the F A T kid at the candy section of the 7-11.


                          "Fuck you, Kristy. This is not a feminist issue."


                          Yes, I suppose but quit rehashing Oz(one) and his con game. I seriously wonder if he could not hack it as a heart surgeon or that his colleagues think he's such a prick that he's been blacklisted from performing at most major hospitals for fear of litigation reprisal. Who gives a shit? Personally, the man makes me sick with his smug infomercial sales pitches and designer scrubs. Oz(one) strikes me as a sociopath who preys on the gullibility of women and fuck them for allowing this asshole to flourish.

                          "Made from my own feces, used antifreeze, and Kyrptonite. It even has a 'new age' name. Buy it today you fucking idiots."
                          Last edited by Kristy; 02-03-2015, 12:45 PM.

                          Comment

                          • Kristy
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 16338

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ELVIS
                            Takes one to know one...

                            Comment

                            • ELVIS
                              Banned
                              • Dec 2003
                              • 44120

                              #15
                              No social worker school today, loser ??

                              Comment

                              Working...