Tweet
I love ELO, imo they are way better than the beatles.
-
-
And in case you missed the first one a month ago
-
I dunno. I've always felt ELO was just Jeff Lynne and some sidemen.
Those two tracks are kind of meh. They remind me a lot more of Lynne's work with George Harrison than original ELO.Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.Comment
-
Jeff Lynne always wanted to BE a Beatle, so claiming his "band" (using the term loosely) was better than the Beatles is a bit ridiculous.
Of course when Lynne actually had an opportunity to work with the actual Beatles, the results weren't all that great either. Meaning those two "new" songs on the Anthology albums, which sounded more like "Travelling Willburys with a canned John Lennon vocal"
The actual Willbury records were better, but that's because George Harrison, Bob Dylan, and Tom Petty were there to keep Lynne from completely dominating the project.Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992Comment
Comment