Seriously. I've never seen someone make the same argument FOR something and then makes the exact same argument AGAINST something...because it fits a narrative that even he doesn't seem to fully understand.
I've read a lot of stupid shit in political arguments. But the fact that we're now listening to someone make arguments about the "ideal" nature of dictatorships because it fits his narrative... I can't believe he types this shit and thinks he's making anything resembling a good point.
Anyone who has spent ANY time reading history books (or even just becoming educated) would not be stupid enough to talk about all the positive qualities of dictatorships. He doesn't even understand them.
If he's ever taken a university level course on economics or political science, I'd be very surprised. And if he has, he certainly didn't do the readings.
I've read a lot of stupid shit in political arguments. But the fact that we're now listening to someone make arguments about the "ideal" nature of dictatorships because it fits his narrative... I can't believe he types this shit and thinks he's making anything resembling a good point.
Anyone who has spent ANY time reading history books (or even just becoming educated) would not be stupid enough to talk about all the positive qualities of dictatorships. He doesn't even understand them.
If he's ever taken a university level course on economics or political science, I'd be very surprised. And if he has, he certainly didn't do the readings.
Comment