Socialism

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • standin
    Veteran
    • Apr 2009
    • 2274

    #31
    <object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xds013bUUK8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54 abd6&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xds013bUUK8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54 abd6&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
    To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
    MICHAEL G. MULLEN

    Comment

    • Big Train
      Full Member Status

      • Apr 2004
      • 4013

      #32
      Don't believe the hype when they say no redistribution of wealth

      The Associated Press: Thousands mob Detroit center in hopes of free cash

      Thousands mob Detroit center in hopes of free cash
      By COREY WILLIAMS (AP) – 38 minutes ago

      DETROIT — Police say authorities had to break up scuffles after thousands of Detroit residents tried to apply for free federal money.

      Long lines snaked into a downtown center Wednesday morning, but applications ran out quickly on the final day to get paperwork for a homelessness prevention program.

      Police say fights broke out as people pushed and shoved for spots in line. Several people have been treated for fainting and exhaustion.

      City officials say many falsely believed they were registering for $3,000 stimulus checks from the Obama administration.

      The federally funded program is for low-income residents who recently became homeless or are near homelessness. At least one in four Detroit households is in poverty.

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49646

        #33
        Originally posted by Big Train
        It's just about right, when you consider the size of our potential opponents (Russia, China, or a combo of both) while simultaneously needing the ability to defend the majority of North America (Mexicans and Canadians are both a little light on F-22's and Apaches).
        Dude, you're utterly clueless on this. Defend against what? The Chinese invasion of Wal-Mart? WTF do the Russians have? They get a hard on when they overrun small countries on their border they outnumber 100-to-1 in population...

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 59934

          #34
          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
          Dude, you're utterly clueless on this. Defend against what? The Chinese invasion of Wal-Mart?
          I think it's a little late for that.
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • Hardrock69
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Feb 2005
            • 21898

            #35
            Originally posted by Seshmeister
            We need some sort of new word for these posts.

            Can I suggest anti-posts?

            Posts that after you read them you actually know less.
            Sesh, you posted a classic definition of anything GAR posts around here.

            Comment

            • Big Train
              Full Member Status

              • Apr 2004
              • 4013

              #36
              Originally posted by Nickdfresh
              Dude, you're utterly clueless on this. Defend against what? The Chinese invasion of Wal-Mart? WTF do the Russians have? They get a hard on when they overrun small countries on their border they outnumber 100-to-1 in population...
              OK Patton has spoken...

              They are a POTENTIAL Threat, no matter what you may think about the ACTUAL chances of an attack. The weapons are in place as a strategic deterrent, as they should be.

              Comment

              • ELVIS
                Banned
                • Dec 2003
                • 44120

                #37
                We are largely a socialist population...

                Comment

                • Nickdfresh
                  SUPER MODERATOR

                  • Oct 2004
                  • 49646

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Big Train
                  OK Patton has spoken...
                  I prefer Gen. Lucian Truscott...

                  They are a POTENTIAL Threat, no matter what you may think about the ACTUAL chances of an attack. The weapons are in place as a strategic deterrent, as they should be.
                  They're relatively poor, spend a fraction of what we do on the military, and if it were just about defending North America, we'd spend a fraction of the annual budget on defense do now.

                  Comment

                  Working...