POSTED 11:18 a.m. EST, December 31, 2005
COLLINS MUST GO
In response to an excellent article from Patrick McManamon of The Akron Beacon Journal regarding the events from Friday that nearly claimed the position of Browns G.M. Phil Savage (and still might), we've parsed through the quotes from team President/CEO John Collins, and we've concluded, based on all of the information we have collected from our network of sources, that Collins has exposed himself as a complete fraud, and that owner Randy Lerner needs to fire him.
Now.
Let's take a look at Collins' words, and their likely import.
"I would think [Savage] would want to be here,'' Collins said Friday night. "I would really be as surprised as I was today if he came in when we get together on Monday and said, 'I've rethought this.'"
Translation: Something is indeed happening that has caused Savage to at least raise the possibility of walking away. And as we've heard from multiple sources (and as McManamon reports) that "something" came to a head with the under-the-radar hiring by Collins of Mike Keenan to manage the salary cap, a function falling exclusively within Savage's purview.
Regarding Collins' confirmation that Keenan will be joining the team, the more important question Collins didn't address is why the whole thing was done on such a top-secret basis? We've heard that Keenan already has resigned his position with the league and accepted a job with the Browns, but there was no announcement of any kind regarding the move. The inference we (and others) are drawing is that Savage wasn't consulted and didn't know that Keenan was coming aboard.
Collins justifies the move by saying that "Phil needs help." But didn't they know this when they hired him? And doesn't the same observation apply to Collins, who never worked in any capacity with a football team before becoming President of the Browns?
Let's be clear on this. Collins has worked in marketing. He never worked for the Management Council, never in player personnel, never anywhere close to anything dealing with anyone in football operations, and now he's in charge of helping the owner decide, judge, and critique how the football operation should be staffed and run.
He doesn't know what he doesn't know, and that's the biggest flaw for anyone who's trying to run a football team.
Instead, Collins is a marketing guy with the gift of gab and all the substance of a balsa wood baseball bat. It's no wonder he's seduced the owner.
Collins started working for the Browns on May 1, 2004, and less than a year later he was involved in and suggesting to Randy Lerner who should be running a football operation and after a full 19 months of working on the job, he knows more about football operations, coaches, scouting, players, the salary cap, football staffing, etc. than Phil Savage, who has been in the football side of the business for 16 years.
Regarding the notion that Savage was meticulous in the wording of his contract regarding salary cap responsibilities, our understanding is that Savage had to be meticulous, because everyone suspected that Collins would try to pull something like this if Savage didn't get his authority and responsibility in writing.
So what we have here, in our opinion, is a new level of asshole. At least other guys who have risen to power in football organizations despite having no football knowledge had fancy degrees or proven success in some other field of business -- Collins has merely marketed his way into becoming the right hand man of an NFL owner, and already is the most powerful man in the organization.
How did this happen, you ask? Our understanding is that a small group of league office personnel and owners lobbied Lerner to hire Collins at a time when the league office was looking for a way to ease Collins out, following the Janet Jackson Super Bowl boob flap. Lerner ended up taking to Collins more enthusiastically than expected, and other owners (who want to be helpful but not too helpful to their competitors) didn't tell Lerner that maybe Collins shouldn't be given such a key role so soon.
And now Collins is trying to build his power. He's hiring guys like Keenan not to "help" Savage, but to undermine him and, in the end, push him out.
Why? In our view, which is based on the various conversations we've had over the past couple of days with folks in the know, Collins doesn't think that Savage knows his place, and Collins wants to replace him with someone who will submit to Collins' growing authority over the team -- even though Collins has no clue as to how to wield it.
Given Randy Lerner's quick efforts to throw water on the Savage flap once fans began to react negatively to the news that he was being squeezed out, Collins' bigger concern in the short term shouldn't be whether he can finish the job on Savage, but whether a "Fire Collins" movement will erupt in Cleveland -- which would make the whole "Fire Millen" thing in Motown look like a tea party at a home for the deaf and blind.
POSTED 12:15 a.m. EST, December 31, 2005
CLUSTERFUDGE IN CLEVELAND
One of the most bizarre days in the history of the Browns organization could lead to more goofiness long before normalcy ever returns to Cuyahoga County's football franchise.
On Friday morning, we heard from multiple league insiders who were aware of looming problems between Browns G.M. Phil Savage and President/CEO John Collins. One source told us that Savage believed that Collins was trying to run him out the door. Another source was more specific, explaining that Collins had hired NFL in-house counsel Mike Keenan to take over the cap management functions in Cleveland -- without the blessing or knowledge of Savage, whose jurisdiction as G.M. includes all matters relating to the salary cap.
The Keenan hiring appeared at best to be a shot across the bow at Savage, and at worst a direct attempt to undermine Savage and his current cap guy, Trip MacCracken. Per the grapevine, it looked like Savage's stay in Cleveland could be a short one.
So we posted a story outlining what we had heard. Several hours later, ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported that the Browns planned to fire Savage, and that an announcement of the move could be made as soon as Friday.
Then the rumor mill really kicked into high gear. We heard that Falcons exec Ray Anderson was a candidate to join the team (although at least one industry source told us that Anderson will be staying in Atlanta). We also heard that Collins was poised to become the CEO of all of Browns owner Randy Lerner's business interests.
Later, we heard that Collins himself was planning to become the "football guy" in the front office after Savage was gone, despite the fact that he has no experience whatsoever evaluating football talent and that his only prior claim to fame is being the guy who ultimately was responsible within the NFL for the exhibition of Janet Jackson's breast to a Super Bowl halftime audience.
Finally, the Browns chimed in on the situation, stating that Savage will not be fired. "Although it is our policy not to respond to rumors, in fairness to our fans, we felt it necessary to dispel them," Browns president and chief executive officer John Collins said. "It was unfortunate and very unfair to the organization and especially to our fans, but we are happy to put this behind us and focus on our game this Sunday and the busy offseason ahead."
So what really happened here? One league source tells us that once Lerner heard the news -- and once coach Romeo Crennel made his preference known that he wants Savage to stay -- the boss man clunked together the heads of Collins and Savage and told them to kiss and make up.
Meanwhile, Mortensen is reporting that Savage might end up in a reduced role, with the salary cap management removed from his authority.
In our view, it could be that Lerner's bungling of the Butch Davis situation, in which the former head coach got his coveted ticket out of town along with a full buyout, might have emboldened Savage to try to force the organization's hand.
As a result, one of the theories making the rounds as of late Friday/early Saturday is that Collins and Savage have indeed reached rock bottom in their relationship, and that Savage (through agent Neil Cornrich) attempted to provoke a termination, which would then have enabled Savage and Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz (another Cornrich client and a close friend of Savage) to partner up in a new city for 2006.
If true, it appears that Savage and Cornrich might have played their hand too early. Still, the status quo is unacceptable; Savage and Collins don't like each other, and they can't work together moving forward. So perhaps the statement that Savage won't be fired represents an effort by the team to force Savage to leave. The hiring of Keenan, we're told, constitutes a breach of Savage's contract, which arguably would permit him to walk away without consequence.
But also without a buyout.
In the end, it's possible that the relationship is permanently fractured, and that it's merely a matter of semantics from this point forward. After being burned by Davis in 2004, we'd like to think that Lerner will play this one a little more astutely, in the hopes of not cutting any more big checks to guys who don't work for him anymore.
Regardless of how it all turns out in the short term, we're confident that things will be a mess in Cleveland until either Savage or Collins is out of the organization. And the best move, based on the overwhelming input we've received from league insiders throughout Friday, would be for Lerner to get rid of Collins.
Comment