Official Presidential Debate Thread - Live TYT coverage

[Nickdfresh]

.. I felt the ruling was quite narrow and didn't expand immunity of the executive branch in the ways many are depicting it...
.

Oh is that your feeling? Oh okay, except almost every legal scholar not working for the Heritage Foundation or bringing election denial lawsuits will tell you the exact opposite....

[ZahZoo]

Only if you keep electing crooks.

Seems somewhat relevant... LOL

[ZahZoo]

Oh is that your feeling? Oh okay, except almost every legal scholar not working for the Heritage Foundation or bringing election denial lawsuits will tell you the exact opposite....

Really..? Almost every one of em..?

Well shit, it's comforting to know there must be a few that saw it my way and heck I ain't no legal scholar... just an old fart with an opinion!

[Seshmeister]

Seems somewhat relevant... LOL

The legal thinking is that under the new ruling Nixon wouldn't be able to be prosecuted.

The real issue is that back then Republican's forced him out in the same way that Boris Johnson was here a couple of years ago.

That no longer happens. If you remember the reason given for Republican senators not impeaching Trump was that it should be dealt with in the courts - a circular con relying on peoples short term memory.

[FORD]

Here's the full interview with Snuffleupagus. Not exactly the most convincing argument to keep Joe on the ticket....

[Jesus Christ]

Hey Joe.... I usually don't work on Saturdays, but since ye asked.....

The Lord Almighty is officially telling you to take the Amtrak back to Scranton and spendeth some time with thy grandkids.

[FORD]

[Seshmeister]

Is this the one where he says he was the first black woman VP? :D

Thing is though that for some reason Trump seems to get a 'yeah but it's Trump'' pass when he talks also geriatric shit

Seems to me that your candidate is very probably Biden but if even if it isn't then it's Kamala who I'm told everyone hates anyway so it's not looking great.

[Nickdfresh]

Really..? Almost every one of em..?

Well shit, it's comforting to know there must be a few that saw it my way and heck I ain't no legal scholar... just an old fart with an opinion!

Yeah, the Fox News one. GrandMahZ9oo will rely on them for this thoughts and votes.......

[ZahZoo]

The legal thinking is that under the new ruling Nixon wouldn't be able to be prosecuted.

The real issue is that back then Republican's forced him out in the same way that Boris Johnson was here a couple of years ago.

That no longer happens. If you remember the reason given for Republican senators not impeaching Trump was that it should be dealt with in the courts - a circular con relying on peoples short term memory.

I was in high school when all that played out with Nixon. Back then there's seemed to be a higher sense of honor or perceived integrity... even though, just as much lying and shady shit went on behind the scenes as it does today. I don't believe Nixon would get a pass today for the same crap under the recent SCOTUS ruling. It didn't fall under the "official" acts element.

[FORD]

TYT doesn't usually do weekends. Cenk seems convinced that it's Joever.....

https://www.youtube.com/live/VxJUVPdFfBc?si=sRly9EgHxBCE6HS7

[Nickdfresh]

[FORD]

[Seshmeister]

The thing about fact checks is that when it comes to January 6th you will never get to the bottom of the National guard issue. Interesting article here:

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777

Even when Trump is somewhat accurate, he doesn't elaborate and misses opportunities.
He says he funded African American colleges at one point in one of his stream of consciousness rambling type answers.
What he should have said was , he gave then funding for 10 years as opposed to one year at a time under Obama.

Who knew? He tells so many lies that you just assume that none of it is true.

[FORD]