Repukes vote against Al Franken's anti-rape bill

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kwame k
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    • Feb 2008
    • 11302

    Repukes vote against Al Franken's anti-rape bill

    Washington, D.C. [Oct 6, 2009] – Today, the amendment offered by U.S. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) to stop funding defense contractors who deny assault victims their day in court passed the United States Senate by a vote of 68 - 30

    Last Thursday, Sen. Franken introduced an amendment (S.2588) to the FY2010 Defense Appropriations Bill that would restrict funding to defense contractors who commit employees to mandatory binding arbitration in the case of sexual assault. The legislation, endorsed by 61 women’s, labor and public interest groups, was inspired by the story of Jamie Leigh Jones, who watched the vote from the Senate gallery today.

    Jones was a 19-yr-old employee of defense contractor KBR (formerly a Halliburton subsidiary) stationed in Iraq who was gang raped by her co-workers and imprisoned in a shipping container when she tried to report the crime. Her father and U.S. Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tex.), worked together to secure her safe return to the United States, but once she was home, she learned a fine-print clause in her KBR contract banned her from taking her case to court, instead forcing her into an “arbitration” process that would be run by KBR itself. Just today, Halliburton filed a petition for a rehearing en banc in the 5th Circuit Court, which means that Jamie’s fight is far from over.

    “I’m proud of what we accomplished today,” said Sen. Franken. “Victims of sexual assault deserve their day in court and no corporation should be able to deny them that right. Jamie’s courage in telling her story will help women all over this country and I’m honored to have been a part of that.”

    “I am highly honored that Senator Franken and his wife have created this amendment to ensure that others do not have to endure the suffering that I have,” said Jones. “This amendment makes all the hard times that I have gone through, when going public with such a personal tragedy, worth every tear shed from telling and retelling my horrific experience. I know this amendment will save so many in the future.”

    Specifically, Sen. Franken’s amendment:

    Does not require contractors to change or modify existing employment contracts. It only bars funds to contractors who continue to use these mandatory arbitration clauses in their employment contracts.
    Narrowly targets the most egregious violations and applies to defense contracts, many of which are administered abroad, where women are the most vulnerable and least likely to have support resources. The amendment will apply to many contractors that have already demonstrated their incompetence in efficiently carrying out defense contracts, and have further demonstrated their unwillingness and their inability to protect women from sexual assault.
    Applies to claims arising out of sexual assault, like assault & battery (including rape), intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, as well as Title VII civil rights claims, which were specifically designed to protect vulnerable groups in the workplace.
    Leading Minnesota and national organizations who have endorsed Sen. Franken’s amendment include the Minnesota Women Lawyers, the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault, the Sexual Violence Center, Minnesota NOW, Advocates for Human Rights, the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the National Women’s Law Center, the National Partnership for Women and Families, the American Association of University Women, the National Council of La Raza, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and the Consumer Federation of America. A full list of the 61 endorsing organizations is attached.

    “Sexual violence is about a person trying to exercise power and control over another person through unwanted sexual contact and violence,” said Pam Zeller, Executive Director of the Sexual Violence Center. “In arbitration the intent is to arrive at an agreement. This agreement does not have to be equitable in order to be resolved. It is also not intended to resolve a criminal matter. Sexual harassment and sexual violence inherently have an imbalance of power. Submitting a victim of sexual harassment, or sexual assault, to a process of arbitration is a revictimization of the victim, and minimizes the seriousness of the crime of sexual assault. The proposed amendment by Senator Franken will protect victims of sexual harassment and sexual violence from being revictimized through the arbitration process.”

    “This amendment reflects a critically important step in safeguarding the rights of those who have experienced discrimination in the form of sexual violence, harassment, and stalking,” said Donna Dunn, Executive Director of the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault. “We know that justice for victims of violence often seems elusive. It is very important that each person have the right to assess and choose the options that they believe best fit their needs. This amendment is a giant step in that direction.”

    "No survivor of sexual assault should be denied the ability to seek justice,” said Terri Poore, Policy Chair of the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence. “Asking a victim to enter into arbitration with someone who raped her or a company that wouldn't protect her is outrageous and sends a clear message that such violence is simply not taken seriously."

