Biden Picks Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson As Supreme Leader

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nitro Express
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Aug 2004
    • 32942

    #31
    Anyways the government has always been crooked but right now it's a total joke. We have Mr. Magoo for president and the rest of it is pro-wrestling with the red team vs the blue team and plenty of dirt talking. So where's the infrastructure? Everyone is out for themselves in this game and the naive public actually think they matter.
    No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

    Comment

    • Nickdfresh
      SUPER MODERATOR

      • Oct 2004
      • 49640

      #32
      Originally posted by ZahZoo
      Yes... part of the First Amendment... it reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”.

      The Constitution doesn't say anything about preventing appointees to the SCOTUS from exercising their freedom of religion as US citizens. What's your point..? Did you have one?
      Actually, that's the fucking whole point, old man! Losing the plot, sleepy Zah? The justices do not get to "exercise there freedom of religion" as justices (i.e. overturning laws like decades of Roe v. Wade)..

      Otherwise you could justify things like slavery or the Holocaust, because it's in their religion...

      Comment

      • ZahZoo
        ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

        • Jan 2004
        • 9202

        #33
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Actually, that's the fucking whole point, old man! Losing the plot, sleepy Zah? The justices do not get to "exercise there freedom of religion" as justices (i.e. overturning laws like decades of Roe v. Wade)..

        Otherwise you could justify things like slavery or the Holocaust, because it's in their religion...
        Better to be sleepy than incoherent...

        Three branches dumbass... Legislative (Congress) makes the laws, Executive (President and cabinet) administers the laws, Judicial (SCOTUS and lower courts) interpret the laws based on the Constitution. It's known as the separation of powers... Only 3 parts so your simple mind should be able to comprehend it...
        "If you want to be a monk... you gotta cook a lot of rice...”

        Comment

        • Nickdfresh
          SUPER MODERATOR

          • Oct 2004
          • 49640

          #34
          Originally posted by ZahZoo
          Better to be sleepy than incoherent...

          Three branches dumbass... Legislative (Congress) makes the laws, Executive (President and cabinet) administers the laws, Judicial (SCOTUS and lower courts) interpret the laws based on the Constitution. It's known as the separation of powers... Only 3 parts so your simple mind should be able to comprehend it...
          Who the fuck are you talking to old man? Yourself? Memory exercises?

          Comment

          • Nitro Express
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Aug 2004
            • 32942

            #35
            Originally posted by Nickdfresh
            Actually, that's the fucking whole point, old man! Losing the plot, sleepy Zah? The justices do not get to "exercise there freedom of religion" as justices (i.e. overturning laws like decades of Roe v. Wade)..

            Otherwise you could justify things like slavery or the Holocaust, because it's in their religion...
            Yup. Supreme Court Justices are supposed to weigh every case against the US Constitution and nothing else. Justice is supposed to be blind. There really should be only two concerns about a nominee. Do they have the experience to be a decent Justice? Second, will they be unbiased in their rulings?

            The politicians and public want to load the court with people who will rule to favor one side or another. It's disgraceful. It makes the whole nomination process a big joke every time we go through it.
            No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

            Comment

            Working...