    Link
    Originally posted by vandeleur
    E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D
  • kwame k
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    • Feb 2008
    • 11302

    #2
    30 Repukes voted against this amendment!!!!!!! So they have a problem that an employer can put a clause that you can not sue if you get raped working for them by other employees.

    So basically Repukes will vote against anything that the Dems propose, regardless of how logical or right it is.
    Originally posted by vandeleur
    E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

    Comment

    • bueno bob
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Jul 2004
      • 22951

      #3
      Shouldn't be surprising. Republicans have been raping America in one fashion or another for at least the last 70 years...not surprising to find that they're really pretty big fans of the concept.
      Twistin' by the pool.

      Comment

      • chefcraig
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Apr 2004
        • 12172

        #4
        Here's Jon Stewart's take, from The Moderate Voice website. Stewart makes an interesting and quite valid point: How can you be against funding ACORN because of corruption concerns, yet on the other hand wish to stay out of this because it isn't the concern of the government to involve itself with a business's internal corruption?

        Jon Stewart on the ‘Franken Anti-Government-Contractor Rape Liability Bill’ | The Moderate Voice
        Last edited by chefcraig; 10-16-2009, 10:59 AM.









        “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
        ― Stephen Hawking

        Comment

        • Va Beach VH Fan
          ROTH ARMY FOUNDER
          • Dec 2003
          • 17913

          #5
          <table style='font:11px arial; color:#333; background-color:#f5f5f5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='360' height='353'><tbody><tr style='background-color:#e5e5e5' valign='middle'><td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;'><a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com'>The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a></td><td style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align:right; font-weight:bold;'>Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td></tr><tr style='height:14px;' valign='middle'><td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'<a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-october-14-2009/rape-nuts'>Rape-Nuts<a></td></tr><tr style='height:14px; background-color:#353535' valign='middle'><td colspan='2' style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; width:360px; overflow:hidden; text-align:right'><a target='_blank' style='color:#96deff; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/'>www.thedailyshow.com</a></td></tr><tr valign='middle'><td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowFullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></embed></td></tr><tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'><td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100&#37;' height='100%'><tr valign='middle'><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes'>Daily Show<br/> Full Episodes</a></td><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com'>Political Humor</a></td><td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/09/23/ron-paul-on-the-daily-show-tuesday-sept-29/'>Ron Paul Interview</a></td></tr></table></td></tr></tbody></table>
          Eat Us And Smile - The Originals

          "I have a very belligerent enthusiasm or an enthusiastic belligerence. I’m an intellectual slut." - David Lee Roth

          "We are part of the, not just the culture, but the geography. Van Halen music goes along with like fries with the burger." - David Lee Roth

          Comment

          • Guitar Shark
            ROTH ARMY SUPREME
            • Jan 2004
            • 7579

            #6
            Classic
            ROTH ARMY MILITIA


            Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
            Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.

            Comment

            • Kristy
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Aug 2004
              • 16841

              #7
              Originally posted by kwame k

              Jones was a 19-yr-old employee of defense contractor KBR (formerly a Halliburton subsidiary) stationed in Iraq who was gang raped by her co-workers and imprisoned in a shipping container when she tried to report the crime. Her father and U.S. Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tex.), worked together to secure her safe return to the United States, but once she was home, she learned a fine-print clause in her KBR contract banned her from taking her case to court, instead forcing her into an “arbitration” process that would be run by KBR itself. Just today, Halliburton filed a petition for a rehearing en banc in the 5th Circuit Court, which means that Jamie’s fight is far from over.

              I have little respect for Franklin. This isn't so much about a bill to prosecute those big contractors who rape a coworker as much as it is him grinding his axe towards the Death Star Empire known as Haliburton. Franklin's heart may be in the right place but he doesn't know how to fight the battle(s) he picks. Seems that no one ever told him that when you go after a snake you cut off the head not simply grab it by the tail. Yeah, best of luck, Al.

              As for the the Rethuglicans the vote to block this Bill doesn't surprise me when one stops to consider just how many Rethugs take refuge in Haliburton's back pocket. Just another "don't rock the boat" in order to save face for your career at any cost. Sad, really when you read this because this convenient and superficial "justice" that the Rethuglican Party pontificates on about while at the same time seeing that Jones will never have a proper day in court.

              In the meantime, I'll be waiting for Yngwie's take on the matter.
              Last edited by Kristy; 10-16-2009, 12:44 PM.

              Comment

              • Guitar Shark
                ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                • Jan 2004
                • 7579

                #8
                Just for clarification, the Stewart clip is somewhat misleading. The employment contract doesn't prevent the rape victim from pursuing a claim at all - it just requires that the claim be brought in arbitration, rather than in court. Employers and employees sign arbitration agreements all the time, and they are usually enforceable.

                With that said, I would have serious reservations about enforcing an arbitration clause in the case of a rape.

                I'm not saying it's a defensible position, but the Stewart clip kind of glossed over this.
                ROTH ARMY MILITIA


                Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.

                Comment

                • Nitro Express
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 32942

                  #9
                  Actually it's the people who can cut the snake's head off. Politicians tend to be corrupt anyways and their sick personality faults is what makes them want to go into politics. The thing is when enough of the people just say "fuck you!" we aren't doing it, the people at the top lose their power base. It's quite effective. Like the company in France who tried to screw workers out of their severance pay and the workers threatened to burn the workplace down and the company gave in. Why there is endless raping is the American people have lost their balls. Plus, the bastards are so far in debt, they need the paycheck so they are too broke to go on strike. Pathetic. We make fun of the French but these are the people sticking up to the abuse and winning. Without workers and customers, these companies are nothing. As long as we bend over, they will ass rape us.
                  No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

                  Comment

                  • kwame k
                    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 11302

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Guitar Shark
                    Just for clarification, the Stewart clip is somewhat misleading. The employment contract doesn't prevent the rape victim from pursuing a claim at all - it just requires that the claim be brought in arbitration, rather than in court. Employers and employees sign arbitration agreements all the time, and they are usually enforceable.

                    With that said, I would have serious reservations about enforcing an arbitration clause in the case of a rape.

                    I'm not saying it's a defensible position, but the Stewart clip kind of glossed over this.
                    Wait a minute, was it a blanket arbitration clause for anything? I can't see arbitration being upheld for anything as serious as gang-rape or murder. I would think that no matter what you signed, the seriousness of the crime would supersede any contract.
                    Originally posted by vandeleur
                    E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                    Comment

                    • Guitar Shark
                      ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 7579

                      #11
                      Not sure, kwame. I haven't seen the contract.

                      But reading the article again, it says that KBR would have "run" the arbitration, which makes no sense to me. I've never heard of an arbitration conducted by the employer. I am hoping that's just poor journalism.

                      If anyone finds the contract, post it here! I think it would be interesting.
                      ROTH ARMY MILITIA


                      Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                      Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.

                      Comment

                      • kwame k
                        TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 11302

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Guitar Shark
                        Not sure, kwame. I haven't seen the contract.

                        But reading the article again, it says that KBR would have "run" the arbitration, which makes no sense to me. I've never heard of an arbitration conducted by the employer. I am hoping that's just poor journalism.

                        If anyone finds the contract, post it here! I think it would be interesting.
                        Same thing I was thinking, normally arbitration is done by a neutral third party.
                        Originally posted by vandeleur
                        E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                        Comment

                        • letsrock
                          Veteran
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 1595

                          #13
                          Originally posted by kwame k
                          Same thing I was thinking, normally arbitration is done by a neutral third party.
                          Typically done that way.

                          Comment

                          • Nickdfresh
                            SUPER MODERATOR

                            • Oct 2004
                            • 49643

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Guitar Shark
                            ...Employers and employees sign arbitration agreements all the time, and they are usually enforceable.

                            With that said, I would have serious reservations about enforcing an arbitration clause in the case of a rape.
                            ....

                            I have a problem with arbitration clauses in general. They should be completely voluntary and never be a condition of employment --or-- the results should be nonbinding to either side of the litigation as everyone knows that the arbitration is often controlled by firms with ties to the company in question.

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49643

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Guitar Shark
                              Not sure, kwame. I haven't seen the contract.

                              But reading the article again, it says that KBR would have "run" the arbitration, which makes no sense to me. I've never heard of an arbitration conducted by the employer. I am hoping that's just poor journalism.

                              If anyone finds the contract, post it here! I think it would be interesting.

                              I've heard of arbitrations run by parties with clear ties to the employer...

                              Comment

                              Working...